Introduction
In today’s dynamic and competitive consumer goods industry, comprehensive industry analysis is pivotal in shaping a company’s strategic decisions. Porter’s five forces, competitive profile matrix (CPM), swot analysis, and external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix are key instruments employed to evaluate the company’s competitive position and external environment. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the outside factors affecting General Mills. General Mills is a prominent player in the food industry, and thus, understanding its external environment through CPM, SWOT, and EFE enhances competitiveness.
Industry Analysis
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
Michael Porter developed Porter’s Five Forces, a strategic tool for assessing the competitive dynamics within an industry. These dynamics show the complexities of global competition as applied to General Mills. Goyal (2020), on page 149, notes the danger of new entrants and considers international variations in capital needs and regulatory frameworks as entry obstacles.
The second factor, suppliers’ bargaining power, varies according to the influence of suppliers in various nations (Goyal, 2020, p.149). Goyal (2020), on page 149, demonstrates that the variety of consumer preferences around the globe impacts buyer bargaining power. The threat of alternative items, the fourth force, fluctuates according to the choices made by consumers worldwide. Competitive rivalry, the fifth force, considers the level of competition in various marketplaces. Having a clear understanding of these aspects aids General Mills in navigating the complexities of international competition and determining its strategic choices.
It is vital to analyze Porter’s five forces and their impact on the food industry’s profitability and General Mills. Profitability is threatened by the threat of new competitors who are drawn in by economies of scale. However, Newman (2023) shows General Mills’ well-established international reach lessens this risk. Effective management of supplier power is crucial since it can impact costs and is influenced by sourcing methods.
Based on Farida and Setiawan (2022) page 2, buyers’ negotiating power is correlated with consumer preferences, emphasizing the necessity of product innovation and differentiation to retain customers. General Mills must continuously evaluate its product line because substitutes pose a risk to profitability, These factors highlight how crucial it is for General Mills to continue being vigilant and flexible despite shifting demands from the entire market to maintain and grow its profitability.
Industry Impact
When Porter’s five forces are examined basing on General Mills Inc., important information about the company’s competitors is revealed. Regarding the danger of new entrants, Kofron and DeZellar (2023), on page 3, show that General Mills enjoys advantages such as economies of scale and high capital requirements, which serve as obstacles for competitors. It may lessen this threat by concentrating on innovation and consistently releasing new goods to attract new consumers and keep existing ones. On page 2 of Kofron and DeZellar (2023), because it has many suppliers and produces standardized goods, General Mills has a competitive advantage regarding the bargaining power of suppliers. However, maintaining diverse supplier relationships and cost control are essential to ensure competitiveness.
General Mills can spend money on market research to learn more about the wants and desires of their customers, which will help them modify their product products to suit changing consumer preferences. Kofron and DeZellar (2023), on page 5 shows, show that by offering various excellent and unique products, General Mills can increase brand loyalty and decrease customers’ likelihood of choosing alternatives. According to Craft (2023), companies comparable to and rivals of General Mills include Kraft Heinz, Seneca Foods, and Kellogg. Branded consumer foods are produced and marketed by General Mills, while Kellogg produces and distributes cereals and snacks. Farida and Setiawan (2022), on page 3, how to handle this competition properly, the business must create a long-term differentiation plan that may include customer-focused programs and innovative marketing techniques. This cooperative strategy fits the ever-changing market landscape of intense rivalry and an endless search for a competitive advantage.
Competitive Analysis
Identification of Competitors
Kellogg, Kraft Heinz, and Seneca Foods are General Mills’ main rivals in the processed and packaged products sector. These businesses are viewed as competitors for several reasons. Farida and Setiawan (2022), on page 3, demonstrate that businesses in the same industry continuously watch one another’s concepts and strategies to obtain a competitive advantage. They are all in direct competition with General Mills since they are all involved in the consumer food products industry and produce and distribute a range of packaged goods, such as cereals and snacks (Kofron & DeZellar, 2023, p.2).
