Introduction
Cubism is one of the most significant movements in developing 20th-century art. Its profound impact even touched upon the direction of art in the years that followed. Cubism became a challenge for artists who wanted to change traditional forms of representation and encouraged painters and the audience to investigate alternative perspectives and representations of the world (Adamson 14). With the aid of Cubism, the numerous boundaries affecting artistic disciplines were broken down, with inspiration contributing to the deployment of new forms and styles in painting, sculpture, architecture, and design.
Georges Braque’s “Still Life with a Guitar” is an essential Cubist work that accentuates the importance of creativity and innovation in several ways. First, it is vital to mention that the painting is a masterful example of cubist fragmentation and reassembly. Braque utilized a series of geometric forms that pictured the guitar and then generated a sense of movement and depth when reassembled (Chao 24). This approach to composition was highly innovative and reflected a new way of seeing and depicting the world.
Another essential idea concerning the Cubist roots of “Still Life with a Guitar” is the tangible exemplification of collaboration and experimentation. Braque cooperated closely with Pablo Picasso. The two artists shared ideas and techniques in collaboration (O’Brien 31). Accordingly, new forms and styles were developed and fostered to establish a sense of innovation and creativity pertaining to Cubist art. The importance of the movement can be seen reflected in the way it influenced succeeding movements, such as Futurism, Constructivism, and Surrealism (Wilhelm 524).
Traditional art representations were challenged by Cubism because respective artists found new ways of seeing and explaining the world. Multiple connections between other artistic disciplines were established in an attempt to inspire the audience and develop a new view of the world. The current paper discusses and analyzes how techne theory sides with the core concepts pertaining to Cubism and what is the role of Georges Braque’s “Still Life with a Guitar” in popularizing creativity and going beyond the notion of mere genius via innovation.
Historical Background of Cubism
Definition of Cubism
Cubism is a revolutionary art movement that originated in the early 20th century between 1907 and 1914. The two movement pioneers who contributed to Cubism the most were Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque (Charles and Podoksik 47). The cubist movement was characterized by form fragmentation and the smart use of geometric shapes in an attempt to refute classical art views on perspective. Cubism supporters were focused on the possibility of depicting a fractured world where the complex setting of modern life would be depicted. Cubism was marked by a focus on analyzing form and exploring new ways to represent space and volume. Hence, two specific forms of Cubism appeared as a result: analytical Cubism and synthetic Cubism.
Analytical Cubism, which emerged around 1907, was characterized by deconstructing objects into geometric shapes, mainly cubes. It was essential for artists to break down entities and then reassemble them in an abstract form (Defeyt et al. 27). Even though the majority of these works were difficult to interpret due to monochromatic looks, artists mostly cared about the structure and form of their art and considered representational qualities inferior to the inherent meaning of their art objects.
Synthetic Cubism, which emerged around 1912, was a response to the limitations of analytical Cubism. In order to advance and step away from weaker points of synthetic Cubism, artists began creating significantly fewer abstract pictures via collages and mixed media structures, which also featured vivid colors (Defeyt et al. 30). Hence, synthetic Cubism was focused on art representations where the audience had to be moved by the looks and not the inherent meaning premeditated by artists.
The Historical Context of Cubism
Cubism was a revolutionary art movement that also influenced modern art in a number of ways. It was a response to the shifting times and cultural disturbances that portrayed the period leading up to World War I (Wenderski 309). Numerous challenges pertaining to the Industrial Revolution also affected Cubism because artists were willing to find new ways of representing their ideas. The modern age required artists to step away from their conventional approaches to art, especially knowing that traditional ways of thinking were prevalent.
The main element of the historical context that has to be associated with Cubism is the rise of photography and filmmaking. Braque and Picasso developed a completely new art genre to withstand the impact of traditional representations of art and curb the domination of classical European art. The inspiration for cubist works mostly came from Oceanic and African art, where the focus was on natural forms and objects (Munch 290). Accordingly, it was a huge step forward due to the opportunity to overcome the intangible limitations of classical art.
Characteristics of Cubism
One of the most essential features of Cubism is form fragmentation. Artists were willing to break down objects into constituents to ensure that they could create a collage-like effect. The latter was expected to challenge traditional notions of representation (Zhao 63). The inclusion of fragmentation in the bigger picture was mostly informed by the availability of various geometric shapes, such as triangles, circles, and rectangles, which were used by cubist artists to represent different elements of the subject.
