A synthesis table is an effective tool that might help to structure research on a particular issue and answer the formulated questions. It helps to analyze existing pieces of evidence and research, organize them, structure them, and understand the further directions for the research. My PICOT question is
In black patients with type 2 DM (P) does electronic health record (EHR) alerts based on treatment goals and guidelines (I) compared to no alerts (C) achieve controlled hgbA1c levels (O) within 6 months? (T)
For this reason, the most important columns are design, sample, outcomes, and the level of evidence. Information in them is critical for answering the question and supporting them with the data that might help to acquire an enhanced understanding of the issue under research.
Moreover, by analyzing the synthesis table, it is possible to admit several variables linked to the selected PICOT. First of all, the sample is vital for the research as the participants’ selection logic implies finding individuals 65 years or over. Moreover, criteria are also crucial as it is necessary to focus on clients with diabetes. Moreover, the outcome criteria are also essential as it promotes a better understanding of the issue under research and shows the results of recent and current studies on the topic. In such a way, these variables are vital regarding the PICOT question and discussion of the topic.
Finally, answering the PICOT question, it is vital to focus on design and outcome. The correct organization of the study helps to ensure that all necessary variables and elements are considered. It will guarantee that there will be no ethical issues or other factors affecting the credibility of the research. At the same time, the outcomes are critical as answering the research question, the results will help to compare the effectiveness of various interventions and make a conclusion. In such a way, a synthesis table is an effective tool vital for practice improvement projects.