Providers of an Electronic Health Record
Epic Systems Company
Epic Systems Company, situated in Verona, Wisconsin, is a privately held software firm launched by Judy Faulkner in 1979. Hospitals, university medical institutes, and ambulatory care groups use the program (Holmgren & Apathy, 2022). The Mayo Clinic, the Cleveland Clinic, and Johns Hopkins Medicine are among the firm’s clients.
Cerner Corporation
Cerner Corporation is a publicly traded firm based in North Kansas City, Missouri. Neal Patterson, Paul Gorup, and Cliff Illig formed the firm in 1979. Healthcare providers ranging from tiny physician offices to big hospitals and health systems utilize the company’s software (Ehwerhemuepha et al., 2022). The Children’s National Health System, AdventHealth, and Kaiser Permanente are among the company’s clientele.
Allscripts
Allscripts, located in Chicago, Illinois, is a publicly listed firm launched in 1986 (Frisina et al., 2020). Hospitals, health systems, and medical clinics use the program. Northwell Health, UCSF Health, and Montefiore Medical Center are among the company’s clientele.
Criteria for Selection of an Electronic Health Record
User-Friendliness
When selecting an electronic health record (EHR), it is critical to examine its usability. The program should be simple to use, allowing healthcare practitioners to access and record information easily (Frisina et al., 2020). A user-friendly design can help you save time and avoid mistakes.
Customization
Every healthcare company has its own set of requirements and procedures. As a result, the Electronic Health Record should be adaptable, allowing healthcare practitioners to adjust it to their specific needs. In order to be considered interoperable, the EHR must be able to communicate and exchange data in real time with other healthcare systems (Frisina et al., 2020). This could improve the standard of treatment and patient safety.
Data Security
Electronic health records should have strong security measures in place to protect patient information from unauthorized access, theft, or breaches.
Cost
The cost of an Electronic Health Record varies substantially. It is critical to evaluate not just the initial investment but also the continuing maintenance and support costs (Frisina et al., 2020). The software should give a decent return on investment while being cheap to the healthcare institution.
References
Ehwerhemuepha, L., Carlson, K., Moog, R., Bondurant, B., Akridge, C., Moreno, T., Gasperino, G., & Feaster, W. (2022). Cerner real-world data (CRWD) – a de-identified multicenter electronic health records database. Data in Brief, 42, 108120. Web.
Holmgren, A. J., & Apathy, N. C. (2022). Assessing the impact of patient access to clinical notes on clinician EHR documentation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(10), 1733–1736. Web.
Frisina, P. G., Munene, E. N., Finnie, J., Oakley, J. E., & Ganesan, G. (2020). Analysis of end-user satisfaction with electronic health records in college/University Healthcare. Journal of American College Health, 70(3), 717–723. Web.