One more variable to consider when talking about Cubism is the use of multiple viewpoints. Artists such as Braque and Picasso represented objects and subjects from different perspectives to provide the audience with thought-provoking scenery and enhance the comprehensive nature of their art (Adamson 11). Even the viewer’s perception of reality could be affected by cubist representations because of the masterful use of colors and geometrical figures. To achieve the inherent objective, cubist painters often resorted to limited palettes to avoid any bold colors. This helped them emphasize the abstract nature of the subject rather than distracting the audience from it with overly bright colors.
Definition of Techne Theory
Techne theory is a philosophical concept that refers to the relationship between technology, art, and culture. The fundamental proposition of the theory is that technology has a significant impact on our perception of the world (Staten 3). Thus, a person’s creations and cultural interactions can be seen as informed by technology. The primary concept of techne is rooted in ancient Greek philosophy because practical skills and knowledge were required to produce something valuable back in the day. This idea ultimately links techne to craftsmanship and the need to find ways to apply knowledge and skill to create something that has a specific purpose or function.
Human creativity can be expected to make the best use of technology to come up with extensive solutions that are ingenious and valuable. Yet, in order to be in line with the techne theory, such inventions should represent the sociocultural background of one’s existence and not a mere means to an end (Staten 5). Therefore, techne theory looks into how people collaborate and create artifacts where technology shapes one’s perception of reality.
It can be safe to say that the relationship between technology and art is also an essential aspect of techne theory. The need to attain aesthetic value closes the gap between art and technology because specific skills have to be on display to find new and creative solutions (Susik 17). Hence, techne theory informs people’s understanding of art and how the latter can be appreciated. This became especially true after the advent of the camera and printing press when many artists started experimenting with their representations of reality.
Nevertheless, it is vital to understand how the techne theory also emphasizes the role of culture in shaping people’s understanding of technology and its impact on society. As a dynamic variable, culture is driven by various practices, values, and systems of beliefs that tend to evolve in real time (Staten 7). Technology and culture are intertwined, creating a rich and complex relationship between philosophical concepts. The latter emphasizes the importance of creativity, skill, and practical knowledge in the production of both technology and art.
Analysis of Georges Braque’s Manifesto
Brief Biography
Georges Braque, a French painter and sculptor, was instrumental in the rise of Cubism, one of the imperative art movements of the 20th century. Braque began his artistic career as a house painter before enrolling at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris. He was born in Argenteuil, France, in 1882. He was profoundly inspired by Paul Cézanne and the Fauvist movement, which emphasized expressive brushwork and bright colors (Tamang 31).
As a result of his exploration of many painting techniques, Braque collaborated with Pablo Picasso to create Cubism, a revolutionary artistic movement that shattered established conventions of representation. The Cubist method of fragmenting objects and seeing them from different perspectives conveys a sensation of motion and energy. The early Cubist works by Braque used subdued color palettes and a concentration on still-life elements like musical instruments and bottles.
Braque was one of the most honored artists of the 20th century. He became one of the most acclaimed painters of the twentieth century by experimenting with new techniques and approaches after World War II. Braque died in Paris in 1963, leaving behind a body of work as a model of creativity and experimentation in modern art. The iconic Cubist painting “Still Life with a Guitar” by Georges Braque was created in 1919 (O’Brien 31). The picture perfectly illustrates the Cubist method of representation, which entails breaking the image into relevant parts and reassembling them in new ways. Consequently, the design is shown in a fragmented, multi-perspective manner, emphasizing the object’s main characteristics rather than giving it a genuine aspect.
A Detailed Analysis of “Still Life with a Guitar”
Georges Braque’s “Still Life with a Guitar” is a masterpiece of the Cubist movement, which revolutionized the art world in the early 20th century. Braque demonstrates his mastery of the Cubist technique of fragmentation and reassembly in order to attain a sense of depth and movement (Chao 25). In order to achieve the effect of fragmentation, Braque broke down the image into a series of geometric forms and then reassembled them in a way that created a completely new experience for the audience.
Braque achieved such a result by resorting to a limited palette of colors and arranging the forms within a three-dimensional space. Braque showed the guitar from different angles while also placing the numerous elements of the still life in a moving manner (O’Brien 34). This technique reflected Braque’s technical skill and also represented a visually engaging artifact that could lead to the audience being intellectually stimulated by the variety of forms and objects.
