The general objective of every political system is to rationalize several evident imperfections in most governments. Every single undertaking by the human race is comparative. A comparison of different forms of government is, therefore, significant in judging and testing the diverse set of organizations.
In regards to this, the best form of government should consider the well-being of any state that subsists in the regime. The best form of government ought to protect the nation’s welfare and display little defectiveness because almost all organizations are imperfect (CCH Australia 30).
Further, the best institution gives improved affinities to the nature of the human race. These include the utmost and continuous stimulus as well as occupied political scope that reduces the inferior tendencies and opportunities of malice. Given the above, charging democracy aright requires its comparison to the other systems of government. The other forms may provide a better substitute to democracy as was evident in the primeval and the contemporary world (Duignan 100).
Monarchy and Oligarchy as compared to Democracy
The monarchial form of government at times seems to be easier to follow and is stable. It offers a reliable and incessant policy to overseas relations like the democratic systems (Pitney and Bassette 4). Besides, both monarchial and democratic forms ponder a well-organized domestic organization. This emanates from the verge of austere responsibility and free rein in the choice of skilled bureaucrats.
The citizens submit to a solitary ruling head in monarchial forms of government, thus enabling the entire national services to be equally fixed to each other just like in democracies. Monarchial forms of government more or less cloud with democracies as it creates for integrity between the social orders.
The form is unprejudiced and perhaps compassionate to the citizens whose interests are shared with their leaders. However, all these merits claimed by the monarchies are not sustained by history. The monarchies are on the complete more inclined to hostility and conflict despite having variables as those of democratic forms.
The lethal objection to the monarchial system is that it may lead the nation into poverties due to autocracy. This is counter to the democratic government where leaders develop strongly to rule democratically. On the other hand, dictatorial forms of government merit both the other alternative forms. In comparison with democracies, oligarchies agonize in the hands of the traditional principle.
The different types of oligarchies include partial administration by the military, and the reverence sensed for birth, like in the case of feudal plutocrats of the medieval European nations. The democracies are however ruled by the elected leaders but not by the feudal tycoons whose tenant vassals are concerned with rendering the country-dwellers weaker. The administration and aristocracy of Prussia, as well as the 18th Century’s French and British nobilities, provide the best comparison in this case (Ulrich 36).
Conversely, the oligarchy has some patent advantages as compared to democracies. The form has demonstrated that it can create an extremely steady government like that of a democratic state. Similar to the democratic nations, oligarchies are capable of fielding tenacious foreign concerns and hunt for dependable policy while respecting the ethical values. Nonetheless, the morals of skillfulness and knowledge are best assumed in the oligarchy that in democratic forms of government hence noble organization.
Dictatorship sometimes keeps the democratic notion of caring for the substantial welfare of citizens (Duignan 105). The problems of oligarchy, however, outweigh its merits as compared to democracy whose benefits overshadow its demerits. As opposed to democracy, the class rule is audacious, arrogant, and egocentric in the other forms. Consequently, the statute is disgraced, and the government suffers from the disunion of groups formed due to distrust and contentions from the ruling races.
The democracies experience little violence as compared to authoritarianism and monarchial forms of government. The other forms of government enable conspiracies that distract and weaken the government by forfeiting mixed interests, distorting admin, and delaying legislation. They also encourage corruption owing to the prevalent soul of self-interest, lack logical accountability, and mystery of governance. The democratic government has certain flaws, like any other forms of government.
For instance, democracy sluggishly recognizes the economy in regards to finance administration and governmental skills. The other systems of government draw out considerable dimensions like the democratic forms even though not openly. The diverse forms of governments might face several restrictions, and public disapproval augmenting from fear of social censure (Ulrich 28). For this reason, the different forms of governments differ with only little similarities noticed while comparing.
The democratic system as the best form of government
In a personal view, the democratic form of government is the best system that can meet the criteria of peoples’ rule. Indeed, this system means the rule of people from one nation destined for the very people and by the people themselves. The democratic form of government allows for equal participation of all the entitled inhabitants to take part in government functions. The participation can take place openly through the elected legislative body.
Similarly, democracy proves to be the best form as it works better than the other known system of government. In spite of democracy working extremely gracefully, it has particular faults. Therefore, democracy comes with countless benefits for the organizations employing it (Duignan 52).
The democratic form of government encourages free will and social equality. Social equality embodies the notions and opinions of every populace in whichever nation state regardless of their interest group and differences. Moreover, democracy provides for a healthier mode of solving the problems emanating from squabbles or skirmishes. Democracy, make the self-worth of citizens available in any country. As a result, it permits several individuals to rule the nation through representation.
It consents individuals to express their grievances liberally and openly without any intimidation besides promoting and respecting human rights ((Pitney and Bassette 3). All the folks are equally represented before the law in this system of government given that the citizens are entitled to the free will of voicing their outlooks. Hence, democratic system of government provides for a better form as compared to the other forms like oligarchy and monarchy.
Conclusion
Several republics claim to have embraced democracy in the contemporary world. Nevertheless, the federations’ remains in the same state as in the other forms of government once the inhabitants are sidelined in political or governmental functions. It is important for the governments to meet the standards for democracy to balance the powers.
Accordingly, democracy is the preferred and best form of government in the present world. Thus, democracy tends to carry the day provided that it speedily grasps the belief that it is present for the entire populaces and renders its bureaucrats rightly answerable to the citizens all-inclusive.
Works Cited
CCH Australia. Introducing the Law. North Ryde, NSW: CCH Australia Limited, 2011. Print.
Duignan, Brian. Forms of Government and the Rise of Democracy. London, UK: Britannica Educational Publishing, 2012. Print.
Pitney, John and J. Bassette. American Government and Politics: Deliberation, Democracy and Citizenship. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.
Ulrich, Bartow. A Comparison between the Forms of Government of the Representative Democracy, Or Republic of the United States, and Those of Other Nationalities: Show. Charleston, South Carolina: BiblioBazaar, 2010. Print.