Introduction
Everyone has the right to live in a safe environment that promotes well-being, dignity, health, and happiness. General environmental obligation entails that a person must not engage in actions likely to cause environmental damage. Everyone must thus maintain, promote, and safeguard the environment from degradation. Environmental protection contributes to economic and social growth for the benefit of current and future generations. This indicates that environmental preservation should take precedence over the extraction of natural resources. Given the widespread occurrence of environmental catastrophes, shared responsibility for protecting the ecosystem is required to avert the growing threat of global warming.
Human-Environment Interactions
Humans have a moral responsibility to protect the environment from pollution. To prevent environmental pollution, each person must do their part to reduce, reuse, and limit consumption. In addition, humans must understand how interconnected air, water, and land resources are to develop effective conservation strategies. People should be accountable for mitigating environmental risks, including minimizing and controlling pollutants before entering the sewage system, the chimney, and the landfill. Specifically, preventing the release of air pollutants is a technical problem. Many methods exist to reduce pollution at its source and remove it from the environment. A good example is the use of fuel with no lead components, which permits the installation of catalytic converters on car emission lines (Kritsanaviparkporn et al. 633). Many of the contaminants emitted into the air by automobiles may be significantly reduced with these technologies. Another solution is the adoption of cars that use less fuel as well as electric vehicles. These cars may lower urban fuel usage by more than half if many people embrace them.
Secondly, industries are responsible for environmental maintenance and compliance with all environmental requirements. This includes construction workers and employees of the biotechnology and manufacturing industries. The industrial sector processes chemical wastes, which are then released into the environment. Dissipate chemical contamination of streams may be reduced by reducing or eliminating the chemical used in industries, agriculture, and the home (Akhtar and Palagiano 33). Individuals operating in these fields are accountable for managing wastes released into the environment by applying protective measures. Another possible action is to use compounds that can be processed without being discharged into the ecosystem. Since these businesses are aware of environmental issues, they can educate their consumers about how to use their goods in a way that does not harm the environment.
From a biblical perspective, human beings were given the moral duty to take care of all creations. In other words, humans should protect both living and non-living organisms in the environment. Oliphant et al. (6023) argue that people should sacrifice egoism and other self-interests and instead focus on protecting the environment. There are many ways of fulfilling this obligation, for instance, by teaching people about the benefits of preserving the ecosystem through agroforestry, which would prevent soil degradation and conserve water catchment zones. Likewise, people can be reminded that nature is God’s creation, and everyone must be responsible for it.
Undoubtedly, humans are responsible for transforming their thinking and values regarding the environment. Research suggests that altruistic and biospheric values influence all climate change responses (Marshall et al. 938). People variably respond to global change based on their behaviors and beliefs. A recent poll revealed that, relative to other European countries, Americans are less worried about climate change. For example, 90 percent of Greeks are highly concerned about climate change, and only 59 percent of Americans are seriously concerned (Fagan and Huang). Such attitudes are a drawback to the fight against environmental pollution. Climate change is a human-caused phenomenon, and behavior change is the responsibility needed for ecological preservation. With little or no self-efficacy, individuals may refrain from pursuing a specific behavioral change since they lack confidence in their ability to apply it successfully (Heald 4). To stimulate pro-conservation change in behavior, a crucial component of any solution must be the development of self-efficacy values so that individuals feel motivated and energized to pursue a strategic action plan.
In order to minimize the carbon imprint that cars leave behind, companies should urge their staff to take public transportation where possible. Alternative environmentally friendly ways of transportation include cycling and walking. In addition, the newest carpooling idea is a brilliant strategy to curtail carbon pollution (Molina et al. 9587). Individuals may share an automobile with their coworkers rather than traveling using separate cars, particularly those hailing from the same destination. This will enhance parking spots in workplaces while conserving the environment. Additionally, carpooling lessens traffic and demonstrates a corporation’s dedication to ecological sustainability.
Furthermore, whistleblowing should be encouraged as a method of reporting reckless environmental degradation, mainly deforestation. Reducing and preventing deforestation is everyone’s duty and may lead to environmental protection and climate change. Everyone must identify and report environmental crimes to eliminate pervasive impunity. Like all other informants, global warming whistleblowers know about a crime that the public is unaware of and share this knowledge to correct the violation. Correcting misbehavior in the context of environmental pollution whistleblowers may entail minimizing risks to the economy and international economic sustainability presented by ecological hazards and preventing more public health and environmental harm (Spellman 16). Greenwashing occurs when organizations misrepresent the ecological sustainability of their good and services or operational processes, which is a developing subject that whistleblowers may conceivably expose.
