Expected Outcomes
Various forms of sexual dysfunction such as premature ejaculation can be explained by different factors. It is believed that they can be physiological and psychological (Durand & Barlow, 2009, p. 361).
Therefore, different forms of therapy can be of some use patients who have to cope with this disorder (Durand & Barlow, 2009, p. 361). It is possible to identify several possible outcomes of this research.
In particular, some of the patients, who will be involved in the study, may not benefit from the medical therapy that will be offered to them. This is one of the responses that they can give. However, these people will not be in the majority. This hypothetical result can be explained by two importance circumstances.
First of all, the sample population will include people whose ranges between18 to 50. Their sexual dysfunction cannot always be explained only by physiological factors (Heffner & Schust, 2010, p. 75).
One should also concentrate on the psychological mechanisms of this disorder. Apart from that, the participants will not have other co-morbidities that could be the underlying cause of sexual dysfunction (Leiblum, 2007). These are the main factors should be considered.
Nevertheless, one can still argue that pharmacotherapy is very likely to bring some benefits to the patients. Numerous empirical studies suggest that there are medications can be effective for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (O’Donohue & Fisher, 2009, p. 608; Carroll, 2009).
Therefore, one can hardly expect that this research will completely undermine the findings of other scholars. It is possible to assume that many patients will report high levels of comfort after receiving medication. This is another result that one can expect. However, this conjecture should be confirmed in an empirical way.
Furthermore, this study will involve medical workers. These professional often work with people who have different forms of sexual dysfunction. Their opinions will be informative; moreover, they are based on the empirical evidence provided by researchers.
It is possible that these people will express various opinions about the causes of this disorder and the effectiveness of various treatment modes.
At this point, there is no consensus among medical workers regarding the best of way of treating premature ejaculation. This is another prognosis that can be made. Nevertheless, it can prove to be inaccurate.
The main strength of this research is that it will throw light on the experiences of people who have to cope with premature ejaculation. It is rather difficult to say what kind of responses that participants will give during the study.
These people may have different attitudes toward their sexual activity, and in some cases, they may give different evaluations of the effect of drugs.
This is the main issue that should be taken into account. Therefore, it is important to ask questions that can minimize the impacts of subjectivity. This is the main task that should be done properly.
This discussion suggests that this study can produce very complex results that should be accurately analyzed. Close attention should be paid to the responses of patients and their subjective evaluation of the therapy.
This is the main challenge that should be overcome. The given study can be effective provided that the answers of the participants are properly examined. In this way, one can learn more about the effectiveness of possible treatments.
Reference List
Carroll, J. (2009). Sexuality Now: Embracing Diversity. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Durand, V., & Barlow, D. (2009). Essentials of Abnormal Psychology. New York: Cengage Learning.
Heffner, L., & Schust, D. (2010). The Reproductive System at a Glance. Boston: John Wiley & Sons.
Leiblum, S. (2007) Principles And Practice of Sex Therapy. London: Guilford Press.
O’Donohue, W., & Fisher, J. (2009). Techniques of Cognitive Behavior Therapy. London: John Wiley & Sons.