The decision to adhere to the ideas of flexibility while following the changes in the scientific community regarding the safety of patients in terms of the procedure of catheter insertion seems beneficial for the facility. Clearly, this solution corresponds to the essential needs of the affected persons in eliminating the risks of transmitting urinary tract infections. The significance of this aspect for clinical practice in the hospital setting is conditional upon the support of complex preventive measures that are believed to be effective for addressing the task (McNeill, 2017). Therefore, the emergence of new data regarding the appropriate techniques should be timely monitored and introduced.
In addition, the adoption of the Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change appears to be suitable for the mentioned goals as it would allow distributing responsibilities among nurses and achieve positive results. Meanwhile, in this situation, it is also required to pay attention to the possible drawbacks of its implementation in the workplace. Thus, according to Speroni et al. (2020), modifications in regular operations are possible in the case when strong leaders guide the process and educate nurses. These findings can be relied on when developing a global shift in aseptic techniques for their greater efficiency.
References
McNeill, L. (2017). Back to basics: How evidence-based nursing practice can prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urologic Nursing, 37(4), 204-207. Web.
Speroni, K. G., McLaughlin, M. K., & Friesen, M. A. (2020). Use of evidence‐based practice models and research findings in Magnet-designated hospitals across the United States: National survey results. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17(2), 98-107. Web.