Summary
The migration of Cubans to the United States is complicated because it is influenced by various circumstances, making a solution challenging to discover. There has been a considerable influx of Cubans into the United States due to the convergence of political, economic, and cultural push factors in Cuba and pull factors in the United States. This research aims to look into the reasons contributing to the exodus of Cubans to the United States and give recommendations for how to reverse this migratory pattern. For various reasons, including political, economic, and cultural push factors in Cuba and pull factors in the United States, the Cuban population is migrating to the United States. This challenge can be remedied by combining policy changes made at the national level with local efforts.
Country Location and Physical Geography
Mountainous terrain, lowlands, and coastal plains may be found in the island nation of Cuba, which can be found in the Caribbean approximately 120 kilometers (75 miles) to the south of the U.S. state of Florida. The migration patterns of the Cuban population can be partially attributed to the island’s topography (Donato and Amuedo-Dorantes 1). For instance, Cuba’s geographical proximity to the United States has made it simpler for Cubans to go to that country. On the other hand, the hilly interior of Cuba has made it challenging for the Cuban government to exert its authority over the entire nation. As a result, specific regions, particularly those in the mountains, can now function as safe havens for political dissidents and other individuals attempting to flee the country (Donato and Amuedo-Dorantes 1). In addition, the coastal parts of Cuba have long been attractive tourist destinations, which has contributed to the growth of a tourism industry that, in turn, has attracted workers from other countries, particularly the United States. These elements, in addition to several others, have played a role in the Cuban population’s varied and complicated movement patterns.
Historical Background
The historical backdrop of Cuban migration to the United States is defined by political, economic, and cultural variables that have influenced the movement of people from Cuba to the United States over several decades. These causes have contributed to the migration of Cubans to the United States. The Cuban Revolution of 1959 was one of the most significant events that cleared the door for large-scale immigration from Cuba to the United States (Donato and Amuedo-Dorantes 1). The revolution, led by Fidel Castro, eventually ended in establishing a communist government, resulting in the nationalization of many privately owned businesses and enormous economic suffering (Donato and Amuedo-Dorantes 1). Many Cubans fled the island for a better life, fleeing the country’s political and economic repression.
The relationship between the United States and Cuba has been defined by tension and conflict, which has led to the movement of Cubans to the United States. The Bay of Pigs invasion, which occurred in 1961, is one example of the political friction between the two countries (Gosin 2). Cuba’s Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 was a failed military operation (Gosin 2). The US government planned and funded the invasion, but a group of anti-Castro Cuban exiles carried it out. The invasion’s anticipated outcome was the overthrow and replacement of Cuba’s government led by Fidel Castro with a new administration more friendly to the United States of America. The invasion of Cuba in the Bay of Pigs is a watershed moment in Cuban and American history, with far-reaching consequences. The invasion was a tremendous cause of embarrassment for the United States of America and a significant source of propaganda victory for the Cuban government (Levitt 16). The failed invasion contributed to the rise of tensions between the US and Cuba and the degradation of their relationship.
Following the failed invasion, the Soviet Union began supplying Cuba with military and economic assistance, seeing this as an opportunity to expand its influence in Cuba and the Caribbean region. This triggered the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, which briefly took the world to the brink of nuclear war (Henderson 2). In terms of migration, the Bay of Pigs invasion is viewed as a catalyst for many Cubans seeking to flee their country’s political and economic upheaval. These people were looking for a better life for themselves and their families elsewhere. Following the invasion, the Castro regime tightened its grip on political opponents, and a substantial number of Cuban exiles fled to the United States. This included Cuban exiles who had taken part in the invasion.
