Introduction
Healthcare is an important aspect of human activity, as well as an integral part of progress. Health outcomes and their distribution within a population are influenced by policies and interventions which become possible due to population health and clinical studies developing them and healthcare administrators applying them. The work of these specialists is as important as ever, yet they must change their practice because of growing disparity of healthcare access, while simultaneously requiring evaluating the potential influence and spending on new healthcare methods and interventions.
Trends Observed and Trends that Should Be Considered
Currently population health outcomes and healthcare service delivery are not in a general crisis. The minor changes of the number of chronic health conditions can be attributed to fluctuating economic development (Hill & Sevak, 2021). However, the trends demonstrate that health disparities among socioeconomic groups grow (Montez et al., 2021). The healthcare system cannot solve the problem because of its social nature, while healthcare providers are often unaware of public health researchers (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2022). Thus, the main problem of population health outcomes is the growing social inequality gap.
The researchers’ complications include finding the balance and cooperation between their respective interventions, while concerning the price and functionality of innovations. Overall, there is a growing need for interdisciplinary research employing methods such as case studies (Montez et al., 2021). An example of such research is an identification of superutilizers of health care by population health researchers and applying interventions developed by clinical research to keep them healthier.
Healthcare administrators must focus on the commercial, political-economic, and legal determinants of health. Promoting exercise and diet could reduce health inequalities if applied with an understanding of the core reasons behind the differential of access (Chin-yee et al., 2018). Healthcare administrators must consider not only the impact that new technologies will have on the overall population’s health, but the potential effects on health inequalities and vulnerable populations as well.
Conclusion
Thus, both scientists and administrators need to change their methods. The reason for this is the inequality of access to medical services. To deal with this problem, it is important to better understand the cost of care and the impact of innovations, to conduct interdisciplinary research, as in the case of superutilizers, as well as promoting exercise and paying attention on the influence of new medical on social problems.
References
Chin-yee, B., Subramanian, S., Verma, A. A., Laupacis, A., & Razak, F. (2018). Emerging trends in clinical research with implications for population health and health policy.The Milbank Quarterly, 96(2), 369–401.
Hill, A., & Sevak, P. (2021). Trends in medical conditions and functioning in the U.S. population, 1997–2017. Disability and Health Journal, 14(2), 101024.
Montez, J. K., Hayward, M. D., & Zajacova, A. (2021). Trends in U.S. population health: the central role of policies, politics, and profits.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 62(3), 286–301.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Population health science in the United States: Trends, evidence, and implications for policy: Proceedings of a joint symposium. National Academies Press.