One of the important ideas that are conveyed through the interface of “Still Life with a Guitar” is the importance of craftsmanship and the fact that the artist’s relationship to their materials and tools is a crucial part of the creative process. In line with fundamental cubist practices, Braque used a variety of materials, including oil paint, canvas, and collage elements, such as newspaper and wallpaper (Kangaslahti 43). The application of the techne theory could be informed by a variety of tools, such as brushes and knives, as the latter were utilized to create different textures and effects.
The connection between techne theory and Braque’s manifesto could be defined as strong due to the use of collage elements. The latter reflected his innovative method of engaging with artistic materials (Adamson 16). Traditional art notions were challenged by Braque in an attempt to incorporate fragments of everyday life into his work. Thus, he inspired a new approach to the use of materials in art.
Conclusively, techne theory emphasizes the idea that artistic creation is a social activity. In turn, it creates a premise for the idea that an artist’s relationship with their community is an integral part of the creative process (Staten 36). In the case of Cubism, “Still Life with a Guitar” embodies experimentation and the willingness to broaden the horizons of human art.
The fact that Braque worked closely with his friend and fellow artist, Pablo Picasso, shows that techne theory could be applied to Braque’s manifesto. The artist’s approach allowed for the development of new forms and styles and fostered a sense of innovation and creativity within the Cubist movement (Staten 37). Eventually, this manifesto became one of the main reasons for the development of subsequent movements, such as futurism, constructivism, and surrealism.
An Overview of Techne Theory in Art
Significance of Techne Theory in Art and Philosophy
Techne theory plays a vital role in shaping ideas within both art and philosophy., as it provides a framework for understanding the relationship between technology, creativity, and culture. This fixation on the importance of skill and practical knowledge in the production of art and technology is vital because it contributes to the process of artists challenging traditional views of art (Charles and Podoksik 60). From seeing them as purely aesthetic, the audience could elevate to a level where they would note the role of technology in shaping humans’ cultural and social lives.
Again, the core emphasis should be placed on the prominence of craft and skill. Conventionally, art has been viewed as a form of assertiveness or a way of reconnoitering abstract concepts and ideas (Sennett 69). Nevertheless, techne theory revisits this concept because practical knowledge cannot be eradicated from the process of creating art. The course of developing an artifact is rooted in the application of specific methods that have to be based on real-life knowledge.
Such emphasis on craft and skill has led to a renewed interest in traditional art forms such as painting, sculpture, and printmaking. The development of new technologies stopped being a mere innovation-inducing force because of the close relationship between modernization and culture, especially when cutting-edge technology was involved (Sennett 56). As such, techne theory challenged traditional views of technology as a neutral or objective tool. The idea here is that the perception of reality employed by humans can be informed by social and cultural factors that are also reflected in the ethics of applying technology to various areas of human existence (Jacobs 76). This has led to a growing occurrence of debates about the role of technology in society and its impact on the environment.
Another vital reason to review techne theory in line with art and philosophy is the relationship between art, technology, and science. Former delimitations were successfully removed, making it safe to say that the fields of technology, art, and philosophy were interrelated (Staten 38). At this point, techne theory challenges this view by emphasizing the role of technology and practical knowledge in the production of both art and science. The close connection between science and art cannot be ignored because innovation and creativity inform the development of human-made artifacts.
Accordingly, technology shapes people’s cultural and social lives while also challenging traditional outlooks on culture as a static entity (Wilhelm 526). Quite contrarily, culture has to be perceived as a dynamic and constantly evolving system of beliefs, values, and practices, with technology being one of the cornerstone parts of this system. This is why new forms of art tend to appear rather often, sparking interest in popular culture studies and new approaches to using technology in creative and culturally informed ways.
It can be safe to say that techne theory has significant implications for both art and philosophy, as it challenges the purely aesthetic nature of art and the inherent neutrality of technology. The emphasis on craft, skill, and practical knowledge is vital, but it has to be aligned against the use of technology in production. Both art and technology are dependent on the dynamics of the relationship between culture and innovation.
Ultimately, techne theory has the potential to reshape people’s understanding of art, technology, and society. Braque’s manifesto is one of the main reasons why Cubism became so popular if one does not consider Picasso’s well-renowned persona. This is why new insights have to be collected to understand the role of creativity and innovation in shaping humans’ sociocultural pillars of existence. Art comes in different shapes and sizes, which makes the peculiarities of Cubism essential when linking it to techne theory.