The invasion’s failure contributed to the common impression among many Latin Americans that the United States is an untrustworthy partner, further complicating the region’s political environment. The US has also imposed an economic blockade on Cuba, which has exacerbated the island’s economic predicament and driven many Cubans to flee the nation in pursuit of better opportunities overseas. Another significant event in the history of Cuban migration is the 1980 Mariel boatlift, which happened in 1980 and resulted in the immigration of around 125,000 Cubans to the United States (Levitt 25). The boatlift occurred in response to the Cuban government’s proclamation that it would allow anyone who wanted to escape the island. Thousands of Cubans took advantage of the opportunity to flee the island, resulting in the boat lift. Many Cuban nationals have traveled to the United States for many years for economic opportunities and political freedoms (Levitt 27). Furthermore, Cuban Americans have established strong transnational communities, allowing them to maintain close contact with their relatives and friends in Cuba while still building new lives in the United States.
Migration Push Factors: Political Issues
The United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was responsible for the abortive Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961. The invasion was an attempt to carry out a military invasion of Cuba. The destruction of Fidel Castro’s communist government and the installation of an administration more favorable to the United States was the stated goal of the invasion (Levitt 32). However, due to poor preparation and execution, the invasion failed, and the Cuban military could quickly beat those who attempted to invade. This episode constituted a critical turning point in US-Cuba relations, with the Cuban government growing more mistrustful of the United States and aligning itself more closely with the Soviet Union due to this turning point (Simoni and Voirol 2600). A significant number of Cuban residents left their country as a direct result of the Bay of Pigs invasion, which profoundly affected the political situation in Cuba. Following the invasion’s failure, the Cuban government strengthened its political repression, and many people who were seen as opposed to the dictatorship were detained and imprisoned.
The Cuban government initiated a large-scale effort to nationalize land and property, which contributed to the exodus of many Cuban nationals when the government appropriated their homes and places of business. In addition, the invasion at the Bay of Pigs and the political repression that followed it on the part of the Cuban government led to the establishment of a significant Cuban exile community in the United States. This community, composed of former political opponents of the dictatorship and business people who had lost their property, was highly critical of the Cuban government and lobbied for a change in the United States’ attitude toward Cuba (Simoni and Voirol 2765). This political pressure from the Cuban exile community played a significant role in the decision of the United States to impose a trade embargo on Cuba, which further contributed to the economic hardships that many Cubans faced and their migration to the United States.
The political unrest in Cuba, as well as the possibility of being subjected to physical harm and political persecution at the hands of the communist government, were additional factors that contributed to the exodus of Cubans to the United States. In a nation that did not permit political dissent, many Cubans were concerned for their safety and ability to support their families. This was especially true of the younger generation. As a result, many Cubans left the country searching for refuge in the United States, where they could lead liberated lives and pursue various career paths.
Migration Push Factors: Economic Issues
Several different economic considerations also played a role in the emigration of Cubans to the United States. The fall of the Cuban economy in the middle of the 20th century, marked by a decrease in sugar prices and a general slowdown in economic activity, was one of the most significant economic reasons. A broad economic slowdown characterized this decline. Many Cubans have seen a drop in their living level as a direct result of the fall of the sugar industry, making it increasingly challenging for them to make ends meet. Additionally, the implementation of collectivization policies by the communist regime led to a fall in private enterprise, further exacerbating the economic difficulties that many Cubans are currently experiencing. In the late 1950s, as part of the socialist revolution led by Fidel Castro and the Communist Party of Cuba, the Cuban government began implementing policies of collectivization. In an effort to advance social justice and boost agricultural output, these policies sought to nationalize extensive landholdings and establish cooperatives, which are collective farms with shared ownership and management.
On the other hand, the collectivization policies had several unfavorable effects on the Cuban economy. The forcible nationalization of land led to the loss of property for many farmers, which resulted in widespread dissatisfaction and hostility toward the policies being implemented at the time. A reduction in agricultural output and efficiency was another consequence of the absence of incentives and private ownership in the cooperatives. As a result of the fact that they would not directly profit from an increase in production, many farmers needed more drive to put in significant effort and make improvements to their cooperatives. In addition, the introduction of collectivization programs disrupted trade agreements with the United States, Cuba’s most important trading partner. In retaliation for the nationalization of businesses and land owned by Americans, the United States imposed a trade embargo on Cuba. This resulted in enormous repercussions for the Cuban economy, as the nation could no longer access important markets and a range of needed items.
