Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Various fashion trends have always been a significant part of the things that make each era or century unique and easily recognizable. This essay will touch upon the fashion choices of the 20th century, particularly with regard to renowned designers who created a legacy. In this paper, an evening dress by Paul Poiret and an evening dress attributed to Gabrielle Chanel will be compared and contrasted.

Poiret’s dress (figure 1) was crafted in France, years 1922-1923. Born in 1879, Paul Poiret had been gradually achieving his fame since 1898 when a famous couturier took interest in his collections. However, for Poiret, it was the 1910s that became the decade in which fashion trends were shaped and dictated by him. (Koda, Bolton, 2008). In 1901, having finished his military service, Poiret was invited to work for the house of Worth. Although he had gained recognition due to his nightgowns, his purpose at Worth was creating a comfortable practical clothes for women to wear every day. (“Paul Poiret”, n. d.). This job helped Poiret understand the preferences of women for a daily outfit better and it might be exactly what prompted his future influence on the world of fashion.

Poiret’s first steps in the fashion industry were to make female bodies free from the restrictions of corsets and petticoats. Even though he was not the only designer trying to achieve this goal, he is the one now heavily associated with the new type of silhouette. Thus, his evening dress (figure 1) is an instance of such silhouette. It is a high-waisted uncorseted garment that consists of two separate pieces – a top and a long cylindrical skirt, but the impression it creates is that of a one-piece gown. Furthermore, this impression along with Poiret’s aspiration for the liberation of the body makes this evening dress resemble a modern variation of a peplos. Normally, a peplos is crafted out of a single piece of clothing. (Koda, 2003) However, the way it drapes around the body and forms a cylindrical shape is similar to Poiret’s gown in question (figure 1).

Both of the pieces of Poiret’s evening dress (figure 1) were tailored out of silk. The color palette of the dress consists of red and black that create a bold outstanding look appropriate for an evening occasion, such as going to a theater or visiting a party. Poiret’s designs were immensely popular among wealthy young women who searched for unique outfits and this nightgown would not be an exception, even though its fame declined in the 1920s.

Moving on to the second piece of clothing, it is an evening dress attributed to Gabrielle Chanel (figure 2). Just as the dress by Paul Poiret (figure 1), this one was created in the 1920s, specifically 1926-1927, supposedly by Gabrielle Chanel. Known under the nickname “Coco”, she was one of the most influential people in the fashion industry of the 20th century, having invented numerous trends. She was born in 1883 in Saumur in a poor family and could only open her first shops in Paris and Deauville with the help of a wealthy admirer. However, even then she had to resort to the usage of jerseys in her designs since the fabric was rather cheap. (Krick, 2004). Later, when Chanel was already prosperous in the fashion industry, she could afford more expensive materials.

Thus, the evening dress in question (figure 2) was tailored from silk with metallic lace and sequins. Now, it is widely known that Gabrielle Chanel made a revolution in the world of fashion due to the fact that she shifted the public’s attention from ultra-feminine outfits to simpler, more practical clothes. She often even took inspiration for her designs from menswear and adapted them into styles for independent women. (“Gabrielle Chanel”, n. d.). Nevertheless, decorative elements and lace were quite often used in her garments to make them more romantic and elegant. (Krick, 2004). Her gown (figure 2) is an instance of using additional ornamental elements for this purpose.

Apart from that, another prominent trait of Chanel’s gowns is their long slimline, resembling her own figure. It was a part of her concept of a “little black dress” – Chanel’s successful attempt to make women, mourning after the war, fashionable instead of devastated, and other evening dresses’ designs. (McDowell, 2015). This dress (figure 2) is a short, high-waisted, slim garment, simple and practical. The color palette is just as basic, including black and beige-brown, which are known to be Chanel’s favorite shades. In the 1920s young women striving to become more independent in their fashion choices could be wearing this gown to various evening occasions.

Comparing the two garments, similarities, as well as differences, can be singled out. Both of them are evening dresses from the same decade that were crafted using the same medium – silk. However, unlike Poiret’s gown (figure 1), Chanel’s dress (figure 2) includes additional decorative elements, namely sequins and metallic lace. At the same time, Poiret’s design (figure 1), although not heavy on decorative details, is a two-piece gown, as opposed to Chanel’s simple one-piece fashion (figure 2). Both designs are high-waisted and uncorseted, which was the new trend of the 20th century, but their overall appearances differ significantly. While Chanel’s one-piece gown (figure 2) is a long slim silhouette, Poiret’s garment (figure 1) resembles a Greek peplos due to the way it drapes around the body, giving the skirt a cylindrical shape. Finally, the color palette of Poiret’s dress (figure 1) is bolder and more vivid, mixing red with black, whereas Chanel’s gown (figure 2) is a simple combination of black and beige.

Figure 1
Figure 1
  • Designer: Paul Poiret
  • Title: Evening dress
  • Date: 1922-1923
  • Materials: Silk
  • Museum Accession Number: C.I.43.85.2a, b
Figure 2
Figure 2
  • Designer: Attributed to Gabrielle Chanel
  • Title: Evening dress
  • Date: 1926-1927
  • Materials: Silk, metallic thread, sequin
  • Museum Accession Number: C.I.65.47.2a, b

References

Gabrielle Chanel. (n. d.). The Museum at FIT. 2020,Web.

Koda, H. (2003). . The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Web.

Koda, H., & Bolton, A. (2008). . The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Web.

Krick, J. (2004). . The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Web.

McDowell, C. (2015). Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel (1883-1971). BoF – The Business of Fashion. Web.

Paul Poiret. (n. d.). The Museum at FIT. 2020, Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, February 24). Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-of-two-20th-century-garments/

Work Cited

"Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments." IvyPanda, 24 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-of-two-20th-century-garments/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments'. 24 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments." February 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-of-two-20th-century-garments/.

1. IvyPanda. "Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments." February 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-of-two-20th-century-garments/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Comparison of Two 20th Century Garments." February 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-of-two-20th-century-garments/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1