The framers of the US Constitution designed the Senate as the body that confirms presidential appointments. At the same time, the Senate consents to ratified treaties involved in foreign trade. In this capacity, this institution prevents the president from making hasty decisions regarding appointing cabinet leaders or the vice president (Ketcham, 2019).
Besides, the Senate filters the output of international treaties. Recently, the Senate has approved and confirmed presidential nominations of leaders to serve in the Justice Department. Moreover, the Senate approved the international law proposed by the president to regulate substances that deplete the ozone layer. Given the aforementioned events, I would say that implementing the designed senate was a wise idea. Since most of the functions and actions in the Representative House are done abruptly and quickly, the Senate helps to reduce these issues. Choosing the appropriate outputs can help apply good strategies that are more cooperative with the organization. The idea mitigates a hard time the speaker experiences when planning for conference meetings as the plan helps alert the committee members of the date of possession of the law.
The American Senate is wise because it allows room for background research on the president’s nominated contenders for different positions. Such checks and vetting ensure that the contender is up for the task and eliminate possible fallbacks like corruption in the assigned governmental department. Reviews of international treaties are also connected to prior events. For instance, regulating substances that deplete the ozone layer is adopted from the Kigali Amendment Montreal protocol (Ketcham, 2019). This ensures that the treaty decision is not hasty and that its outcomes can be predetermined or projected before approval.
Reference
Ketcham, C. (2019). The beleaguered filibuster of the US Senate. Controversies in the Contemporary World, 15, 201. Web.