Critique of Thomas Hobbes’ Views on Monarchy Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Thomas Hobbes advocated for the adoption of monarchy as the best form of government in his political philosophy writings particularly in his book, the Leviathan. Hobbes gives his arguments in support of the monarchy mainly through the adoption of the principle of the state of war (Hobbes 12).

According to him, man is naturally violent, and thus, there is a need for the establishment of an authoritative government in the form of a monarchy to check and contain the violent nature of man. This paper tries to give an analytical argument against Hobbes’ choice of a monarchy as the best form of government.

This will be done by firstly highlighting the main points used by Hobbes in his support for this type of governance, while at the same time identifying flaws and fallacies in these particular arguments fronting for the adoption of monarchy as a form of governance (Kraus 69).

Thomas Hobbes begins his defense for the adoption of monarchy as the best form of government by firstly exploring the concept of power. Here, Hobbes identifies two forms of power, namely: instrumental and natural power.

According to Hobbes, natural power emanates from the physical or mental ability of an individual, whereas instrumental power is acquired by fortune, which subsequently serves as a means to the acquisition of more power in the form of wealth. According to Hobbes, life is purely a continuous struggle to acquire power. All human beings are in Hobbes view, endowed with equal levels of natural power (Kraus 67).

Due to this equality, every individual makes an attempt to gain more instrumental powers to enable him or her compete with others within a state. People are ever striving to enhance their security and reputation, thus leading to chaos within the society. These ambitions if not well checked by an authoritative government easily lead to a state of war, hence men fights against their fellow men.

I therefore rise against Hobbes ideology of Monarchy form of governance as the most significant form of leadership, since in such state of nature that is depicted being flaunt of chaos, there is nothing beneficial can take place in this state of nature.

Furthermore, War and other form of chaotic conditions bring destruction of properties and deprivation of lives, which at the end of the makes lives of the masses from the community to remain miserable. The only remedy to the chaotic state of nature is the creation of a form of authority in which the implementation rules regulations checks the excessive application of men’s power.

This authority can only be created through the conferment of all people’s individual power to a single man or a group of men with the authority to make decisions for and on behalf of every member of the society or state (Baumgold 79).

The state of nature as presented by Hobbes may not be visible in the real world because the mere absence of a government is not a better reason to transform human beings to beasts as is the case in the state of war.

In addition, Hobbes uses the ability of the monarchy to compel its subjects as the best way to prevent the state of war. However, the ability to instill fear among the subjects cannot be the best way to prevent chaos within a state. This should rather be the establishment of systems where human nature is freely allowed to flourish.

In Hobbes’ view, peace, security and the welfare of the people can best be served when there is a close link between the private and the public interests (Hobbes 34). However, Hobbes use of monarchy does not show us how this can occur in monarchy governance.

The issue of individuals’ freedom is equally essential and it should form part of the basis for determining the success or failure of a particular form of government. Freedom implies that each and every individual is free to do whatever s/he thinks that is right. In this case, people considers different actions and deeds as wrong or right depending on there thinking.

Some individuals like thieves would kill/ murder and hold that action of killing as right, while the religious persons believe this wrong doing. For that matter, giving individuals freedom to make decision on particular matters is hard, and therefore, there is no a guarantee that a monarchy will succeed in meeting the needs of its subjects as it is held by Hobbes.

With the realty of changing conditions/ situations in the community, there is likely hood that monarchies at different times would end up misusing its authority to the disadvantage of the subjects (Baumgold 39).

Peace and security are virtually important in successful governance of any state, and without them, other individual rights such as freedom cannot be enjoyed. In addition, the atmosphere in the state of nature can actually force people to reconsider their resolves and quickly come into an agreement about a system of rules to govern them.

Sometimes it also becomes necessary for a government to exert its authority and fear to the people for sake of its successful existence (Kraus 79). The absence of laws and government is still a cause of chaos in any state; and this may be exemplified by the current situation in Somalia, which a government less state.

However, the above criticisms are still viable because in real sense, there has not been a chaotic society as the one described by Hobbes in the state of nature. Therefore, man is not a violent being even in the absence of laws and government.

In addition, most monarchies in the world have failed to uphold the welfare and interests of the people, and as such, this is not the best form of government integrating the private and public interests within a state. By government exerting force to its people, this only instills fear to the subjects besides deprivation of their freedom/ liberty and their rights.

Simply, with the Monarchy form of leadership mostly ending up in many failing ways and the aspects of leadership, there is no way people living in a such a state of nature can come to an agreement about the type of leadership to govern them so quickly, yet they had not known the rule of law before

Work Cited

Baumgold, Deborah. Hobbes’s Political Theory. New York: CUP Archive, 1988.print.

Hobbes, Thomas.Leviathan.New York: Mobile reference.2003.Print.

Kraus, Jody. The Limits of Hobbesian Contractarianism.London: Cambridge University Press, 1993.print.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, July 3). Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy. https://ivypanda.com/essays/critique-of-thomas-hobbes-views-on-monarchy/

Work Cited

"Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy." IvyPanda, 3 July 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/critique-of-thomas-hobbes-views-on-monarchy/.

References

IvyPanda. (2019) 'Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy'. 3 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2019. "Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy." July 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/critique-of-thomas-hobbes-views-on-monarchy/.

1. IvyPanda. "Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy." July 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/critique-of-thomas-hobbes-views-on-monarchy/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Critique of Thomas Hobbes' Views on Monarchy." July 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/critique-of-thomas-hobbes-views-on-monarchy/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1