Introverts are quiet observers who fully comprehend but seldom feel understood. This social group is the subject of numerous misunderstandings and stereotypes. According to author Jonathan Rauch’s argument in his article Caring for Your Introvert: The Habits and Needs of a Little-Misunderstood Group, a lot of the stereotypes about introverts are because others do not know how to treat them correctly. This also can happen because many people do not respect how they choose to depict their life. The author’s resolve to examine the distinctions between introverts and extroverts using actual instances is his strategy for influencing others’ perceptions of introverts so that they are more understanding and encouraging. The author puts emphasis on how it is important for the audience to comprehend that introverts are not always what people assume they are (Rauch). The article’s tone and style, which attempts to build a dialogue with its audience rather than present dry academic information, add another layer to Rauch’s key purpose. The author’s explanation of why he did not want to be perceived as impolite because he suffered from uncomfortable, talkative interactions with an extrovert was his main argument.
A closer analysis of the author’s claims, as well as the content and tone of the article, makes it easier to delve into the issue and reconsider one’s initial stance. This is done through the appealing language of the article and the ease of reading. Moreover, in contrast to common preconceptions and clichés, the author sees himself as an introvert with strong social skills who values in-depth talks that disclose innermost feelings and who likes them (Rauch). The way in which extroverts use these traits to rule social interactions, while introverts remain stay on the other end of the range, would be a recurring key point that would describe an extensive detailed comparison. Because introverts have historically been seen as insensitive, closed-minded people, the author hopes that others would allow themselves to be more understanding of them and supportive of their decision (Rauch). The structure of the reading is appealing to the reader because it is divided into clear structure parts, which still serve one purpose. The author’s claims and his chosen narrative framework, thus, emphasis his openness to dialogue and wish to educate the people.
Within these settings, the article seems to reach its goals and meet the author’s expectations. Jonathan Rauch engages his audience by drawing on their unique perspectives and experiences. He frequently uses humour in his writing but strives to maintain a tone positive in his descriptions to make them easier to read and keep his audience interested. He tries to make people aware that introverts should be treated with greater respect and not with unfair judgments. The author attempts to take a fresh look at how society regards and behaves towards introverts by describing some contrasts between introverts and extroverts. The fact that Rauch characterizes himself as a prototypical introvert is one of the strongest arguments in favour of this assertion. Understanding that introversion is an orientation rather than a choice or way of life can help the listener comprehend this remark. The author’s effort to connect with his audience on a human level shows how determined he is to do so. Therefore, this article can be an example of a successful narrative paired with a well-established question and argument.
Works Cited
Rauch, Jonathan. “Caring for your introvert.” The Atlantic. Web.