More importantly, governments must lead the fight for environmental conservation by implementing binding policies. They must safeguard citizens from the harmful environment by pushing for an ecosystem that is conducive to every person. For instance, governments must establish regulations and standards that protect citizens from pollution (Atalla). Such regulations can entail a ban on illegal logging, declaration of unique habitats as protected zones, and swift prosecution and punishment of those involved in environmental pollution. Similarly, governments must preserve vital habitats such as mangroves and rainforests that capture a substantial amount of greenhouse gases to combat global warming.
A wide variety of intervention strategies and financial mechanisms are available to governments to assist in the transition of the energy and manufacturing sectors, increase energy conservation, combat pollution, and safeguard and restore natural resources. Some are embracing a reward and punishment strategy, including green levies on adverse ecological practices, stringent laws, new sustainability legislation and accreditation for fuel efficiency, toxins, and contaminants, and tax breaks for fulfilling these criteria (Atalla). Other possible options include loans and subsidies for green initiatives in organic farming, alternative or low-carbon energy sources, and many more. Tax subsidy breaks are supplementary methods for increasing the consumption of sustainable goods and services such as electric vehicles, solar cells, and green technology (Atalla). Governments are additionally providing financial assistance and grant money to research organizations, educational establishments, and commercial R&D enterprises to encourage innovation and the development of revolutionary products such as sustainable power and carbon sequestration.
Finally, humans can fulfill their environment conservation duty by recycling waste products. Recycling lowers the demand for new raw materials to be grown, harvested, or extracted from the environment (Vezzoli 33). This, in effect, reduces the disturbance and harm inflicted on the natural environment. In short, fewer trees are destroyed, no waterways are redirected, no wild creatures are injured or relocated, and air, soil, and water pollution are reduced. Producing goods from repurposed materials consumes less power than producing goods from new resources. For example, creating new aluminum from existing objects consumes 95% less fuel than manufacturing it afresh (Spellman 21). Plastic reprocessing reduces the production of new plastic, which is a positive thing, given that polycarbonate is often generated from fossil-based compounds. Likewise, recycling metals minimizes the need for hazardous, costly, and environmentally destructive extraction and exploitation of more metals and minerals. Finally, glass recycling decreases the requirement for additional resources such as sand.
Conclusion
In conclusion, humans and the environment have a reciprocal connection. Humans are morally obligated to care for the environment to enjoy advantages such as a pollution-free atmosphere. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage better human-environment interactions worldwide to maintain each individual’s environmental obligations. In addition, governments should consider raising awareness and educating the public about the advantages of their ecological responsibilities. Finally, even though environmental protection and pollution control are the responsibilities of governments, all levels of government and citizens must provide technical, financial, and leadership assistance to set nature conservation and pollution prevention policies.
Works Cited
Akhtar, Rais, and Cosimo Palagiano. Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Impact on Human Health in Developed and Developing Countries, Springer Cham, 2018.
Atalla, George, et al. “Six Ways That Governments Can Drive the Green Transition.”Ey.com, EY, Web.
Fagan, Moira, and Christine Huang. “A Look at How People Around the World View Climate Change.”Pew Research Center, Web.
Heald, Seth. “Climate Silence, Moral Disengagement, and Self-Efficacy: How Albert Bandura’s Theories Inform Our Climate-Change Predicament.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol. 59, no. 6, 2017, pp. 4-15.
Kritsanaviparkporn, Emmy, et al. “Catalytic Converters for Vehicle Exhaust: Fundamental Aspects and Technology Overview for Newcomers to the Field.” Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 2, 2021, pp. 630-646.
Marshall, Nadine Anne, et al. “Our Environmental Value Orientations Influence How We Respond To Climate Change.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019, pp. 938.
Molina, José Alberto, J. Ignacio Giménez-Nadal, and Jorge Velilla. “Sustainable Commuting: Results From A Social Approach And International Evidence On Carpooling.” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, 2020, pp. 9587.
Oliphant, Zachary, et al. “Social preferences and environmental behavior: A comparison of self-reported and observed behaviors.” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, 2020. pp. 6023.
Spellman, Frank R. The science of environmental pollution. Crc Press, 2021.
Vezzoli, Carlo. Designing Sustainable Energy for All: Sustainable Product-Service System Design Applied to Distributed Renewable Energy, Springer Cham, 2018.