Factors of Star Firms: Quality, Early Lead, and Innovation Report (Assessment)

Description of Star Firms

Just as the name suggests, star firms are those that are top-ranked in their industry. Thus, a star firm must be one that can invest and earn more in terms of its per dollar capital invested (Ayyagariet al., 2020). At the same time, it must show substantial innovation capabilities to support its operations (Ayyagari et al., 2020). This is measured by evaluating the market value of patents.

For a firm to attain that status, it must have shown significant performance, earned a reputable name to customers regarding quality, and shown higher markups that make the company respect. Even though the effective way to identify star firms is their higher markups, a firm can predict early whether it will gain the status of a star. A company is highly likely to perform better when it shows a clear sign of high quality at its early stage.

Firm’s Quality at Birth and Future Performance

When a company presents significant quality in its performance at early stages, it will likely gain a good reputation from its customers, stakeholders, and other entities responsible for its progress. This is because focusing on quality and capable strategies are critical to enhancing a firm’s products, promoting its operations, and meeting or exceeding customers’ expectations (Paul and Rosado-Serrano, 2019). It will ultimately establish a loyal customer base and generate positive word-of-mouth marketing, where customers spread the good news about the firm to others who do the same. At the same time, good quality operations and management help the firm to gain a stronger market position. It will build its brand image, survive against potential risks that might impede its performance, enhance its efficiency, and get a significant reward. This helps the firm to build a solid competitive edge and position itself for expansion and growth.

Initial Characteristics of Star Firm

Initial Firm Heterogeneity

At birth, every company tries as much as possible to attain higher growth and success. Therefore, companies grab opportunities to see them rise and be at the top. However, some qualities determine and differentiate a firm from others. This explains why some organizations will grow to realize success faster than others. Among those essential qualities that offer a company distinctive leverage to succeed is when they exhibit initial firm heterogeneity. This involves specific attributes and capabilities that other companies cannot copy or imitate to compete with them from the beginning (Ayyagari et al., 2020).

Whenever a company begins with a distinct capability, like a highly skilled set of workers or a capable leader, it is likely to develop strategic skills that help it potentially escape risks and effectively leverage its resources to build a substantial competitive advantage. Similarly, a company might have established strong technological skills or business models that other firms cannot imitate. Thus, they use the added benefit to strengthen their growth and success.

Initial Persistent Differences

In addition to a firm’s initial heterogeneity, a company might leverage its distinct capability over time. Thus, the unique qualities that it showed at the beginning continue to grow, mainly contributing to its development. For example, a company with a skilled workforce uses its capability to promote an engaging work culture, extend those traits to recruits, and continuously lure a more capable team to help it attain its expansion and development goals (Ayyagariet al., 2020).

On the other hand, a firm that began with a technological and innovative mindset continues to leverage Research and Development (R&D) initiatives to help it develop new features and enhance the qualities of its products or services. Consequently, its innovative feature helps it build a solid customer base. The point is that whenever a company can use the initial element that sets it apart from competitors, it stands a chance to continue building a unique, sustainable competitive advantage and outperform others.

Initial Differences Lasting Impact

Initial differences and unique capabilities are critical in growing into a star firm. This is because they are the defining features of success, directing the firm to what it will attain in the coming years. Most companies will stay close to the initial elements that helped them grow or overcome competition early (Paul and Rosado-Serrano, 2019).

Ultimately, continuous improvement and more effort to advance in the area can lead them to higher performance and an effective competitive edge (Paul and Rosado-Serrano, 2019). At the same time, a company’s initial differences heavily impact the potential resources it will gain. For example, a firm with an innovative culture will attract creative talents.

Historical Cases

Strategies for Building Initial Success and Market Growth

The road of building a firm to be a star one requires the establishment of various strategies. However, the only way to attain all these involves establishing a good reputation on elements like diversification, technology adoption, strategic alliances, and features. Diversification, for instance, is critical strategy firms show to overcome challenges associated with risks (Wang et al., 2020). When a company extends its operations to various sectors, it not only develops its revenues and earnings. Instead, it also insulates itself from unexpected risks that might impede its operations.

Also, star firms focus on R&D to find strategic solutions that can enhance their competitive advantage (Namazi et al., 2023). On strategic alliances, the primary aim is to expand their offerings and enter into new markets. This offers a viable way to increase their sales and expand their customer base. Technological solutions are also essential in this matter. They provide cutting-edge solutions, enhance efficiency, and promote quality. Thus, adopting technical solutions also forms part of the star firm’s strategies.