Criticism of Techne Theory
There are three particular reasons to criticize techne theory when looking at it as a part of the context for the cubist movement. First of all, techne theory places too much emphasis on craft and skill and not enough on other important aspects of art and technology, such as aesthetics, meaning, and social context (Tuckwell 92). It can be argued that various sets of methods and techniques perceived as art can lead to sociocultural contexts being ignored. Hence, techne theory can be seen as exaggeratedly reductive and simplistic.
Another criticism of techne theory is that it ignores the role of power and politics in the production and use of technology and art. Consequently, art cannot be a mere product of individual skill and creativity but rather an artifact shaped by a range of social, cultural, and political forces (Elder 19). The third criticism of techne theory is that it does not adequately account for the impact of technology on the environment. While this outlook is the least prevalent, there is an opinion that technology is not only a cultural and social phenomenon but also a significant contributor to negative environmental consequences (Bordwell 58). In a sense, techne theory can be seen as insufficiently attentive to the ecological implications of technology and art.
Cubism Beyond the Techne-esque Correctness and Genius
Limitations of Techne Theory in Cubism
Techne theory has been influential in shaping people’s understanding of the relationship between technology, art, and culture. Nevertheless, if one applies the techne theory to the concept of Cubism, several limitations arise. First of all, techne theory might fall short of expressing the innovative essence of Cubism. Even though techne theory focuses on craft and techniques in art and technology, it may not capture the creative nature of Cubism and its revolutionary practices (Staten 10).
Primarily, this becomes true when one perceives Cubism as a radical departure from traditional representational art. The movement challenged established norms of composition, perspective, and color. Hence, various innovations paved the way for later avant-garde movements, but they are often overshadowed by the general reputation of cubist artists. While techne theory can help the audience understand the techniques and materials used by cubist artists, it may not fully seize the trailblazing nature of their work.
Another potential limitation that can affect one’s outlook on Cubism is that techne theory may not fully capture the intellectual and philosophical underpinnings of Cubism. The movement developed by Braque and Picasso did not focus on visuals only, but it also reinforced the importance of the philosophical foundations of one’s art (Charles and Podoksik 55). Therefore, there were numerous sources of influence, such as mathematics and science, that affected how the audience perceived the ambiguity and complexity of the modern world.
At this point, techne theory could be seen as a limitation for the cubist artist because the latter would have to display their skill without expecting the audience to grasp the intellectual value of their craft (Sennett 61). Philosophical keystones of Cubism cannot be left disengaged because a thorough understanding of this art style requires people to bear the intellectual and rational context of the given works. This makes the inclusion of techne theory relatively unnecessary.
The third limitation that can be associated with the techne theory is that the latter may not fully capture the social and political dimensions of Cubism. The context of the 20th century required artists to go beyond sociopolitical upheavals and focus on a different type of craft (Staten 12). Hence, it became the primary reason for the advent of cultural and social debates that involved cubist artists in politics.
Unfortunately, techne theory does not cover art-related peculiarities from the point of policymaking, making it impossible to understand the more profound engagement with technology. In this case, it is also vital to claim that techne theory does not fully capture the culture of exchange and collaboration. It means that the individual genius of cubist artists was inferior to the complex network of their cooperative efforts (Zhao 64). At this point, techne theory may not be able to capture any phases of the collective nature of Cubism as it mainly pertains to craftsmanship and individual skills.
The ultimate limitation of techne theory in Cubism is that the relationship between the artistic movement and the broader historical and cultural contexts may not be tangible. When Cubism emerged, it was highly affected by a particular historical and cultural context where a series of cultural and social forces existed (Chao 25). Accordingly, an artist’s techniques can be unrelated to technological innovations and vice versa, leaving little to no room to draw parallels between the cubist movement and techne theory. Again, a deeper engagement could be enhanced when creating links between technological progress and cubist artifacts.
The Influence of Individual Genius on Cubism
While a collective and collaborative approach characterized the Cubist movement, individual artists played a significant role in shaping the direction and aesthetic of Cubism. Braque and Picasso could be considered the biggest frontrunners of the movement due to the profound impact they had on the development of the artistic qualities of Cubism (Tamang 32). Despite the collaborative relationship between the two, it can be claimed that individual genius was the primary reason for the growing popularity of Cubism and the exceptionally high quality of artifacts produced by both artists.
