Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor Essay (Article Review)

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Environmental and economic problems, associated with the rapid growth of the world’s population, scholars and thinkers are considering the possible models which allow eliminating the crisis at least partially. Garrett Hardin in her article entitled “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” presents a scholarly approach to the existing state-of-art in international relations and the ways the support of the poor countries enables the misuse of limited resources. The author argues that wealthier states should not provide financial and food aid to poor countries, neither should they let in huge numbers of immigrants from the developing world, as it will result in planet overpopulation and exhaustion of the main resources.

The author successfully defines most concepts and ideas she puts forth. First of all, the main idea of the lifeboat is explained at the very beginning of the paper: there is a limited number of people a boat can take aboard, so if viewing the situation from the Christian perspective and saving everyone, the rescuers are likely to swamp along with the rescued. Similarly, helping poor nations automatically means multiplying their populations, which will need increasingly more aid and make extensive use of exhaustible resources. The concept of the tragedy of commons is also described clearly, so one can understand from the article that if everyone has unlimited access to a certain resource, the common possession will soon disappear due to its misuse. The Chinese fish metaphor is also elucidated and effectively put into context: it is much more helpful to teach a person or a whole nation to provide for themselves instead of turning them into dependents. However, the spaceship argument the scholar seeks to repudiate is not defined clearly, so the reader can only suppose what the spaceship model is.

Although the author in general builds her argument logically and makes each link explicit, there are several unstated points the author probably believes are common knowledge. First of all, the author doesn’t note the threat of global warming as a serious environmental issue, close-knit with human economic activity. Because the human population is growing, economic activity is intensifying for the purpose of meeting the needs of this huge global community. At the same time, with the expansion of economic activity, air pollution becomes more evident, so the author relies on this fact stating that resources are vanishing quicker with population boosting. As it has been proven above, this assumption is logical and true.

However, there is one substantial fallacy in reasoning. The author implies that developing nations will remain dependent on the wealthy world for centuries and fail to learn to build their infrastructure from the inside. Therefore, the author underestimates the object of her criticism and approaches it as unable to gain new skills at the national level. In addition, the author is not fully objective, as she fails to provide the positive progress developing states are making in terms of self-regulation. For instance, in African countries and India, birth control campaigns have thirty-forty-year history, so it is important to understand that they are not mere consumers of the West’s food, but also independent and “intelligent” structures which are able to fix their internal problems with the support of the “civilized ” world.

It also needs to be noted that the author approaches immigration in a biased way and reduces it to mere recruiting of cheap workforce from poor countries. In fact, the issue is much more complex in the context of developed countries like the United States, which have to put so many resources in people arriving in the country, in order to ensure they adapt in the proper way and become true members of the wealthy nation, not the poor community. For the first years after moving abroad, such people really do non-qualified work, but the fact of their immigration proves that they seek success and finally obtain it by gaining additional education and making a career. Therefore, the evidence about immigration is not actually true.

Works cited

Hardin, G. “”. 1974. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, October 4). Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor. https://ivypanda.com/essays/lifeboat-ethics-article-by-garrett-hardin/

Work Cited

"Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor." IvyPanda, 4 Oct. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/lifeboat-ethics-article-by-garrett-hardin/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor'. 4 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor." October 4, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/lifeboat-ethics-article-by-garrett-hardin/.

1. IvyPanda. "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor." October 4, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/lifeboat-ethics-article-by-garrett-hardin/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor." October 4, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/lifeboat-ethics-article-by-garrett-hardin/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1