Strategies and Performance

Focusing on R&D investment and technology adoption are two significant ways star firms can drive their performance. The primary goal that can cause an organization to use these strategies is to develop more efficient and capable solutions to the firm’s operations (Namaziet al., 2023). That is where R&D investment and technology adoption chip in, offering potential ways to enhance the team’s productivity and machinery and boost productivity. At the same time, they serve a significant purpose, helping the firm improve its value to the customers as they permit the firm to innovate and remain flexible to the constantly changing customer’s needs.

Productivity Hypothesis

Productivity-Based Explanation of Superstars

The productivity hypothesis falls among the key ideas that have helped businesses succeed and gain superstar titles. It leads to what is called the winner-take-most dynamics. Based on this idea, the more productive a firm is, the more it will earn revenues and expand. For instance, adopting technological solutions helps the company use fewer resources while creating numerous quality products (Wang et al., 2020). Technology comprehensively solves complex issues, reduces waste, and enhances quality. Ultimately, a firm can offer more products while incurring a low cost of production.

On the other hand, companies that rely on traditional production processes lack the chance to use fewer resources and produce more. Thus, their variable costs remain high. In this light, firms that leverage technology and other production skills can expand and earn more than competitors.

Winner-Take-Most Dynamics Acceleration

Just like technological advancement, globalization also contributes to the idea of the winner-take-most dynamics. After all, technology is the root foundation of globalization (Wang et al.,2021). Globalization refers to the current system where markets are coming together, remain interconnected, and share almost the same values and cultural trends. When markets come together, businesses experience a surge of customers and potential buyers. However, only those that can produce more and leverage technological advancement to reduce production costs can benefit from these large markets (Wang et al., 2021). In this light, top players in the market emerge as superstars to win more customers because of their extensive reach.

The economic graph above shows how a firm’s cost structure relates to its production. The vertical axis represents the total cost of production, while the horizontal one represents the quantity the company produces. The slope downward from left to right indicates a firm’s cost structure. As it shows, the total cost of production reduces with an increase in the total quantity produced. Thus, the more a firm continues to enhance its production, the fewer costs it has to incur in the process.

Adequate Demand, Supply-Side Economies of Scale, and Rise of Star Firms

While analyzing the rise of star firms, supply-side economies exist as one of the critical factors that let companies emerge to the higher grounds. Henten and Windekilde (2022) indicate that the higher the productivity, the higher the chance to earn more due to the economies of scale. However, the rise of star firms does not solely depend on a single factor. Instead, it is an interconnected and intertwined factor supporting organizational growth. Among the most critical factors as well is demand. Organizations require demand for their products to attain significant growth. The more the company sells its product, the more it earns profit, which is critical to achieving economies of scale in production (Schwartz et al., 2018). In this light, it is impossible to guarantee that a firm with economies of scale on the supply side will eventually rise to star status.

On Demand-Side Factors: Theory of Star Firms

Demand factors are among the significant factors that help firms grow and gain a star firm status. However, it does not play alone as other factors like supply side factors also apply. Therefore, every star firm theory must consider each side’s role when they want to be successful. Demand-side factors, as well, rely on diverse factors. For instance, network effects, branding and reputation, consumer preferences and tastes, and regulatory barriers to entry (Henten and Windekilde, 2022). The network effect is a theory that explains how a service or product’s value increases as people continue to use it.

A good example can be social media platforms like Instagram. As people join this platform, they continuously develop a trend of using it to enhance their experience and offer good reviews that promote their reputation. On the other hand, regarding branding and reputation, star firms must focus on establishing a good reputation for their customers and creating a loyal customer base (Henten and Windekilde, 2022). This is critical in allowing companies to tailor their value and offerings to customers and earn good outcomes.

Moreover, the demand-side factor also includes consideration of consumer tastes and preferences. A firm can only earn a good reputation and be successful when it meets and exceeds the expectations of its customers. This means that the more a company researches and analyses what its customers require, the more it builds a good reputation and attracts more people to its products or services. Similarly, demand factors include considerations of regulatory barriers to entry. When a business sector has high regulations to deter new entrances, existing firms stand a chance to discourage competition (Cook and Billig, 2023). from these illustrations, it is clear that a firm that leverages these factors can establish a sustainable competitive advantage over its competitors.

Scale Economies

Static and Dynamic Scale Economies

Companies can experience or develop scale economies when they find strategic ways to attain cost advantage by producing more at a lower cost. Therefore, they profit by leveraging low-cost production to offer more products or services. This scale economy can occur in two types: static and dynamic scale economies. Static scale economies arise when a company can increase its production output while the cost of production decreases (Basaket al., 2022). To attain this, a firm must identify possibilities for high efficiency and the capacity to extend its fixed cost to a large sales volume. Consequently, the company can price their products at relatively lower prices, which attracts more customers to their products or services.