Nevertheless, Picasso was an artist who had already established himself as a master of traditional representational art before turning to Cubism. Hence, it is even more important to note how Picasso’s cubist efforts helped him to step away from the early works that could be characterized by a classical style that drew on the art of ancient Greece and Rome (Wilhelm 527). The deep dissatisfaction with traditional forms of representation led Braque and Picasso to experiment with new ways of depicting the world. Individual genius, in this case, could be linked to how close experiments with form and perspective laid the groundwork for the future of Cubism.
Despite being a lesser-known artist, Braque could be considered an example of how individual genius shaped the development of an influential artist. The potential of Cubism recurrently motivated Braque to collaborate with Picasso and explore the possibilities associated with the new artistic movement (Kangaslahti 45). The principles of Cubism did not rely solely on the need to follow techne theory, as artistic influences still had to be considered for better results. Braque’s talent and unique vision contributed to deploying a distinctive aesthetic that could be described as intellectually appealing. The cubist movement benefited from the individual genius of its creators because personalized approaches to art were quickly disseminated across Europe to contribute to the development of constructivism and futurism.
The individual genius of Braque and Picasso, as the frontrunners of Cubism, helped to establish the new artistic movement as a significant cultural and artistic crusade of the early 20th century. However, several slight limitations can be associated with the cubist movement as a means of promoting individual genius. Broader cultural and intellectual contexts have to be discussed when dwelling on Cubism to recognize the role of each individual artist conducive to the movement while highlighting their collaboration (Charles and Podoksik 28). This duality makes it even more important to appreciate the individual genius of Braque and go beyond the mere application of the techne theory when analyzing artistic perspectives and experiences. Even specific intellectual and cultural biases cannot take away from the significance of individual genius because personal talents were the primary catalyst for the quick distribution of the Cubist movement (Bordwell 34). This idea is crucial when examining how Braque’s and Picasso’s collaborative efforts compare to their individual exertions.
The Role of Creativity and Innovation in Cubism
One of the fundamental reasons to look at creativity and innovation as moving forces of Cubism is the fact that the followers of the movement rejected traditional forms of art representation in an attempt to develop an entirely new method of depicting the world. Unique artistic expressions were required to create more room for experimentation and broaden the horizons of artistry (Chao 26). Hence, Cubism could be defined as an attempt to free innovation to reproduce the world using forms that do not resemble natural shapes. Cubism appeared as an alternative form of creativity to help artists use their imagination to develop extraordinary art objects while using arguably mundane shapes.
The spirit of innovation was supported by cubists by the implementation of geometric forms everywhere throughout their art. It was essential for these artists to develop multiple perspectives and look at the same objects from several different angles. Fixed viewpoints were replaced by their dynamic alternatives, and this approach stemmed from the idea that several points of view tend to appeal to the audience much more than a single-fold representation of the object (Wilhelm 529).
Hence, Cubism was expected to excite the audience instead of simply showcasing the artist’s mastery. Cubists utilized new color palettes and forms to generate abstract compositions that were complex enough to have the audience engage in thought-provoking activities. Experiments with mixed media also contributed to striking visual effects and creative ways of presenting objects to the audience.
Another vital finding that cannot be ignored when dwelling on Cubism and its creative roots is the fact that collaboration between Cubists led to numerous experiments. Shared ideas and techniques became a groundbreaking approach to creating artifacts, with cubists constantly pushing the boundaries. The audience was in search of something exciting as well, making cubists’ quest for innovation and ingenuity even more critical (Elder 63). The partnership between Braque and Picasso contributed to the development of Cubism and created room for new techniques that could turn Cubism into an innovative form of art. This collaboration was instrumental in the profound impact of the movement on people’s expectations and outlooks on art.
Ultimately, the influence of other cultures added to the value of the cubist movement and its innovativeness. For example, Braque and Picasso largely referenced African art in their works due to the striking forms and bold lines that have never been used by traditional European artists (Wilhelm 530). Even though this approach was somewhat radical, the artists’ willingness to experiment and innovate became a testament to the influential nature of Cubism. Other artistic disciplines began looking into the cubist movement to see how innovation and creativity could transform the entire culture. Altered representations of the world became exceptionally important for Cubism due to the plasticity of human imagination and how Cubists could operate it to express or cause specific emotions.
Conclusion
It can be safe to state that techne theory can be applied to works of cubist artists, including Georges Braque because it emphasizes the importance of artistic technique and craft. The theory’s premise suggests that skilled labor is superior to creativity and innovation. Therefore, in the case of Cubism, this emphasis on technique and craft was evident in the use of geometric forms, multiple perspectives, and complex compositions.
