Introduction
One of the essential assets of the discussion is the idea that the object of sociological analysis is big and complex. The scope of the investigated problem means there is a chance to use multiple tools or methods to investigate it.
Discussion
Every selected research tool might be considered scientific as it helps to collect information about one of the objects of interest and conclude about its relevance, importance, and role it plays in a particular process from the sociological perspective. Applying different frameworks, it is possible to find explanations for a broad set of phenomena and acquire their enhanced understanding.
However, it might also be viewed as a disadvantage that should be considered when conducting a study. The availability of multiple tools for investigation might be confusing for a researcher as there is a need to select the best possible ones. Moreover, it is vital to guarantee the credibility of findings and ensure the acquired results possess practical utility and might help to expand the existing body of knowledge. For this reason, the complexity of the object of sociological research can be viewed both as an advantage and disadvantage. A researcher is free to select from a variety of tools; however, it is vital to ensure the validity and relevance of the chosen research paradigm. Otherwise, there is a high risk of acquiring false data and failure.
Conclusion
These takeaways seem essential as they are fundamental for the whole discipline and the further ability to conduct research and collect the necessary information. It is also critical to keep in mind the fact that regardless of the scientific nature of every method, some of them might not apply to a particular case, and other tools should be selected.