Holacracy: The Future of Organizing? Annotated Bibliography

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

This article written by two respected scholars of management investigates the field of human resource management international digest. The main idea represented in this work is based on the new model’s proposition in the workplace that suits the majority of generation Y representatives. The existing system of the hierarchical structure by which organizations are currently managed should be further transformed to holacracy. This term is considered in the article as a self-managing company system that allows the distribution of responsibilities among the equally managed groups of individuals. Therefore, the authority and decision-making process is derived by self-managing teams in the organizational structure.

Compared to the traditional hierarchically based system, holacracy depends on the isolated groups of employees who have different roles and functions, including the members’ leadership responsibilities. The authors argue that people in this system have an equally spread sense of risk-taking, independence, creative thinking, and involvement in the business process. For instance, the case of Zappos company examined in the research paper shows that halocracy, combined with the rewarding system, encouraged employees to contribute cultural values and treat their new group-based system as a self-handled small enterprise.

Referring to the Zappos company’s analysis, there are three key issues outlined by the authors. First, there is always a conflict between old and new generations, which is becoming more prominent with the implementation of innovations. Therefore, the interests of both sides should be considered. Second, there is no specific moment to integrate new ideas since it is better to initiate the changes in the company directly. Third, according to Pierce and Arguinis, a company should control the “too-much-of-good-things” effect to avoid chaos in the workplace in the future (as cited in Kumar & Mukherjee, 2018, p. 14). Finally, the structural changes alone are insufficient and should come in combination with the strong values and policies of an organization.

Reference

Kumar S, V., & Mukherjee, S. (2018). Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(7), 12–15. Web.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, August 13). Holacracy: The Future of Organizing? https://ivypanda.com/essays/holacracy-the-future-of-organizing/

Work Cited

"Holacracy: The Future of Organizing?" IvyPanda, 13 Aug. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/holacracy-the-future-of-organizing/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Holacracy: The Future of Organizing'. 13 August.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Holacracy: The Future of Organizing?" August 13, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/holacracy-the-future-of-organizing/.

1. IvyPanda. "Holacracy: The Future of Organizing?" August 13, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/holacracy-the-future-of-organizing/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Holacracy: The Future of Organizing?" August 13, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/holacracy-the-future-of-organizing/.

Powered by CiteTotal, easy citation maker
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1