Introduction
In the way of regarding situations of America’s battle on drugs, marijuana is one of the main enemies. Subsequently, alcohol and tobacco, two dangerous substances, are legal which raises the question of why marijuana is against the law.
The truth that marijuana is illegal and prohibited is suitably caused by the number of funds invested in the war against drugs. However, the government cannot retrace her course at the moment.
However, to provide evidence for this cause, the disparity connecting illegal and legal materials (more so alcohol and marijuana) must be gotten rid of.
Some of the ill consequences are direct and some change the manner of acting and motor acquired ability of the drinker, helping them perform duties they would not frequently do. Consequently, the main consequences come as a result of heavy drinkings, like “a mental state characterized by a pessimistic sense of meagreness and a despondent lack of activity is commonly diagnosed in alcoholics” (Rittenhouse 140).
Marijuana, in as much as it is declared illegal, is a little out of place. The source earlier cited noted that “Even though it is classified as a schedule drug for authoritarian reasons, it is obviously different with regard to pharmacology from the narcotic anodynes” (Rittenhouse 151). Recently an intense debate arose on the medicinal worth of marijuana. Whether there is a distinct use for marijuana is uncertain, but there is indisputably no such debate about alcohol.
Consequently, the financial plan does not make divisions between combating marijuana and combating cocaine and heroin. This clearly shows that marijuana covers five percent of the financial plan of drug prevention allocations. This is far much below the actual percentage.
In the war on drugs, the act of investment that the government is aware of is its arrogance. A combined attempt to inform the American public that Marijuana is not good for the taxpayers was made by the government.
Moreover, it would be an absurd circumstance for the government to believe or accept without questioning or challenging its pride if marijuana was to be legalized.
It is not merely the sum of money committed to ensuring observance of or obedience to anti-marijuana laws or the jobs that add up on marijuana being legal. Moreover, the conceit with which the American government acquires in combating the hypothetic immoralities of marijuana. Nevertheless, the government, as the major financier, is to a certain extent in an exceptional position. They possess almost total rule over the resolution of the legalization. It is not logical for the government to push away so many people and so much money, except when they had to politically.
The war on drugs was carried on by the government for the reason that the existing circumstances with marijuana appear to be outstandingly marked by correspondence or resemblance to that of the Vietnam War. Due to the government’s overconfident position against communism, Vietnam was made longer spatially for many more years than it had to be. An explanation of the menace of a likely nuclear war, writers George Kahin and John Lewis observed that “Kennedy fully understood or grasped the treacherous possible integral in any step by step increase especially to counteract competition or aggression of violence whereby a nation’s goals are progressively widened as it becomes more dedicated to a constructive outcome” (Kahin 181). The government’s “allegiance” for a drug-free America, nonetheless, has nothing comparable to the risk of nuclear war to stop the increasing Drug War.
In Vietnam, for the government to pull out of their investment, a radical societal group had to come in. This also was seen in the issue with the war on drugs. No matter how imperfectly it is running or how lavish it is for taxpayers, the government is not one to get rid of away its investments on its own. Despite all these, the government maintains the enormous investment that they have in combating the use of marijuana.
Works Cited
Kahin, George McTernan, and John W. Lewis. The United States in Vietnam. The Dial Press, New York: 1967.
Rittenhouse, Joan Dunne, ed. Consequences of Alcohol and Marijuana Use. National Institute on Drug Abuse; Rockville Maryland: 1979.