In addition, the policies of collectivization led to significant food shortages, which necessitated the implementation of rationing as the nation battled to satisfy the requirements of its growing population. This made Cuba’s already difficult economic situation even worse and contributed to the country’s inhabitants leaving for the United States in pursuit of better economic possibilities (Osborne 10). The economic embargo that the United States has placed on Cuba is a collection of restrictions imposed by the United States on Cuba. These restrictions prohibited most commercial and financial activities between the two countries. The embargo was initially established in 1960, shortly after the communist regime of Fidel Castro assumed control in Cuba and confiscated property owned by the United States (Osborne 17). The United States of America responded with an embargo because it considered nationalization a threat to its interests in the region and a challenge to the principles of capitalism and democracy (Osborne 26). The embargo profoundly affected the Cuban economy, stifling the nation’s capacity to import products and restricting its access to foreign investment and finance.
The upshot of this was a decrease in the living level for the Cuban people and a shortage of essential items. The embargo caused the agricultural sector, which had previously been one of the most prolific in the Caribbean, to suffer tremendously. As a result, Cuba was forced to import food to satisfy its requirements. Because of the embargo, Cuba could not acquire contemporary technologies and was shut off from international financial markets, which had a knock-on effect on the country’s economy. Because of this, the nation was unable to foster the growth of new industries, generate new employment opportunities, and enhance its people’s standard of living.
Migration Push Factors: Cultural Issues
A key contributor to the migration of Cubans to the United States was the oppressive nature of the government of Fidel Castro’s Cuba, which severely curtailed citizens’ rights to freedom of expression and religion. The Cuban government instituted stringent censorship of the country’s media and religious institutions to keep its grip on the country and its people (Marquardt et al. 45). Consequently, people’s capacity to freely practice their religious views could have been improved, and there was a reduction in the degree to which they had freedom of speech. The government’s control over the media was exceptionally severe, and the government stifled any criticism or challenge to the administration. Consequently, residents were deprived of their constitutional right to express their thoughts freely and were forced to contend with an unbalanced narrative. This restriction on freedom of expression was considered a blatant infringement of the fundamental human right to express one’s opinions and ideas.
The government of Cuba exercised a great deal of authority over religious organizations and institutions. As a result of the government’s perception that religion posed a potential danger to its authority, the government actively worked to restrict religion’s sphere of influence. Churches and other religious organizations were subject to stringent regulations, which included monitoring religious leaders and followers, who were frequently persecuted for their beliefs. Many Cubans felt disillusioned and dissatisfied due to the government’s restrictions on their freedom of expression and religion since they believed that fundamental rights were being denied to them (Marquardt et al. 123). Migration to the United States became an option for people who disagreed with the government’s policies and were looking for the freedom to practice their religious beliefs. They could uninhibitedly practice their religion and voice their ideas in the United States without the threat of being persecuted by the government.
A significant contributor to the emigration of Cubans to the United States was the government of Cuba’s suppression of the country’s cultural customs and practices. Following the uprising in 1959, the government began enacting measures to establish a socialist and uniform society (Marquardt et al. 124). This included the removal of cultural practices and ideas deemed to be counter-revolutionary or not by the socialist philosophy that was prevalent at the time (Marquardt et al. 127). The government banned traditional music and dance, shut down religious institutions, and supported the development of new forms of art and culture that were more reflective of its socialist ideology. As a result, many Cubans no longer engage in the cultural rituals and beliefs passed down through generations, and they report feeling estranged from their ancestry.