On the other hand, dynamic scale economies occur when a firm can experience an increase in its outputs as its product innovation increases. Ultimately, this is critical in helping the company provide lower-quality products. Therefore, the company can enjoy higher income as high outputs enhance its profit gains. Moreover, such capabilities can improve its market share as it attracts more customers and expands its offers.

These economies of scale, therefore, form part of the integral factors that can help a firm attain star status. They amplify the impacts of the company’s initial success and development strategies (Umadia and Kasztelnik, 2020). In addition, achieving significant development at their initial stage allows them to dominate the market, fight competition, and experience continuous growth. For instance, the primary factor that promotes these possibilities lies in their ability to help a company lower production prices (Umadia and Kasztelnik, 2020). Thus, it can effectively lower its product prices while earning significant profits.

Importance of the Demand-Side Scale Economies and Demand Creation

In addition to the static and dynamic scale economies, demand-side scale economies and demand creation also play a critical role in developing higher-status star firms. Basak et al. (2022) state that demand-side scale economies occur when a firm’s product becomes more valuable as more people use it. Critical factors that make this possible include positive customer reviews or network effects. For example, when more customers offer good reviews about a company’s products, the trend spreads to other users and continuously extends to different audiences. On the other hand, organizations that do not get proper customer reviews on their products find it hard to compete with those with higher customer reputations.

Similarly, demand creation is needed to attain scale economies. While companies usually rely on their customers’ demand ability of their audiences to demand their solutions or products, high-performing companies find ways to motivate that demand. This is a demand creation, where companies initiate strategies like tailored advertisement, branding, and other promotional approaches to lure more customers to their products (Basak et al., 2022). Consequently, these strategies help firms establish a strong brand and reputation, enhance product demand, and increase profitability.

Managerial Lessons: What Firms Would Do to Attain Star Status

While every company tries to attain star status, it comes at a price. Companies must be ready to implement strategic solutions tailored to enhance efficiency, quality, and a sustainable competitive edge. This requires consideration of factors like product development and constant innovation strategies. Consumer demands constantly change, and their preferences occasionally shift as they respond to current trends (Namazi et al., 2023). At the same time, critical external forces define organizational success and profitability in the market. Thus, lacking a proper way to respond and adapt to these changes deters firms from realizing their potential. However, focusing on product development and innovation helps firms identify ways to remain flexible and adaptable to changes (Namazi et al., 2023). Thus, they can effectively respond to customers’ needs or initiate strategies to overcome uncertainties.

Moreover, focusing on building a solid brand reputation and supply-side economies of scale can have the potential to gain higher status. A company’s brand is a crucial driver of customer loyalty (Umadia and Kasztelnik, 2020). it also allows firms to charge higher prices and maintain market share even in the face of competition. However, attaining this requires the company to engage in effective advertising strategies and commit to offering high-quality products (Umadia and Kasztelnik, 2020). This strategy has helped significant firms like Coca-Cola to remain on a higher status as it uses key marketing strategies and continuously enhances its product qualities. Also, increasing efficiency and spreading fixed costs over a larger volume of sales (supply-side economies of scale) helps firms to lower their prices and gain market share. Thus, they can further cost savings and enable the company to achieve higher economies of scale.

Reference List

Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2019) ‘The rise of star firms: Intangible capital and competition’, Policy Research Working Papers. Web.

Basak, S. et al. (2022) ‘Reducing production losses in additive manufacturing using overall equipment effectiveness’, Additive Manufacturing, 56, p. 102904.

Cook, G. and Billig, B. (2023) Airline operations and management a management textbook. Taylor & Francis.

Henten, A. and Windekilde, I. (2022) ‘Demand-side economies of scope in big tech business modelling and strategy’, Systems, 10(6), p. 246.

Namazi, M. et al. (2023) ‘A new strategic approach for R&D project portfolio selection using efficiency-uncertainty maps’, Benchmarking: An International Journal [Preprint]. Web.

Paul, J. and Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019) ‘Gradual internationalization vs born-global/international new venture models’, International Marketing Review, 36(6), pp. 830–858.

Schwartz, K. et al. (2018) ‘Prep communications accelerator: A digital demand creation tool for Sub-Saharan Africa’, Sexual Health, 15(6), p. 570.

Umadia Sr., K. and Kasztelnik, K. (2020) ‘The financial innovative business strategies of small to medium scale enterprises in developing country and influence for the global economy performance’, SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(3), pp. 20–32.

Wang, K.-H. et al. (2021) ‘Is technological innovation making world ‘greener’? An evidence from changing growth story of China’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, p. 120516.

Wang, Y. et al. (2020) ‘Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19’, Journal of Business Research, 116, pp. 214–220.