The article “Care Coordination Accountability Measures for Primary Care Practice” by Kathryn M. McDonald, Ellen Schultz, Noelle Pineda, Julia Leonhart, Tamara Chapman, and Sheryl Davies presents a well-weighted argument on the importance of healthcare coordination as one of the main principles of improving health care delivery in the United States. The article discusses the results of research studies conducted by a variety of specialists in the area of public health service including medical doctors, academic specialists, and theorists. The results of these research studies prove that healthcare coordination is an essential part of developing preventive strategies in public health service and guarantying patient satisfaction.
The authors of the article discuss a number of practical measures which may be undertaken in order to guarantee high-quality healthcare coordination in the United States. They state that such measures can be efficiently implemented only in the case research studies in the area will be conducted on a regular basis, high levels of accountability by healthcare specialists will exist, and constant measures directed to improving healthcare quality will be arranged. In addition, in the article, an important innovation of the Care Coordination Measures Atlas is addressed along with the explanation of practical ways of using it by healthcare specialists.
In conclusion, it should be stated that the article “Care Coordination Accountability Measures for Primary Care Practice” by Kathryn M. McDonald, Ellen Schultz, Noelle Pineda, JuliaLeonhartt, Tamara Chapman, and Sheryl Davies presents a well-thought-of argument on the importance of healthcare coordination for guarantying high-quality medical service for American citizens. The findings of the article’s research offer reliable facts supporting the value of effective management in American medical establishments.
The article “Patient Self-Management Support Programs” by Marjorie L. Pearson, Soeren Mattke, Rebecca Shaw, Susan Ridgely, and Shelley H. Wiseman addresses practical measures which can be undertaken by patients to improve their health. Placing the foundation of such conclusion on the results of numerous research studies in this area, the authors explain that no other participants of the healthcare process may contribute to improving patients’ health, but for patients themselves. Such a strategy is especially applicable in the case of chronically ill patients such as patients with diabetes, heart disease, stroke, etc.
In their article, the authors present a “self-management” plan developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. They show the effectiveness of this plan for patients with chronic diseases. To support their findings concerning the plan, the researchers provide opinions by independent specialists such as policymakers, insurers, providers, and employers. In addition, the economic benefits of implementing self-management plans by chronically-ill patients are shown in the article along with particular eviden from financial reports of public healthcare in the United States beginning from 2003.
All in all, the article “Patient Self-Management Support Programs” by Marjorie L. Pearson, Soeren Mattke, Rebecca Shaw, Susan Ridgely, and Shelley H. Wiseman can be evaluated as a reliable piece of information on the importance of patients’ role in improving their own health, and especially the role of patients with chronicle diseases. To assist such patients, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed the so-called “self-management” plan. The essence of this plan is in suggesting each particular patient an efficient strategy of self-health care applicable in his or her case.