The suppression of their cultural identity was a major driving force behind their desire to move, particularly for those individuals who were deeply committed to maintaining their cultural history and traditions. They could participate in cultural occasions and activities that permitted them to reacquaint themselves with aspects of their Cuban background when they moved to the United States. They may join communities with other Cuban immigrants. In addition, the lack of freedom of speech in Cuba was another factor that led some Cuban immigrants to leave the country in search of communities outside of Cuba where they could express their cultural identity and views openly (Marquardt et al. 132). Their capacity to impart their traditional practices and convictions was restricted due to the robust control exercised over the media and religious organizations. As a result, they looked for communities where they could openly express their ethnic heritage.
The Cuban Revolution of 1959, which Fidel Castro headed, was responsible for bringing about profound shifts in the nation’s political, economic, and social structures. The breakdown of traditional family units was an unforeseen side effect of the revolution, which had widespread repercussions (Marquardt et al. 134). Many Cubans left the island to escape the political repression and economic suffering that the country was experiencing due to the government’s implementation of new policies and significant changes. Because of this, many families were split up, some members moving to different nations while others remained in their native land. The relocation process was complicated for many Cuban families because they had to leave their homes, possessions, and communities behind.
The psychological and emotional hardship experienced by being separated from loved ones led many Cuban immigrants to seek support from other Cuban immigrants once they had settled in their new countries of residence. Some families could get back together with the assistance of other family members or acquaintances who were already living overseas, but the separation was irreversible for other families. The breakup of traditional family units had a significant and lasting effect on the Cuban population worldwide, not only in Cuba but also in other nations. People who moved to the United States frequently had difficulty adapting to their new environments and developing a feeling of the community after arriving. The shift was made much more challenging by the loss of cultural customs and the emotional hardship of being removed from loved ones.
Another important element that contributed to the migration of Cubans to the United States was the scarcity of educational and employment possibilities in Cuba. Under Fidel Castro’s leadership, the Cuban government instituted policies restricting certain people’s access to education and employment opportunities (Henderson 15). These groups included those who were opposed to the government or were members of particular racial, ethnic, or religious communities. This limiting of chances was part of a more significant attempt by the government to control and regulate all sectors of Cuban life, including the economy and the labor market (Henderson 20). Because of these regulations, many people with high levels of education and professional experience, such as educators, professionals, and company owners, discovered that they could not advance in their careers or provide for their families.
The absence of opportunities and the nation’s precarious political and economic state drove many Cubans to search for a better life elsewhere. In addition, as a consequence of the government’s actions, many industries have seen a scarcity of qualified experts and skilled workers, which has contributed to both economic difficulties and a reduction in productivity. This, in turn, made the dearth of employment options and economic prospects for many Cuban individuals even more severe. Those who successfully found work typically received low earnings, and their employment was precarious at best. Individuals had difficulty beginning their firms or pursuing self-employment because the Cuban government put stringent regulations on private enterprise and entrepreneurship, making it impossible for people to work for themselves.
Geography and Status of Migrants in the US
There is a large amount of variation in both the geography of migrants in the United States and their legal status. This variation is caused by several factors, including the motivations for migration, the period in which they came, and their situations. For instance, Cuban refugees who arrived in the United States in the latter half of the 20th century typically made their homes in South Florida, particularly in Miami (Ochoa-Winemiller 23). A significant number of these refugees were Cubans who, in order to escape the political and economic unrest in their home country, made the dangerous journey to the United States.
Consequently, Little Havana in Miami has developed into a central location for the Cuban-American community. It now has its cultural institutions as well as businesses (Wijburg et al. 1379). On the other hand, Mexican migrants have the propensity to settle in states that are located along the border between the United States and Mexico, such as California, Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico, in addition to other states that have large Latino populations, such as Illinois, New York, and Florida. For various reasons, Mexican migrants tend to settle in particular states inside the United States (Ochoa-Winemiller 15). Their proximity to the border makes it possible for them to keep in touch with their relatives and the areas where they live in Mexico (Ochoa-Winemiller 15). Second, they frequently go to locations with well-established Mexican communities to get assistance and other resources there. This is especially true in the states along the border between the United States and Mexico, where Mexican immigrants have established close-knit communities with time.
