“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al. Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The main purpose of the article by DeMatthews, Carey, Olivarez, and Saeedi was to explore how racial perceptions impact the enactment of disciplinary measures in school contexts. The authors began by stating that Black students have a higher likelihood of facing a suspension than White students. In that way, it is important to focus on the actions of school authorities, such as the principals as the major disciplinary agents, and their perspectives on students’ race in connection with their behaviors. The authors added that negative school outcomes created by these power dynamics could produce adverse social outcomes and that is why this research is important. DeMatthews et al. noted that Black students often face punishments that are too harsh for the kind of misconduct they showed. This phenomenon can be interpreted as the abuse of power and excessive reactiveness of the authorities to the actions of a specific social group. The authors discussed the concept of institutional racism as based on a notion coming from biases practiced on multiple levels and resulting in the “adultification” of Black students and their perception as flawed beyond repair. Over the course of the study, DeMatthews et al. found that the principals responsible for the enactment of disciplinary measures tend to base their decisions on personal ideas, as well as the attitudes dominant in their communities and regions and practiced by other related agencies such as district policy-makers, schools, and administrations. The personal beliefs of the principals can be different depending on their individual backgrounds and mindsets. The latter are formed by a variety of internal and external factors and thus make the agents confident about their actions and visions.

Reference

DeMatthews, Carey, Olivarez, and Saeedi (2017). Guilty as Charged? Principals’ Perspectives on Disciplinary Practices and the Racial Discipline Gap. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 53(4) 519–555.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, December 6). “Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al. https://ivypanda.com/essays/guilty-as-charged-article-by-dematthews-et-al/

Work Cited

"“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al." IvyPanda, 6 Dec. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/guilty-as-charged-article-by-dematthews-et-al/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) '“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al'. 6 December.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al." December 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/guilty-as-charged-article-by-dematthews-et-al/.

1. IvyPanda. "“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al." December 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/guilty-as-charged-article-by-dematthews-et-al/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "“Guilty as Charged?” Article by DeMatthews et al." December 6, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/guilty-as-charged-article-by-dematthews-et-al/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1