Philosophers and academics have been interested in the quest for happiness for generations. In the article, James Anderson debates whether achieving happiness is a destination or a journey. He examines whether happiness is a means to a goal or an end in and of itself. According to the article, happiness is a process that calls for the endeavor and active participation rather than a static condition. Although he makes a strong case for the existence of happiness, the foundation and organization of his article are less strong, which eventually lessens the general effect of his argument.
The article does a good job of presenting the controversy over whether success begins with happiness or ends with it, but it stops short of taking a firm position. The paper investigates the connection between happiness and professional success. According to Anderson, genuine happiness is not just a passing feeling but the outcome of a purposeful and happy existence. He examines the connection between pleasure and significance and implores readers to consider what truly makes them happy. Although Anderson makes a strong case, he encounters several obstacles in getting his point across to the audience. For instance, more proof or examples from real-world situations could have improved Anderson’s point. The supporting data indicated that the author successfully claimed that choosing a profession should not be contrived solely by happiness but rather by the advantages of doing something beneficial. This argument was made more relatable to the reader by using personal anecdotes and examples by the author. This message effectively impacts readers because it discredits the conventional wisdom that having a well-paying job makes them happy and challenges readers to reassess what is vital in their careers. The article may persuade readers to pursue professional fulfillment rather than merely concentrating on financial gain. Despite these obstacles, Anderson’s piece makes a compelling case for happiness and its significance in people’s lives, emphasizing on optimism.
James Anderson bases his case on the principles of optimistic psychology. Anderson contends that prosperity does not precede happiness; rather, the reverse is true. To bolster his claim, the author provides a quote from Achor’s writing, “happiness and optimism actually fuel performance and achievement—giving us the competitive edge that I call the Happiness Advantage” (Anderson). His use of such research studies offers convincing proof to support his claim about positive psychology’s core principles. By doing so, the author strengthens his case by appealing to the reader’s logic and emotions at the same time. It is, therefore, more probable that they will pay attention to and contemplate the author’s message in their own lives, given that they relate to the message being conveyed in the article.
The article’s organization and execution are necessary for its success, and the author’s aptitude for information conveying plays a significant role in creating a coherent and captivating work. Although the author’s thesis is compelling and well-supported, the article’s organization could be strengthened. The introduction receives extreme attention from the author, leaving little room for further investigation and discussion. The first three lines of the article are spent by the author examining the idea of happiness without offering any in-depth analysis or connections to the main point. Following the author’s major points is tough because of the article’s lack of focus in the opening paragraphs. While the author’s thesis is sound, the article’s structure must improve its significance. A strong argument requires the author to convey information effectively. The introduction’s lack of coherence undermines the author’s case. The introduction by the author lacks focus, which relates to how crucial it is for the rest of the piece to have a clear and concise structure. This concept is related to the discussion of the author’s capacity to persuade the reader of the validity of the thesis through satisfactory supporting proof despite having a rather less organized piece.
While Anderson successfully reached his goal of offering a nuanced viewpoint on happiness and its connection to goals, he was less successful in clearly conveying his point of view due to the work’s muddled organization and the absence of several specific examples. He presents different arguments and research studies that back them up throughout the article. For instance, he talks about how pursuing dreams can make people happy but also stresses the importance of relishing the journey and finding happiness in the present. The article’s lack of an explicit argumentative structure prevents it from fully achieving its goals. The piece endeavored to synthesize different viewpoints on the subject, but it could not. The article also relied on anecdotal examples rather than concrete proof to support its claims. Its main effect is to get readers to reflect more thoroughly on their connection with happiness and how it pertains to their objectives, as this brings contentment to working environments.
In conclusion, this article emphasizes the importance of finding fulfillment at work. The author makes a strong argument for the value of happiness by showing how it can result in more efficiency, innovation, and job fulfillment. The article’s general message is impactful and clear, though there were some places where it could have been more effective. Let people remember that their happiness is a crucial component of their success and general well-being as they navigate their jobs.
Work Cited
Anderson, Jamie. “Is Happiness the Beginning or the End?” (2014).