In addition to a state’s proximity to the border, one of the most important factors that draw Mexican migrants is the number of work possibilities offered there. In states such as California, Arizona, and Texas, with a large Mexican immigrant population, many migrants find employment in labor-intensive industries such as agriculture, construction, and hospitality. They frequently find themselves lured to these states due to the abundance of labor opportunities and the comparatively inexpensive cost of living compared to other regions of the country. Finally, some Mexican immigrants live in states with substantial Latino populations because of the sense of community and cultural familiarity that these states offer (Ochoa-Winemiller 22). This is a factor that influences their decision to migrate from Mexico. This is especially true for senior migrants, who may have difficulty adjusting to a new nation and learning the language of that country.
Their transition to life in the United States can be made easier if they can locate a community where they can obtain support and resources from individuals who share their culture and experiences. In addition, the legal status of migrants in the United States is quite variable. While some migrants can gain legal status and citizenship, others remain undocumented and suffer various problems, such as the fear of being deported and restricted access to certain services and benefits (Ochoa-Winemiller 19). Some migrants can obtain legal status and citizenship. In addition, while some immigrants can achieve economic stability and upward mobility, others suffer from poverty and work in occupations that pay low wages. The experiences of migrants can also differ depending on racial and cultural background, gender, degree of education, and the skills they bring.
Return-migration and Transnationalism
In the context of migration, it is essential to have a solid understanding of two interconnected ideas: return migration and transnationalism. People who move to another nation and then decide to move back to the country from which they originally emigrated are a phenomenon known as return migration (Bucheli and Fontenla 12). On the other hand, transnationalism refers to establishing and sustaining social, economic, and political ties between people who have relocated to a different country and the nation from which they originally came (Bucheli and Fontenla 22). When it comes to migration that goes in the opposite direction, people can have several different motivations for moving back to the country from which they originally came. For instance, some individuals may decide to go back home because they yearn for the company of their relatives and friends as well as their native culture.
Others may return because they need help to succeed in their new country, whether due to discrimination, a dearth of employment possibilities, or problems adjusting to a different culture. In addition, some people may travel back to their home country because they have completed the tasks, they set out to do in the new nation, such as getting an education or starting a career, and feel that they are now ready to move on to the next phase of their lives there (Bucheli and Fontenla 27). Transnationalism is another aspect that plays a significant role in the lives of migrants since it enables them to keep links to their home country even after they have relocated to a new one. For instance, many Mexicans who have immigrated to the United States may continue to participate in cultural activities, continue to contribute financially to their relatives in Mexico, and continue to be active in the political life of their native country. People can keep their cultural identity and sense of belonging even after leaving where they were born because of the transnational connections between people.
In the context of migration, it is essential to understand return migration and transnationalism since these concepts show the intricate and ever-changing character of the movement. Although many people decide to move to a different nation to take advantage of new opportunities, they frequently keep strong links to their homeland and frequently entertain the idea of returning. These linkages and experiences of return migration and transnationalism have substantial repercussions for individuals, families, and communities in both the country of origin and destination. These repercussions are felt in both countries. The economy and the society of the nation of origin are susceptible to both positive and negative effects brought on by return migration. The return of migrants can, on the one hand, bring significant talents, experiences, and resources that can assist in boosting economic growth and development; on the other hand, migrants may not return. On the other hand, the return of large numbers of migrants can also burden social services and increase competition for jobs. This might be a consequence of migration.
Transnationalism has a variety of repercussions, not just for the country of origin but also for the country where people choose to settle. Transnationalism can benefit the nation of origin by preserving cultural links and providing financial support to emigrating citizens (Bucheli and Fontenla 42). Transnationalism, on the other hand, can result in society’s fragmentation and social tensions between those who have migrated and those who have not migrated. Transnationalism has the potential to bring about cultural diversity and contribute to economic progress in the country in which people dwell (Bucheli and Fontenla 40). On the other hand, it may also result in the formation of ethnic enclaves and the exclusion of particular migrant groups. In addition, transnationalism can present difficulties for policymakers as they attempt to simultaneously satisfy the requirements of both the country of origin and the country of settlement.
