Overview
The article addresses the concept of affirmative action and its artificiality when it comes to promoting diversity in the workplace. It is important to note that the given measure was effective at promoting diversity and equality among historically disadvantaged groups, such as minorities and women. However, the arguments are made that this quick-fix method is no longer reliable to elevate these groups beyond an entry-level position.
The author proposes solutions to the problem of affirmative action’s core principles, which are rooted in revising to be more suitable for practical business environments and be less artificial. In other words, “managing diversity does not mean controlling or containing diversity, it means enabling every member of your work force to perform to his or her potential” (Thomas, 1990, para. 36). The proposed measures focus on assimilating diverse groups in order to allow them to climb the corporate ladder on the basis of their merits rather than identity factors.
Key Points
The key points of the article are that the brute force method of conventional affirmative action achieved what it strived to do, which is facilitating a diverse workforce. However, it needs to adapt its approaches to enable upgrades among women and minorities rather than mere entry-level positions. Prejudices need to be addressed and not ignored in order to make use of the true benefits of diversity.
Questions Raised
- How can companies shift from artificial affirmative action toward meritocracy-based diversity?
- How can affirmative action evolve into proper diversity management?
- How can one balance equal opportunity and diversity?
Point of Discussion
The key point of discussion is to focus on changing the initial premises of affirmative action to be more focused on productivity, meritocracy and less on artificiality.
Reference
Thomas, R. R. Jr. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review. Web.