Introduction
The development of symptoms of eating disorders is a cause for concern since this health problem can become a serious risk factor. The article by Crawford and Brandt (2018) tells about the dangers of such a problem and why public authorities should pay more attention to the issue of control over the population’s eating habits. As the evidence of the relevance of the issue raised, it can be noted that the physiological outcomes of misbalance in the digestive system are fraught with dangerous consequences. Therefore, relevant interventions can be useful, and the positions of the stakeholders deserve at least a discussion.
Justification of the Need to Resolve the Issue
The opinion on the need to take urgent measures to address health problems caused by eating disorders has a theoretical and statistical justification. For example, according to Crawford and Brandt (2018), eating disorders are “the third most common chronic illness in adolescents” (para. 14). As a consequence, a number of appeals to the country’s authorities were held. The initiators made a petition to the representatives of the Senate and also appealed to the former head of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Nevertheless, the statements of the activists did not have sufficient influence on the officials, and no significant measures were taken even after providing the substantiation of the danger of the problem. However, the issue raised by the initiators should be considered since, judging by their assurances, the situation regularly deteriorates, and “every 62 minutes, someone dies as a direct result of an eating disorder” (Crawford & Brandt, 2018, para. 19). Therefore, the discussion of the intervention should be started as soon as possible to stop the problem.
Causes of Disagreements
The primary reason for the disagreement was that the position of the authorities did not coincide with the opinion of the supporters of urgent interventions. According to the healthcare representative, eating disorders cannot be considered such a dangerous problem to take many efforts, and therefore, this ailment was excluded from the list of potentially dangerous ones. Nevertheless, as the authors note, over the past two years since the signing of this law, the changes have taken a toll, and the need for intervention is obvious (Crawford & Brandt, 2018). Moreover, the statistics provided by researchers demonstrates the urgent need for information dissemination among the population and psychological assistance to those in need. However, judging by the words of official representatives, all the data on the indicated problem can be found in free access on various online platforms. Such an approach to protecting the population can hardly be considered successful since the decision to take appropriate measures and group all available information in one place for conducting a complex intervention would be a more sensible solution. It is these disagreements that have become the cause of the contradictions, and the position of supporters of taking urgent measures looks convincing enough.
Conclusion
Thus, the problem of eating disorders is relevant and significant, and the discussion of ideas can be considered not only at the local but also at the state level. The elimination of the indicated problem from the list of potentially dangerous diseases has led to gaps in this area, and the ailment itself did not disappear. Comprehensive assistance to those in need can help to improve the situation in the country.
Reference
Crawford, S. F., & Brandt, H. A. (2018). 30 million people will experience eating disorders – The CDC needs to help. The Hill. Web.