Porter showed that the three ways of outperforming competitors include cost leadership, differentiation, and focus on a particular customer or geographical area (Dess & Davis, 1984, p.469). Hannagan (2002), on page 145, notes that “cost leaders’ emphasis on efficiency makes them well positioned to withstand price competition from rivals.” NetMBA Business Knowledge Center (2010) shows that businesses should concentrate on the star factors in the BCG matrix to attain high-income returns. In a sector where brand awareness and customer loyalty are crucial, these companies compete for the same shelf space in supermarkets and retail stores.
Competitors’ Products and Services
Breakfast cereals from Kellogg’s are well-known for being loved by families and children. For instance, Kellogg (2022) shows that chocos and froot loops are delicious and entertaining breakfast options. These cereals have child-friendly flavors to enhance their marketing. (Kellogg, 2022) They are frequently sold in fruity or chocolate variations, which enhances the sweetness of the milk combined in the products. The main demographic Kellogg’s products target are children and parents searching for a happy, nutritious, simple breakfast choice.
Conversely, Heinz is well-known for its wide range of sauces and condiments, which include mustard products. Heinz (2020) shows that these condiments are characterized by their natural ingredients and unique, spicy flavors that enhance the taste of various foods, including burgers and hot dogs. Heinz targets a wide range of consumers, including those who value the distinct flavor enhancers.
Furthermore, based on Heinz (2020), it produces 57 Sauce, famous for its many uses and capacity to enhance the tastes of various foods. Its unique flavor and versatility make it valuable to customers who like various flavors in their food preparations (Heinz, 2020). Seneca Foods sells snack chips, canned, frozen, legumes, and vegetables (Seneca Foods, n.d.). Canned fruits and vegetables from Seneca Foods can compete with certain General Mills goods, such as canned soups or ready-to-eat meals. The market outlook for competitors such as Kellogg, Kraft Heinz, and Seneca Foods varies based on brand recognition, innovation challenges, and product range limitations.
Competitors’ Strengths and Weaknesses
When assessing the strengths and weaknesses of General Mills’ competitors, it becomes evident that each company possesses unique attributes. Hannagan (2002), on page 241, shows that market penetration encompasses finding an extra share of a firm’s existing customer base using current products. Kellogg’s is a successful company due to its well-known morning cereals and the recognition of its many other products (Kellogg, 2022). However, Schroeder (2021) shows it has challenges maintaining its workforce due to the frequent strikes.
Kraft Heinz is a well-known brand in the food sector, but it has challenges developing new ideas and adjusting to the changing needs of consumers who want organic and natural products (Heinz, 2020). Seneca Foods has a strong reputation in the canned and frozen food industries, although the company’s product range is limited Seneca Foods (n.d.). With its global reach and innovative capabilities, the company remains sensitive to regulatory changes and evolving market demands.
Key Success Factors
Several critical aspects are essential to a company’s competitiveness and long-term survival in the food sector. According to Griffin et al. (2019), these factors include product quality, supply chain efficiency, marketing and brand recognition, cost management, regulatory compliance, innovation and product development, sustainability and environmental practices, and consumer engagement. Product quality determines the customer’s willingness to buy a product, as high-standard goods are preferred. Consumer engagement is crucial for building brand loyalty and long-term success, as it fosters a deeper connection with customers, leading to increased satisfaction and a competitive edge.
Marketing and brand recognition are pivotal in influencing consumer choices and market success, with solid branding enhancing customer loyalty and competitive advantage. According to Sánchez-Flores et al. (2020) on page 2, for supply chains to be cost-effective, they need to reduce waste and maximize distribution efficiency. Pascucci et al. (2023), on page 29, show that matching the ever-changing industry requires constant experimentation with new product innovation and promotional approaches.
