Introduction
One of the most challenging problems companies face is staff resistance to change. Resistance may include a constant decline in output, an increased number of resignations and demand for transfer, chronic disputes, slowdown or wildcat, and sullen hostility. Changes are inevitable and productivity-oriented, whether in daily office processes, machine locations, or personnel job titles and assignments (Warrick, 2022).
However, this reluctance often arises due to ignorance and an unnecessary attitude. Dealing with resistance requires everyone’s participation and understanding of the actual cause of resistance. Thus, it can be said that opposition frequently results from employee blind spots. Management and executive staff can also be aligned to deal with staff attitudes. Another way to deal with resistance is effective communication among stakeholders.
Stakeholder Groups
A shareholder has a consigned interest in a corporation and can either influence or be influenced by a business’s operations. An investor is one of the shareholders whose role is to fund and run the organization. Some employees provide labor for production in various departments. They are essential in any firm’s production process.
Suppliers also play an essential role in supplying a company’s merchandise. However, a firm cannot run without clients who create demand for production (Lewis, 2019). Another essential stakeholder in the organization is the local community. They provide market, labor, and even raw products. The government also plays an indispensable role by passing policies and laws. Government decisions and policies have a great impact on the success and expansion of any firm.
Reason for Resistance
The biggest reason staff resist change is a lack of knowledge about the reason and intent for the alteration. This resistance arises when organizations fail to communicate the details and input of employees in the realization of the change. Employees may exhibit explicit resistance when there is a change in their role (Warrick, 2022). When responsibility shifts, more workers often lack the urge to learn a new technology or system.
Some workers may also oppose change if the communication department does not formally inform them. Staff who are not involved in decisions to transform and the structure of solutions may also defy such adjustments. Additionally, if the corporation’s top managers display a negative attitude towards change, it will have a direct impact on the workforce’s support and behavior for the alteration.
Resistance by Different Groups
Investors and Clients
Change in a company may have dire consequences, such as reduced stockholder value. The worth of an organization and its stocks is based on the net current value of all imminent cash flows. Therefore, alterations in discount rate and cash flow can decrease shareholders’ value. Investors may develop concerns about accountability if organizations expand or adopt large-scale production in terms of management.
Another reason for resistance among investors is the possibility of financial loss. Defaults and alterations in the corporate interest rate can pose a significant monetary risk. On the other hand, transformations in a Company also affect clients (Brandes & Lai, 2022). For instance, clients may fear alterations in the quality of products and services with increased concerns of price increases.
Suppliers
Changes in a company also significantly affect its suppliers, whether positively or negatively. For instance, in the ABC organization, suppliers in cosmetics, electronics, pharmaceuticals, paints, and chemicals will greatly feel the impact. Merchants may be reluctant to change due to concerns about fresh contract applications, doubts about the future of production and trade, possible extra costs involved in supplies, and stiff competition from other well-established dealers (Oreg & Berson, 2019).
With the potential enhancement of machinery and production, other products may also be introduced or dropped. It might also come with the loss of jobs from other dealers who opt to quit or are forced out of business.
Community and Government
Community refers to the local society within which a company is situated. Any decisions by the organization have a significant impact on the community. Their reluctance may result from fear of losing jobs due to the adoption of technology or a shift in the location of the organization. Moreover, transformations in a firm may also result in environmental impact if machinery is enhanced or the size of a company is reduced (Oreg & Berson, 2019). The government may also resist change in a company in terms of high taxes imposed on a firm or the passage of unfavorable policies that bar the adoption of some machinery or systems.
Stakeholders
In an organization where stakeholders resist change, they tend to avoid participation in the transformation or attempt to be excused from such plans. Shareholders may explicitly display negative feelings such as criticism, aggression, frustration, and low morale (Brandes & Lai, 2022). They may also avoid status conferences, skip planned training and project events, or neglect work altogether. Workers may also disregard new methods or technology adopted and seek shortcuts and workarounds.
Another sign of resistance is a decrease in productivity through a significant decline in outputs, delays, and missed deadlines. Due to this, stakeholders may also develop unending disputes among themselves. Resistance to change is, therefore, characterized by defiance of the firm’s set protocols.
Actions to Mitigate Resistance
Communication helps employees to understand the need for change, and it should come first. It will assist the workers in justifying the transformation earlier and help lead the change effectively. Furthermore, it is important to train them earlier on the new structure and responsibility before the change. Training allows workers to partake in change boldly since they have an understanding of their new role.
The staff should also be motivated to learn and adapt to the changes through incentives and rewards. The leadership of any organization should also be at the forefront of the adjustments and have a positive attitude toward them (Lewis, 2019). The management team should always begin by changing themselves and then influencing workers to follow. Additionally, all stakeholders should take part in making decisions about change and support each other’s judgments and input.
Other Actions
Perceptions of the negative effects of possible penalties also influence resistance to adjustments. Therefore, stakeholders should be assured by engaging in dialogue with them to reach an agreement. Another strategy is to co-opt shareholders who are most resilient to transformation into key roles in the execution of change initiatives. In this strategy, staff who are prone to reluctance to change will have the priority of leading change.
The organization should also provide concise guidance about the targets and goals it intends to achieve (Lewis, 2019). If a dispute arises, it should also be dealt with quickly and transparently. It should inspire stakeholders to be artistic, discover solutions to emerging challenges, and remain positive as part of the adjustment process.
Conclusion
Underestimating or underrating the reluctance to change is a common fault among various corporations aiming to transform their work operations. Resistance is worse and can be disastrous to the quality and quantity of production by any firm. Defiance to change may begin with the top stakeholders, investors, clients, workers, government, and local community. It comes in various forms, such as absenteeism, negative emotions, conflict, lack of participation, and low productivity. However, resistance may be due to fear of the outcome or inferior communication between stakeholders and the executive. Every firm should aim to address resistance challenges quickly and effectively through support, participation, communication, rewards, training, resolving conflicts, and even remaining positive.
References
#1 executive certification in change management leadership – empowering leaders. Aventis Learning Group. (2021). Web.
Brandes, B., & Lai, Y. L. (2022). Addressing resistance to change through a micro interpersonal lens: An investigation into the coaching process. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Web.
Lewis, L. (2019). Organizational change. In A. M. Nicotera (Ed.), Origins and traditions of organizational communication (pp. 406-423). Routledge. Web.
Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2019). Leaders’ impact on organizational change: Bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 272-307. Web.
Tafelsky, T. (2021).7 strategies for overcoming resistance to change in an organization. Blueprint RF. Web.
Warrick, D. D. (2022). Revisiting resistance to change and how to manage it: What has been learned and what organizations need to do. Business Horizons. Web.