In the military, readiness training permits soldiers to structure their security ecology and anticipate federal power. The army’s readiness concentrates on ballistic missile defense, special operations, cyber defense, and interoperability with related amenities and partner states to prevent or defeat hybrid and projected security threats (Redmond et al., 2015). As a non-commissioned officer (NCO), I am accountable for soldier readiness by inspecting the army, ensuring extensive soldier fitness through the field training exercise (FTX), among other roles.
From the FTX mission case reading, the new platoon leader (PL) is not ready for his recent roles, including motivating and influencing the platoon unit to complete the mission fruitfully. Military leaders’ ability to influence soldiers’ dedication and productivity is permitted in the military and civilian society (Vrijkotte et al., 2016). The PL depends on the platoon sergeant (PSG), Newell, who possess adequate capacity about the platoon unit and is willing to guide the respective PL to ensure comprehensive military unit readiness.
Influence impacts the readiness of units within various military settings. Positive influence among military leaders such as the new PL enhances and establishes novel associations with supporting firms that help organizational readiness (Nindl et al., 2017). The new PL interacts with the platoon sergeant from the case study. The PSG provides critical information on the platoon unit that assists PL in stimulating the platoon unit readiness. For example, the platoon training publications state that all the current soldiers are on their platoon training and weapon qualification. Newell confirms that the platoon has persistently reached the training standards.
This aids the PL to comprehensively prepare the platoon unit to ensure that they achieve the relevant training standards. Therefore, based on the case study and external resources, influence impact unit readiness.
References
Nindl, B. C., Beals, K., Witchalls, J., & Friedl, K. E. (2017). Military human performance optimization and injury prevention: strategies for the 21st century warfighter. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20, S1-S2.
Redmond, S. A., Wilcox, S. L., Campbell, S., Kim, A., Finney, K., Barr, K., & Hassan, A. M. (2015). A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work, 50(1), 9-20.
Vrijkotte, S., Roelands, B., Meeusen, R., & Pattyn, N. (2016). Sustained military operations and cognitive performance. Aerospace medicine and human performance, 87(8), 718-727.