Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

The debate about the feasibility of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is controversial to this day. Bombing advocates tend to explain their position by arguing that the use of atomic weapons prevented the continuation of World War II and direct incursions, in which, according to statistics, many more people would die (Selden & Selden, 2015). In addition, the refusal of Japanese troops to surrender and Japan’s “all-out war” have also been put forward as arguments in favor of the bombing that stopped the atrocities of the “all-out war” of Japanese soldiers in China and ended the war in general. However, in my opinion, the use of such weapons, even in such conditions, does not justify the United States for several reasons.

First, the use of atomic weapons fundamentally carries with it at the moment the highest degree of barbarism and the grave consequences of its use. The cost of human lives determines the immorality of this weapon and the severe illnesses of the survivors, the high level of radiation at the site of the bombings, and, accordingly, the inability to use this territory for life or anything else. Second, the military necessity of using atomic weapons has not been proven. There is a point of view that Japan’s surrender would be inevitable very shortly. No wonder further agreements of many countries prohibited nuclear weapons since this is a hazardous type of weapon. Many famous personalities interpreted these bombings as crimes against humanity, state terrorism, or war crimes. Even though these episodes made it possible to end the Second World War, they led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people, including peaceful, unprotected, and uninterested in the war. Any opportunity to decide the outcome of the war in a more relaxed way, the existence of even a slight chance of reducing the number of victims ultimately outweighs the balance in the direction of the action’s illegality. No amount of military action can justify the use of atomic weapons.

Reference

Selden, K. I., & Selden, M. (2015). The Atomic Bomb: Voices from Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Voices from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Routledge.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, October 23). Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-bombing/

Work Cited

"Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing." IvyPanda, 23 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-bombing/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing'. 23 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing." October 23, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-bombing/.

1. IvyPanda. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing." October 23, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-bombing/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing." October 23, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-bombing/.

Powered by CiteTotal, online reference maker
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1