“Homo Religiosus” of Karen Armstrong Review Essay (Article)

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Written by Human No AI

In the present day, people’s attitude to religion may be regarded as highly controversial. In her work, Karen Armstrong examines the modern concept of God introducing the term Homo Religiosus. Similar to Homo Erectus who had unique peculiarities in comparison with its ancestors, Homo Religiosus develop its own perception of religion. In the modern global society, religion still plays a significant role in human life, however, it is strongly connected with culture, social development, and creativity rather than limitations and taboos.

In the 1960s, despite the fact that young Americans stopped visiting church, they practiced oriental meditative techniques as they invariably demanded the spiritual way of life (Armstrong 3). The rise of the fundamentalism at the end of the 1970s demonstrated people’s desire “to see religion more clearly reflected in public life” (Armstrong 4). However, this movement is not conservative and orthodox; fundamentalists believe that modernized economies of developed countries promote the conditions of equity and justice valued by religion more effectively than partially modernized societies (Armstrong 6). Terrorist acts that are supposed to be determined by religious aspects practically have political underlying reasons. In turn, even science and logic are inseparable from aesthetic vision, intuition, and faith (Armstrong 14). Moreover, rejected by atheists, the religion practiced on a daily basis developed altruism and “elevated human life to the realm of holiness and gave practitioners intimations of transcendence” (Armstrong 13).

From a personal perspective, from the author’s arguments, readers should understand that religion is a significant part of human history and it has a considerable impact on every person’s life at all events. At the same time, people’s attitude to religion, God, dogmas, and tradition is subsequently developing, and religion may be served as a source of knowledge, creativity, and psychological help. That is why the position of radical atheism cannot be regarded as indisputably reasonable.

Work Cited

Armstrong, Karen. “The Case for God; Homo Religiosus.” 2009. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, February 22). "Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review. https://ivypanda.com/essays/homo-religiosus-of-karen-armstrong-review/

Work Cited

""Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review." IvyPanda, 22 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/homo-religiosus-of-karen-armstrong-review/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) '"Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review'. 22 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. ""Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review." February 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/homo-religiosus-of-karen-armstrong-review/.

1. IvyPanda. ""Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review." February 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/homo-religiosus-of-karen-armstrong-review/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. ""Homo Religiosus" of Karen Armstrong Review." February 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/homo-religiosus-of-karen-armstrong-review/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, you can request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1