As one of the key figures contributing to the development of Cubism, Georges Braque was the key promoter of the principles of techne theory. Braque was highly skilled in using materials and techniques and approached his art with scientific rigor that reflected the influence of his training. It was essential for the cubist pioneer to experiment with a range of materials and techniques in his pursuit of new forms of expression.
It is crucial to note that Braque’s approach to art was highly analytical. The artist never ceased to appeal to the audience by using multiple perspectives and fragmented forms. In line with the techne theory, Braque’s cubist art reflected a deep engagement with the principles of innovation. Thus, his work represented a synthesis of the technical and creative aspects of art.
Based on the evidence obtained within the framework of the current paper, it can be claimed that Cubism contributed to creativity and innovation in art in several ways. For example, the movement became the first art form that challenged traditional formulae of creative representation. The amalgamation of cubism and techne theory encouraged artists to explore new ways of seeing and depicting the world. Thus, the idea of reproducing reality without alterations was rejected by cubist movement representatives to create a new visual language. The latter was expected to help artists portray the complexities and dynamism of the modern world.
More importantly, Cubism goes beyond mere genius and the implementation of technologies and techniques because it promotes artistic innovation and cooperative creation. This approach can generate new forms and styles while instilling a sense of innovation and creativity within the movement. Braque’s “Still Life with a Guitar” became an essential artifact because of its connection to other artistic disciplines, including architecture, design, and fashion.
In addition to the importance of geometric forms, Braque also emphasized the role of multiple perspectives and broke down the existing boundaries between disciplines. The importance of artistic technique and craft cannot be perceived without paying attention to the fundamental postulates of techne theory. Braque’s manifesto exemplified these principles by means of a deep engagement with the technical and creative aspects of art. Overall, Cubism contributed to creativity by encouraging experimentation and collaboration among artists while challenging them to step away from conventional art forms and inspire new styles in other artistic disciplines.
Works Cited
Adamson, Glenn. The Invention of Craft. Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
Bordwell, David. The Cinema of Eisenstein. Routledge, 2020.
Chao, Xu. “The Symbolic Meaning and Interpretation of Cubist Painting.” Structure, vol. 4, no. 3, 2022, pp. 24-27.
Charles, Victoria, and Anatoli Podoksik. The Ultimate Book on Picasso. Parkstone International, 2019.
Defeyt, Catherine, et al. “New Insights on Picasso’s Blue Period Painting La Famille Soler.” Studies in Conservation, vol. 63, no. 1, 2018, pp. 24-35.
Elder, R. Bruce. Cubism and Futurism: Spiritual Machines and the Cinematic Effect. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2018.
Jacobs, April Richon. “Charles G. Shaw: Works.” The Park Avenue Cubists. Routledge, 2018. 75-78.
Kangaslahti, Kate. “Braque, Gris, Léger: Cubism in Switzerland in 1933.” Monographic Exhibitions and the History of Art. Routledge, 2018. 38-53.
Munch, Anders V. “Embracing Cubism. Poul Henningsen’s Negotiations of Danish National Traditions and International Modernism.” Art History, vol. 43, no. 2, 2020, pp. 284-307.
O’Brien, Dan. “Cubism: Art and Philosophy.” ESPES, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, pp. 30-37.
Sennett, Richard. The Craftsman. Yale University Press, 2008.
Staten, Henry. Techne Theory: A New Language for Art. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Susik, Abigail. “Art History Hacked: Art Hack Practice as an Intra-Garde.” Art Hack Practice. Routledge, 2019. 15-22.
Tamang, Nem Bahadur. “Distortion of Forms and Subjects in Paul Cezanne’s Paintings.” Journal of Fine Arts Campus, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, pp. 31-34
Tuckwell, Jason. Creation and the Function of Art: Techné, Poiesis and the Problem of Aesthetics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Wenderski, Michał. “The ‘Isms’ of Modern Art: Belgium, the Netherlands, and Beyond.” Dutch Crossing, vol. 44, no. 3, 2020, pp. 305-313.
Wilhelm, Randall. “The Great War in Disguise: Faulkner, Cubism, and Camouflage.” Mississippi Quarterly, vol. 72, no. 4, 2019, pp. 521-536.
Zhao, Yaling. “An Analysis of the Inspiration of Cubist Painting on Contemporary Graphic Design.” Highlights in Art and Design, vol. 2, no. 2, 2023, pp. 62-65.