In his article, “Mentoring Benefits Student and Teacher,” Engle (2019) does not explicitly state a research question, but the study analyzes what role mentors have for new staff members and the whole organization. Thus, the author’s thesis is that “mentors may prevent errors that can have long-lasting effects” (Engle, 2019, p. 20). The scholar tries to prove his statement by offering arguments that mentors help individuals avoid mistakes and develop career plans. Furthermore, Engle (2019) states that mentorship is essential for businesses since “mentors also provide subjects with important information about the enterprise, organization, industry, and competition” (p. 20). However, it is worth mentioning that the author does not address the opposing viewpoint in his study. As for implications, the article shows that every organization should invest in developing mentorship since this phenomenon “rewards both the mentor and new staff member with valuable insights and skills” (Engle, 2019, p. 20). Thus, there is a positive connection between mentorship and business performance.
Simultaneously, it is necessary to present a critique of the given article. Firstly, even though the research question addresses an essential topic of the business world, it is generalized, which may deteriorate the article’s quality. Secondly, a significant claim refers to the research methods that were used. The author did not describe a methodology that allowed him to collect the data, making it challenging to comment on the study’s validity and reliability. Thirdly, this information indicates that the study’s conclusions also witness some criticism. It is so because the scientist does not support his claims with statistical data or trusted references. That is why it is possible to conclude that further research is required to identify how mentorship can influence businesses.
Reference
Engle, P. (2019). Mentoring benefits student and teacher. ISE: Industrial & Systems Engineering at Work, 51(3), 20.