Based on Griffin et al. (2019), careful cost control may safeguard profitability against price swings. Lestari et al. (2021) show while strict compliance with regulations is needed, growing consumer awareness of sustainable issues necessitates more proactive measures. Understanding these factors is crucial for effectively marketing the goods within this sector.
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
A CPM is a useful management tool for comparing a company’s strengths and weaknesses to its rivals. Based on Jurevicius (2021), it gives ratings to each essential success element to assess and compare the overall competitive positions of several enterprises in an industry. According to Jurevicius (2021), CPM is created by giving each key success factor (KSF) a weight and a rating.
Every company is rated on several KSFs, which are given different weights to reflect their relative relevance when developing a CPM. The scores range from one to four points, representing the company’s effectiveness concerning each KSF. Total scores are tallied by multiplying the weight by the rating for each KSF (Jurevicius, 2021).
Based on Kofron and DeZellar (2023) page 5, General Mills maintains a strong competitive position in this CPM due to its brand recognition and consumer engagement. With a strong brand presence, Kellogg and Kraft Heinz are competitive in their domains. Seneca Foods differentiates itself with a focus on sustainability practices. Table 1 shows the CPM of General Mills in relation to its competitors.
Table 1 – Four Companies CPM.
Partial SWOT Analysis
Table 2 – Opportunities and Threats (OT) Identification.
Opportunities
General Mills has great potential to capitalize on the growing health consciousness of consumers, with more attention being paid to health and nutrition. Table 1 provides the opportunities the company can utilize and the threats it can monitor. Hannagan (2002), on page 198, shows that cooperation among firms ensures that they share their strengths and weaknesses to improve customer satisfaction.
According to Shiraz (2023), an increasing number of health-conscious customers actively look for nutritious and healthy food alternatives, and the corporation may capitalize on this trend by meeting their needs. In addition, emerging markets are an attractive prospect for General Mills’ future expansion (International Monetary Fund, 2022). Hannagan (2002), on page 241, shows that a firm can increase its sales volume by expanding its operations into a new country. The company may be able to expand its client base and strengthen its position in the market by expanding into high-growth areas in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
Due to the continuous E-commerce growth trend, General Mills may increase its customer base using digital sales channels and efficient marketing methods. Brinker (2014) writes that in marketing, organizations must have a strong understanding of technology to achieve their goals. The company’s product diversification is essential since it can meet many customers’ requirements and increase its market share. The firm’s image may be significantly improved by adopting sustainable practices to match the rising demand for eco-friendly goods and attract environmentally concerned customers.
Threats
There are several significant threats in General Mills’ business environment. Based on Konstantinidis et al. (2019), competition in the consumer products sector is fierce, with many firms fighting for a portion of the market. According to Choudhury et al. (2022), production and distribution are hampered when catastrophes such as natural disasters or pandemics interrupt the global supply chain.
Since the company’s goods need raw resources, the price of those components is susceptible to fluctuations in the market (Griffin et al., 2019). According to (Griffin et al., 2019), as consumers’ tastes and preferences change, businesses must constantly innovate to match demand. Constant attention is required to guarantee quality and safety while maintaining in line with ever-evolving industry laws and compliance requirements, which might constitute a regulatory danger.
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Analysis
Table 3 – EFE Matrix.
Discussion of EFE Matrix
The EFE matrix quantitatively analyzes an organization’s prowess in responding to opportunities and dangers in its external environment. Table 3 shows the EFE of General Mills, and this is a very crucial assessment tool. Based on Polii et al. (2019), this quantitative measure is critical for assessing how well an organization’s plans mesh with environmental conditions. When an organization’s EFE score gets close to 4, it is prepared to take advantage of favorable external possibilities and safeguard against harmful ones (Polii et al., 2019). A score close to 1 indicates the opposite, that strategy adjustment and increased receptivity to external factors are required (Polii et al., 2019).