Proposed Solutions
Over many years, many different ideas for resolving the problem of migration have been put forward, and these ideas have sparked a great deal of controversy and debate. The following are some of the most frequently put forward suggestions: Increasing the resources and workforce allocated to securing the borders is one solution that may be implemented to improve border security. Some examples of this approach include the construction of a wall or an increase in the number of border patrol agents. The purpose of this proposed solution is to make it more challenging for individuals to cross the border unauthorizedly. Reform of the immigration system entails updating and modernizing the system, making it more straightforward for people to join the nation legally and remain there without fear of deportation (Wijburg et al. 1365). Comprehensive immigration reform. This may involve modernizing the visa system, simplifying the application procedure, and providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. This strategy entails providing financial and technical aid to countries that are the source of a large number of migrants in order to help such countries address the core causes of migration, such as poverty, a lack of education and work opportunities, and violence.
Taking action to stop human rights violations which entails working with national governments and international organizations to stop human rights violations, such as political repression and acts of violence, which force people to escape their home countries, is one approach to the problem. Another proposed solution is increasing international collaboration that entails engaging with other nations to develop a method that is more coordinated and unified in its approach to tackling migration, such as through regional accords and enhanced international collaboration.
A more secure border can help prevent illegal immigration. However, it can also have unintended consequences, such as making the environment less welcoming for migrants and making it more dangerous to cross the border. In addition, border security measures can be pretty pricey, and there is no guarantee that they will discourage migrants intent on crossing. Comprehensive immigration reform has the potential benefit of producing a more orderly and equitable immigration system. However, it also has the potential to be politically contentious and may take a significant amount of time to put into effect. Concerns may arise regarding the cost of such reforms and their potential effects on the economy and society.
Providing economic assistance to countries of origin can address the root causes of migration and reduce the need for people to leave their homes. However, it may also take a long time to see results and may not address other factors. It is possible that addressing violations of human rights will help lessen the number of reasons that individuals leave their home countries. However, doing so may be challenging and call for considerable resources and political will. Increasing international cooperation has the potential benefit of producing a more coordinated and effective strategy for dealing with migration. However, it may also be challenging to reach a consensus among nations with different viewpoints and priorities due to the diversity of their approaches.
Works Cited
Bucheli, José R., and Matías Fontenla. “The Impact of Return Migration on Economic Development.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2022, pp. 1–45., Web.
Donato, Katherine M, and Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes. “The Legal Landscape of U.S. Immigration: An Introduction.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, 2020, p. 1., Web.
Gosin, Monika. “The Mariel Boatlift, Haitian Migration, and the Revelations of the ‘Black Refugees.’” Anthurium A Caribbean Studies Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, 2021, Web.
Henderson, Timothy J. Beyond Borders: A History of Mexican Migration to the United States. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Levitt, Peggy. The Transnational Villagers. Univ. of California Press, 2001.
Marquardt, Marie F., et al. Living “Illegal”: The Human Face of Unauthorized Immigration. New Press, 2011.
Ochoa-Winemiller, Virginia. Racialism, Drugs, and Migration: Contemporary Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cognella, 2020.
Osborne, Linda Barrett. This Land Is Our Land: A History of American Immigration. Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2016.
Simoni, Valerio, and Jérémie Voirol. “Remittances and Morality: Family Obligations, Development, and the Ethical Demands of Migration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 47, no. 11, 2020, pp. 2516–2536., Web.
Wijburg, Gertjan, et al. “Cuban Migrants and the Making of Havana’s Property Market.” Urban Geography, vol. 42, no. 9, 2020, pp. 1362–1387., Web.