Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

Hiring the right people to work with is often a challenging task. For varying reasons, employers prefer certain candidates over others. Generally, choosing to work with people who are similar to us has a good side as well as a bad side. This paper compares the effect of hiring a likable fool and that of hiring a competent jerk. To a large extent, managers hire individuals based on their level of competence or how likable they are.

Fool versus Jerk: Who would you hire?

While some people prefer working with individuals with a likable personality, others would rather work with knowledgeable and experienced workers, whether or not they are lovable. Arguably, some managers would not care about individuals who are great performers if such individuals are not pleased to work with (Casciaro & Lobo, 2005).

While it is generally difficult to choose between competence and likability, I agree with the authors of the article that working with individuals who are lovable has greater benefits for any organization. A critical look at the article clearly shows that solid relations at the workplace can easily be formed when management focuses on employing individuals with a pleasant personality. Without a doubt, such employees are able to work very closely with one another to ensure the realization of organizational objectives. In addition, they can collaborate quite well on joint tasks (Casciaro & Lobo, 2005). Arguably, most managers will choose not to work with a competent jerk despite the fact that such a person may be an excellent performer.

By and large, organizations rely on teams to be able to deliver effectively on work tasks. In order to create great teams in the workplace, it is important to have an environment where great relationships may be built and strengthened. The creation and development of such teams is, however, a big challenge if individuals can not socialize well. Undoubtedly, hiring likable individuals simplifies the process of creating teams that can facilitate the achievement of organizational goals. Working with individuals who are similar in the way that they look at issues also improves the decision-making process in organizations. While reaching an agreement in a diverse environment has its challenges, decision making is fast and easy, where employees are similar in their approach to issues.

According to Casciaro and Lobo (2005), an organization will prefer a competent jerk over a likable fool for various reasons. While a fool might not be very knowledgeable, it is apparently easier to get information from him or her than getting it from a competent jerk. Typically, competent jerks might know so much, but what is known to them may not be passed to any other person in the organization because of their personality. On the contrary, a fool may be happy to share with fellow employees what is known to him or her without any reservations. There are, however, drawbacks associated with hiring likable individuals. First, the overall quality of work may decline due to a lack of seriousness. There is a possibility that managers who hire people who are similar to them create a room for laxity. As a consequence, individuals may end up having so much fun and forgetting to work as expected.

Conclusion

Based on the arguments presented in the article and as explained in this paper, I would personally prefer hiring a lovable fool instead of a competent jerk. Hiring a likable fool makes it possible for an organization to create high-performance teams and simplify the decision-making process. Furthermore, ideas can be shared among colleagues very easily.

Reference

Casciaro, T. & Lobo, M. S. (2005). Fool vs. Jerk: Whom Would You Hire? Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, May 25). Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiring-employees-fool-versus-jerk/

Work Cited

"Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk." IvyPanda, 25 May 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/hiring-employees-fool-versus-jerk/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk'. 25 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk." May 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiring-employees-fool-versus-jerk/.

1. IvyPanda. "Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk." May 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiring-employees-fool-versus-jerk/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Hiring Employees: Fool versus Jerk." May 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiring-employees-fool-versus-jerk/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1