Introduction
Many of the most popular social problem films combine concentrated issues with directorial viewpoints that are distinct, strong, and unique. Don Hardy and Dana Nachman’s (2013) attempted to produce such a documentary titled “The Human Experiment.” The film begins by drawing out the scope of the chemicals affecting health through interviews with persons who have experienced chemically connected medical problems and physicians who have studied them. The story quickly shifts to the broader scenario’s social and economic dynamics at work. In its latter part, the video shifts from highlighting the problems to demonstrating how some of them can be addressed.
Lessons Learnt from Documentary “The Human Experiment”
I have learned about the connection between corporations’ actions and the presence of dangerous chemicals in the environment. These chemicals ended up in the atmosphere, rivers, oceans, and ground due to the fact they were advantageous for the firms who promoted them (Hardy & Nachman, 2013). Any substances that existed before the initial attempts at state regulation were essentially allowed back in, making their usage unchallengeable, while new materials were introduced without practice standards or monitoring. When activists began investigating their ties to numerous problems, the firms prioritized money before public health and safety, erecting public relations false narratives to obstruct public knowledge and government involvement. From spreading skepticism about the scientific evidence to developing their own fraudulent research and experts, the corporations portrayed themselves as advocates of individual freedom, claiming that adopting their products was a matter of personal preference. Admittedly, they were able to spend far more funds on campaigning their agenda than their competitors, green activists.
I have acknowledged that humanity has already begun to realize the environmental issues and attempt to prevent them on a large scale. Europe has risen to prominence internationally in limiting environmental dangers and forcing chemical producers to verify the sustainability of their goods before they are adopted (Hardy & Nachman, 2013). Numerous non-European governments have examined these programs, and as a consequence, their pattern has taken place in countries such as far Asia, where ecological issues are the most eminent.
The film’s ideas and facts are presented in detail, and, as a result, it becomes captivating and informative for audiences who care more about practical information than artistic display. “The Human Experiment” might feel repetitive for most of its runtime since one watches a sequence of boringly filmed media people discussing one chemically-related topic after the other. However, the film does a vital implication about the seemingly disconnected illnesses, portraying them successfully as additions to a wide assortment of maladies that experts have connected to environmental causes. Some facts have surprised me as an American, such as finding that China has superior environmental safeguards to the United States.
Conclusion
“The Human Experiment” is perhaps the most appealing by presenting how many ordinary Americans in various locations become worried about environmental issues after being directly affected by them. I have appreciated the demonstration of how they enlighten themselves and begin working with relatives, community members, and compassionate politicians to transform the state legislation. It is an encouraging illustration of active social protest against evil. Promoting understanding of the problems and possible responses is an essential part of any democratic process, and “The Human Experiment” is an effective instrument for anyone engaging in complex conflicts about health and safety.
Reference
Hardy, D. & Nachman, D. [Documentary For Better World]. (2017). The Human Experiment (2013) chemicals documentary [Video]. YouTube.