Hypothetical Study Proposal
Language literacy assessment is undergoing certain changes throughout the decades. The changes occur due to the shifts in the way literacy is defined and understood (Leu et al. 1). In addition to the skills that are seen as conventional (alphabetic recognition, reading skills, and comprehension skills), new competencies gain more attention (Nusche 839). These novel competencies include âways of thinkingâ (innovation, metacognition, and learning to learn), âways of workingâ (collaboration), âtools for workingâ (ICT literacy), and âliving in the worldâ (citizenship and social responsibility) (Nusche 839).
Students are taught to be fully integrated into society and employ all the instruments and opportunities the world has to offer. Therefore, it is critical to include these aspects in the assessment of childrenâs learning as this will enhance their further academic experience. The present study will concentrate on the benefits of integration of visual codes and collaborative work to reading and comprehension skills assessment. The primary focus will be on learnersâ ability to communicate and collaborate while performing tasks.
The questions guiding this study can be formulated as follows:
- Does the use of visual clues enhance studentsâ comprehension and collaboration?
- How effectively does collaboration enhance studentsâ comprehension skills and overall learning experience?
- How do collaborative activities affect studentsâ motivation?
Main body
The subjects of this study will be second graders, and their reading and comprehension skills will be assessed. The assessment will consist of two phases, individual and collaborative. During the individual phase, learners will receive a passage and a set of visuals depicting the events described in the text. The students will place the visuals in order and cross out an odd picture. As soon as a child is ready, they submit their papers and receive another task (not related to the assessment).
When all students have completed individual tasks, that are timed, the collaborative phase starts. The teacher divides students into groups depending on the pace at which they have worked and its correctness. Students complete a similar task they performed individually. Learners receive a text they should read, and they are also given several pictures they should put into the correct order. Students collaborate when placing pictures, and there are some odd cards they need to exclude.
The teacher may ask explicit and inferential questions to help students to cope with the task (Dubeck and Gove 320). Lookbacks (looking for some clues in the text) should be encouraged. The students then present their text and retell the story. They are instructed to tell the story together instead of delegating one member of the group to do it.
Conclusion
This assessment will reveal learnersâ reading and comprehension skills, as well as their ability to collaborate. In order to improve the performance of the students, an intervention similar to the one described above will be developed. Learners will receive passages and sets of visuals with two odd pictures. The increased number of misleading visuals will enhance studentsâ collaborative efforts. Another type of work that can be beneficial is the involvement of parents. Learners will be given similar tasks to complete at home with their parents, which will positively affect the development of the necessary skills and improve parental engagement.
Works Cited
Dubeck, Margaret M., and Amber Gove. âThe Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA): Its Theoretical Foundation, Purpose, and Limitations.â International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 40, 2015, pp. 315-322.
Leu, Donald J., et al. âNew Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessmentâ. Journal of Education, vol. 197, no. 2, 2017, pp. 1-18.
Nusche, Deborah. âStudent Assessment and Its Relationship with Curriculum, Teaching and Learning in the Twenty-First Century.â Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Dominic Wyse et al., SAGE, 2015, pp. 838-852.