The results of the EFE matrix are beneficial for strategic planning since they reveal the company’s competitive strengths and potential weak spots. The outcome was a score of 2.52, showing that the company can deal with the threats and utilize the opportunities. It helps prioritize opportunities and hazards, providing direction for adjusting strategies.
Conclusion
Understanding the competitive environment is essential for General Mills, and Porter’s Five Forces study does just that. General Mills’ dominant market position is shown via the CPM. Opportunities such as health awareness and growth in developing markets and threats such as increased competition and new regulations are uncovered through the SWOT analysis. General Mills’ 2.55 score on the EFE Matrix demonstrates the company’s adaptability in facing external challenges. Critical to the company’s strategic planning, these assessments help General Mills seize opportunities and avoid risks in the ever-evolving consumer products market.
References
Brinker, S. (2014). Strategy, marketing, and technology are all intertwined. Chief Marketing Technologist. Web.
Choudhury, N. A., Kim, S., & Ramkumar, M. (2022). Effects of supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19 on shareholder value. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 482–505. Web.
Craft. (2023). General Mills competitors and similar companies. Web.
Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467–488. Web.
Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 1–16. Mdpi. Web.
Goyal, A. (2020). A critical analysis of Porter’s 5 forces model of competitive advantage. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR). Web.
Griffin, R. W., Ebert, R. J., Starke, F. A., Dracopoulos, G., & Lang, M. D. (2019). Business. Pearson Canada.
Hannagan, T. (2002). Mastering strategic management. Palgrave.
Heinz. (2020). Our sauces. Web.
International Monetary Fund. (2022). Regional economic outlook for Asia and Pacific, October 2022. Web.
Jurevicius, O. (2021). Competitive profile matrix (CPM): Guide. Strategic Management Insight. Web.
Kellogg. (2022). Froot loops: Fruit-Flavored cereal. Web.
Kofron, J., & DeZellar, B. (2023). General Mills. Krause Fund Research, 1–33. Web.
Konstantinidis, C., Natos, D., & Mattas, K. (2019). Food and beverages industry competitiveness in economic turbulence. British Food Journal, 123(5), 1974–1983. Web.
Laudon, K. C. (2019). E-commerce: Business, technology, society. Boston; Columbus ; Indianapolis; Munich Pearson.
Lestari, E. R., Dania, W. A. P., Indriani, C., & Firdausyi, I. A. (2021). The impact of customer pressure and the environmental regulation on green innovation performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 733(1), 1–9. Web.
NetMBA Business Knowledge Center. (2010). The BCG growth- share matrix. Web.
Newman, J. (2023). General Mills boosts view as quarterly sales rise 13%. Wall Street Journal. Web.
Pascucci, F., Savelli, E., & Gistri, G. (2023). How digital technologies reshape marketing: Evidence from a qualitative investigation. Italian Journal of Marketing, 27–58. springer. Web.
Polii, G., Kindangen, S. D. S., & Runtulalo, N. (2019). Analysis of SWOT matrix, internal and external factor evaluation matrix, CPM, SPACE, and QSPM of shopee Indonesia. The International Journal of Business & Management, 7(4), 1–9. Web.
Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., Ojeda-Benitez, S., & Ramírez-Barreto, Ma. E. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management—A literature review on emerging economies. Sustainability, 12(17), 1–27. MDPI. Web.
Schroeder, E. (2021). Kellogg facing “big challenges” as strike talks continue. Baking Business. Web.
Seneca Foods. (n.d.). Seneca Foods – Farm Fresh Goodness Made Great. Web.
Shanmugalingam, P., Shanmuganeshan, A., Manorajan, A., Kugathasan, M., & Pathirana, G. Y. (2023). Does e-commerce really matter on international trade of Asian countries: Evidence from panel data. Plos One, 18(4), 1–16. Web.
Shiraz, Z. (2023). Food trends for better health in the remaining months of 2023. Hindustan Times. Web.
Loading...
