Introduction
Moral relativism is where there are no morals that are either right or wrong. The concept in this case is focused in their relations to the social norms this paper agrees with aspect of moral relativism. In essence ethical relativism bring into focus how the various values are portrayed as evolving changing but are not absolute. The merits that come up with this concept of ethical relativism is that it brings forth a massive diverse culture and aspets as peoples culture change this aspect is able to allow for change.
On the other hand it has one disadvantage. One is that what is considered as the solemn truth justice or the concept of wrongness at all relative. Raealtisim when clearly taken into account does not carter for then prevalence of Unqualified sequence of ethics. the most important prerequisite for responsibility is decisive control. In toting up to the requirement that an individual have control over his/her behavior and the obligation that he/she have control along the correct lines, there is a necessity that the his/her control be ultimate.
Foundations of ethical relativism
Ethical relativism has to be based on the overall ideas of the individual and it has to be intrinsic such that all the necessary changes or the responsibilities can be adhered to. His/her will, must be determined by him/her self, and him/her self must not, in turn, be swayed by anything external to itself. Moral relativism entails those which are discovered rather than formed and ion this case relative aspect of truth and wrong prevail. What is considered as either being a reality or in many cases an unrealistic act is independent of nay individual since one is considered to be the sole decision maker. This is in accordance to the notions of the ethical objectivists. On the other hand the vivid description laid forward by the philosophers clearly portrays the concept on the basis of the reality of the situation. There entail more aspects of ethical objectivism and can include a number of religious opinions and certain forms of ethical egoism.
Ethical relativism brings to light that whatever one does and there is no logic in it therefore the other alternative will definitely not be right. The implication is that he/she lacks the ability to act in harmony with the true and good. In many cases there are only these two cases but an individual has only one chance of having the best alternative. Wolf clearly portrays how their entail the urge in the attainment of liberty since this can be termed as the only alternative. The concept that all individuals are away from bondage and are able to clearly compare relevant aspects to their values but not on the desired aspects. In this case therefore we are free only if our actions are guided by societal values and norms and not our personal desire.
The recommendation of an action to another person is not an ethical thing to be performed in that this has to totally embrace the views that are laid by the person being imposed upon the actions. What is clearly is that in most cases the attribution of word are usually meaningless and that the only way of attain in a solution is to foster the treatment of various parties in accordance to the standards that are raised.
One might state that somebody’s actions are not appealing to him, or that the act has offended his preferences, but not claim that other people’s actions are ethically wrong simply because one person’s actions did not satisfy him. Individuals should not lay the blame on the apparent entailment on evil in the universe owing to arguments often raised to counter the aspect of Christianity. Christianity does not deny the existence of evil, and the problem is not always simple to treaty with. In summary, his arguments against ethical objectivity are undisputable because people cannot just assume that things are wrong because it is just what they think and feel hence based on emotions.
The most important prerequisite for responsibility is decisive control. In toting up to the requirement that an individual have control over his/her behavior and the obligation that he/she have control along the correct lines , there is a necessity that the his/her control be ultimate. The control has to be base o the overall ideas of the individual and it has to be intrinsic such that all the necessary changes or the responsibilities can be adhered to. His/her will, must be determined by him/her self, and him/her self must not, in turn, be swayed by anything external to itself.
Concept of ethical relativism
From the concept of ethical relativism, human beings show evidence of moral behavior in their reactive attitudes towards the behavior of other people when they put across blame or praise for their actions. This also happens when they feel guilty and proud because of their own actions. This is enough substantiation to ascertain the presence of moral responsibility in human beings. In the real focus, for a person to be reputed as one who is aware of this or her immediate environment, the aspect of judge and factors that focus on legitimacy ought to be well pondered so as to bring the true refl; section of the person.
The concept of ethical relativism clearly portrays how event ought to be take in the contemporary world since it is the choice of an individuals judgment that has to prevail other than the mass judgment. By not having the definition of right or wrong then relativity offers a chance of freedom.
Work cited
Thomas Kent. Christianity and the determination of the real truth: A focus on relativity (2) 12-16.