Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit Case Study

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Overview

Cooper Corporation is a meat processing investment in Michigan. The company offers its products to retailers and foodservice merchants. The organization generates profit based on its target market. The industry generates revenue through the retail and foodservice channels of product distribution. To maximize profits, the organization must determine the profitable channel of product distribution. Cooper’s financial sheets show an increase in marketing and logistics cost. The cost of marketing and the product delivery is $40,000,000. The breakdown shows the firm’s personal selling cost is $5,000,000 while sales promotion is $8,000,000.

The cost of packaging and order processing is $10,000,000 and $5,000,000 respectively. Based on the firm’s financial auditing, total sales revenue was $100,000,000. The accountant revealed that operating expenses rose to $55,000,000. The distribution of sales of each the channel of supply can be calculated using ratio percentage. However, the margin of return can be used to calculate the most profitable channel.

The case study shows that total sales = 100,000,000

However, the percentages of sales for both channels of distribution are 60% and 40% respectively.

Retail distribution channel = 60%

Foodservice distribution channel = 40%

Gross margin for retail market = 70%

Gross margin for foodservice = 45%

The cost of purchasing and distribution costs for both supply targets varied significantly.

Cost of purchase (retail) = 70%

Distribution costs (retail) = 80%

Cost of purchase (foodservice) =30%

Distribution costs (foodservice) = 20%

Profitability of Each Channel of Distribution

ExpendituresCostRetail costFoodservice cost
Sales Promotions$5,000,0005,000.0000
Personal Selling$8,000,0006,400,0001,600,000
Order Processing$10,000,0007,000,0003,000,000
Packaging$5,000,000
Labeling$2,000,000
Delivery$10,000,000

Retail Market Supply

Using the assumptions above, the percentage of sales (retail) = 70%

Total sales = 100,000,000

Therefore, gross margin = 60,000,000 x (70/100) = 42,000,000

Foodservice Market Supply

Using the assumptions above, the percentage of sales (foodservice) = 45%

Gross margin = 40,000,000 x 0.45 = $180,000,000.

Based on the net expenditures, the sales promotions were reported in retail supply logistics. Sales promotions = $8,000,000.

Personal selling expenses = $8,000,000.

The company employed 50 salespersons for product distribution.

Forty salespersons were employed to handle the retail supply logistics while ten salespersons were assigned to manage the foodservice distribution.

Thus, personal selling expenditures for each channel of distribution (retail) = 40/50 x 8,000,000 = 6,400,000.

Personal selling (foodservice) = 8,000,000 – 6,400,000 = 1,600,000.

For order processing expenditures, the retail distribution channel = 10,000,000 x 0.7 = 7,000,000.

For delivery expenses, the retail distribution channel = 10,000,000 x 0.8 = 8, 000, 000.

Thus, order processing costs for foodservice channel = 3,000,000.

Delivery expenses for foodservice distribution = 2,000,000.

The values are computed from the total expenses of each variable. The cost allocation is a fair assessment of each distribution channel. Therefore, the cost accountant must allocate an individual cost per channel. Based on the traditional cost allocation, the retail distribution channel generated more revenue and also incurred expenses.

Return on Assets for Each Channel of Distribution

The return on assets (ROA) measures cash inflow generated by a firm’s assets. The value describes how efficient managers can maximize profit using their assets.

The ROA = Net income / Average total assets = profit margin x total asset turnover. A higher ROA value means that assets are controlled efficiently to generate income. However, a low ROA will drive away investors because it indicates poor asset management. Total asset for each department can be computed against its net income.

Total asset (retail) machinery = 10,000,000

Account receivable = 3,000,000

Inventory = 4,000,000

Thus, total assets = 10,000,000 + 4,000,000 + 3,000,000 = 17, 000,000

Net income (retail) = 340,000

ROA (retail) = 340,000/17,000,000 x 100 = 2%.

Total asset (foodservice) = 6,000,000 + 1,000,000 = 7,000,000

Net income (foodservice) = 4,660,000

Return on assets (foodservice) = 4,660,000/7,000,000 x 100 = 67%.

The foodservice distribution channel has a higher ROA than the retail chain. As a result, the assets of the foodservice channel are efficiently controlled to maximize profit.

Recommendations

Based on the estimation above, the cost of production of each channel of distribution is lower than the net income. However, it is difficult to determine the most productive chain in output based on its expenditures. The low patronage by foodservice merchants may be influenced by different factors such as poor asset management, poor sales promotions, and weak delivery chain. The cost of sales promotions was incurred in the retail distribution channel. The information shows a different marketing strategy for the supply channels. Auditors of Cooper Corporation should adopt the activity-based costing method. The ABC method encourages effective asset management.

The ABC assists managers assign unmeasured variables in its operating costs and transactions (Huang 2018). Thus, managers can determine cost pools, allocation bases, cost objects, cost control, decision support, and the hierarchy of costs. The approach will support activities that enhance product supply, quality, and performance. Based on limited details on the case study, I will recommend the ABC technique to provide product costing in each channel of distribution, analyze the processes of delivery, evaluate sales performance, and calculate the profitability of each channel of distribution.

Reference List

Huang, Q 2018, ‘Traditional cost system vs. activity-based cost system: a managerial accounting case study’, Applied Finance and Accounting, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55-65.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, August 9). Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cooper-corporation-investment-revenue-and-profit/

Work Cited

"Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit." IvyPanda, 9 Aug. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/cooper-corporation-investment-revenue-and-profit/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit'. 9 August.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit." August 9, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cooper-corporation-investment-revenue-and-profit/.

1. IvyPanda. "Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit." August 9, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cooper-corporation-investment-revenue-and-profit/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Cooper Corporation: Investment, Revenue, and Profit." August 9, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/cooper-corporation-investment-revenue-and-profit/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1