Forum: The Future of Public Administration Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Becoming a model employer is a challenging task to achieve when it comes to resource distribution and recruitment and retention practices, as well as managing the costs of employee-related expenses. The role of a model employer can incorporate various obligations to the workforce. Among these are promoting diversity, union representation, effective and employee-friendly supervision, unbiased promotion, and fair compensation (Harris & Walsh, 2022; Nigro & Kellough, 2014). As the listed expenditure items suggest, the realization of the model employer project can be fraught with increases in labor costs and additional procedural protections for the public workforce, making employee termination overcomplicated. Despite changes to labor costs and protections, it is fair to anticipate governmental agencies in the U.S. to be model employers. The reason for keeping this expectation is that it would set an example of responsible staff management to private businesses, promote inclusion, and increase employee satisfaction.

To start with, expecting the completion of the model employee initiative is justified by the importance of governmental employees’ role in addressing large-scale issues affecting the nation, such as division. As the largest employee in the country, the U.S. Federal Government provides jobs to over two million people in non-postal positions (Harris & Walsh, 2022). The U.S. Federal Government regards stimulating labor union participation as one of its obligations as an employer seeking to serve as an example for others in terms of workforce protection (Harris & Walsh, 2022). As governmental agencies continue to strive for the model employer’s status by supporting labor unions, they promote collective bargaining institutions, opposing the divide et imperia approach to employer-workforce communication (Harris & Walsh, 2022). Therefore, to some degree, imposing this expectation on governmental agencies in the U.S. can address the prevalence of personal interest over the best interests of entire professional groups that contribute to the country’s well-being.

Moreover, because U.S. governments are ethically obliged to serve the public’s best interests and equality, expecting it to act as model employers, which involves investing in creating optimal conditions for employees with disabilities, is appropriate. On the one hand, political and monetary pressures on governmental employers are anticipated to intensify, urging a departure from the model employer philosophy (Nigro & Kellough, 2014). Aligning human resource plans to organizations’ larger strategic goals and current financial capacities is essential (Sifuna-Evelia, 2017). On the other hand, despite increased costs, governmental employers’ adherence to the discussed idea helps to compensate for the injustices affecting the disabled (Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion [EARN], (2020). Having a disabling condition decreases one’s satisfaction with professional growth opportunities, workplace reward fairness, organizational justice, and supervisor-employee relationships (EARN, 2020). The U.S. Federal Government understands that becoming an exemplary employer addresses these and other injustices and serves the public benefit (EARN, 2020). Considering that, the model employer approach aligns with the country’s overall orientation toward inclusion.

As the U.S. governments follow the model employer idea, especially with regard to disabled employees, they implement the biblical understanding of help, making proceeding with the idea ethically justified. Jesus, an ideal representation of sincere servitude, does not hesitate to invest time and effort into healing an innocent blind man, thus helping him to feel like others (New International Version Bible, 1978/2011, John 9:1). He mentions that “neither this man nor his parents sinned,” implying that his suffering is deeply unjust and has to be alleviated (New International Version Bible, 1978/2011, John 9:4). Figuratively, the U.S. governmental bodies’ striving for ascertaining the model employer’s status puts Jesus’s example into common practice by making sure that individuals with disabilities feel as protected as all other categories (EARN, 2020). “Giving strength to all” is one biblical principle of morally right leadership and government (New International Version Bible, 1978/2011, 1 Chronicles 29:12). Ensuring maximum protections for all public employers in spite of costs is in line with this narrative.

The determination to treat various categories of employees with similar respect will maximize the U.S. Federal Government’s role in modeling employee-friendly practices to be adopted at other levels. Relying on the National Labor Relations Act signed into power in the mid-1930s, the Federal Government emphasizes its obligation to serve as the model in terms of employee protection (Harris & Walsh, 2022). Specifically, it seeks to “model practices that can be followed by state and local governments and private-sector employers” (Harris & Walsh, 2022, p. 4). Also becoming an exemplary employer is also seen by the Federal Government as a matter of increasing the government’s overall effectiveness, which is a high-priority task per se (Harris & Walsh, 2022). The strategy’s potential significance in terms of raising employee satisfaction levels on a national scale makes following it crucial.

Therefore, despite extra expenses and changes to protections, expecting agencies in the U.S. government system to become model employers is reasonable as it would support employee satisfaction. Public employers in the U.S. will offer a model to adopt for their counterparts in the public sector. Expecting public employers to continue reaching this strategic goal can also be conducive to a climate of inclusion and non-discrimination on the national scale.

References

Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion. (2020). Author. Web.

Harris, K. D., & Walsh, M. J. (2022). White House. Web.

New International Version Bible. (2011). Biblica. (Original work published 1978).

Nigro, L. G., & Kellough, J. E. (2014). The new public personnel administration (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Sifuna-Evelia, M. (2017). Human resource management practices: A biblical perspective. Partridge Singapore.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, July 29). Forum: The Future of Public Administration. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-the-future-of-public-administration/

Work Cited

"Forum: The Future of Public Administration." IvyPanda, 29 July 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/forum-the-future-of-public-administration/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Forum: The Future of Public Administration'. 29 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Forum: The Future of Public Administration." July 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-the-future-of-public-administration/.

1. IvyPanda. "Forum: The Future of Public Administration." July 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-the-future-of-public-administration/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Forum: The Future of Public Administration." July 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/forum-the-future-of-public-administration/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1