Crowley, R., Daniel, H., Cooney, T. G., Engel, L. S., & Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. (2020). Envisioning a better U.S. health care system for all: Coverage and cost of care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(2), S7–S32. Web.
The article features information on the current situation in the American healthcare system. The authors claim that U.S. healthcare coverage is difficult for many individuals to access; it must be more affordable and efficient. The United States is the only country with a high income that does not have universal medical coverage. It emphasizes the existing problem in public healthcare in the U.S.
The source develops the topic of healthcare economic issues that are also discussed in other articles. The text by Crowley et al. (2020) adds detailed information about healthcare and health insurance costs. It allows the elaboration of the theme using factual details to support the central claims.
Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020). Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA. Lancet (London, England), 395(10223), 524–533. Web.
The article focuses on optimizing expenditures on public healthcare services, which is a critical aspect of economics in healthcare. Galvani et al. (2020) write that the national healthcare budget may be cut by 13%, more than $450 billion annually, if a single-payer, universal healthcare system is developed. In other words, there is an opportunity to change the existing healthcare expenditures by implementing new approaches.
The information from this text adds statistical details that correlate with the information from other sources. The authors also develop the discussed topic, articulating the opportunities for future improvements. In addition, the articles expand the topic of economics in healthcare, which justifies using the numerical data from this source in the paper.
Pliskin, N. H. (2018). The economics of healthcare shape the practice of neuropsychology in the era of integrated healthcare. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 33(3), 260–262. Web.
The article focuses on neuropsychology, an essential part of healthcare services. The emphasis on the particular sphere allows the authors to discuss it thoroughly and in detail, which creates a better understanding of the issue. The researchers claim that Medicare has problems covering neuropsychology expenses, a significant public healthcare issue (Pliskin, 2018). These medical services are unacceptable for most people in the United States, negatively affecting their well-being.
This source adds specific details to the general discussion provided by other articles that do not articulate the particular sphere of interest. Therefore, it can enhance the argument and provide the readers with the critical details that illustrate the general statements.
Ruggles, B. M., Xiong, A., & Kyle, B. (2019). Healthcare coverage in the U.S. and Japan: A comparison. Nursing, 49(4), 56–60. Web.
The authors provide comparative information on healthcare coverage in Japan and the United States. According to Ruggles et al. (2019), the American public health system has significant drawbacks that should be eliminated. The Japanese approach to public health, in turn, is considered to be optimal. Their approach to healthcare economics supposes that all citizens are guaranteed equal medical assistance and supervision, which is significantly different from the United States.
The authors emphasize that the high medical insurance costs in the U.S. make healthcare accessible only to privileged populations. It leads to decreased national health and aggravates the situation with chronic and incurable illnesses (Ruggles et al., 2019). As a result, American healthcare is experiencing specific problems with the number of patients who require help.
In addition, the Japanese healthcare system actively promotes wellness among citizens. It makes the information about preserving health understandable for everyone (Ruggles et al., 2019). It allows the assumption that using these ideas in American healthcare might improve its quality significantly.
The article provides a different perspective on American healthcare coverage, which adds details to the discussion. At the same time, the information from the research is relevant and supports the topic by emphasizing the existing challenges in American public health. Moreover, the authors propose a solution to the existing problems that can be implemented in subsequent research.