Introduction
The video by Tim Xeriland talks about some of the best methods of providing effective classroom assessment. In particular, the author encourages teachers to apply formative assessment in learning processes. This paper will explore Tim’s fact-findings on formative assessment. It will also compare formative assessment to summative assessment (Xeriland 1).
What the research on formative assessment found
Tim uses numerous examples to explain why formative assessment is the most effective in classrooms. Additionally, he uses various variables to exploit student needs in classrooms. According to his research, Tim finds that formative assessment is the most effective method of conducting successful learning processes. Tim uses factual events to illustrate his findings. For instance, he begins by defining formative assessment by use of an illustration. He links formative assessment to an owner of a car who takes it for inspection. He explains further that if the car fails inspection, the department of the motor vehicle provides feedback, which the owner utilizes to rectify the car before taking it, back for further inspection. In other words, he explains that such a vehicle is not taken to the junk when it fails inspection. Formative assessment works in such a way that, when a student does an assignment, the teacher gives feedback for further follow-up. Tim argues that paying attention to a teacher’s day-to-day classroom assessment is essential and pays off (Xeriland 1).
Tim takes sample students, whom he categorizes into three groups. Tim argues from research, which showed that students given grades only show little or no learning game. Additionally, a student’s interest was up and down. Similarly, research on students who were given comments only showed substantial learning games as well as a large impact on improving their interest. Moreover, research on students who were given both grades and comments showed very little or no learning game as well as the interest which was also up and down. In essence, Tim shows that formative assessment is the most effective in helping students become a part of the learning process. In essence, the research on formative assessment found that it is the most effective classroom assessment technique (Xeriland 1).
What did you think of the ID of the YouTube Clip?
The ID of the clip matches the video as well as its owners’ policy on the clip. This is an evaluation clip, which provides an evaluation of formative assessment using animations and fact-findings.
Why is an evaluation of a critical element for ID?
Evaluation is essential because it provides information on the topic of evaluation. Additionally, it distinguishes one clip from another since there are numerous clips on the website. Evaluation is therefore very essential for ID since it ensures that required results are achieved.
Compare and contrast formative and summative assessment
Some theorists have argued that summative and formative assessments work together. However, it is quite essential to note the difference between the two. Firstly, the formative assessment method is usually utilized to check students’ progress in a learning process while summative assessment is usually utilized to check the end survey of students learning the game. That is, summative assessment results evaluation against a benchmark while formative assessment results in the evaluation of student’s progress through responsiveness (Lepi 1).
Conclusion
According to Tim, formative assessment is the most effective way of improving classroom assessment. He argues that formative assessment enables students to follow up on their assignments, this works to improve performance.
Works Cited
Lepi, Katie. The Key Differences Between Summative And Formative Assessments. 2014. Web.
Xeriland, Timothy. Formative Assessment/Evaluation. 2012. Video file. Web.