Introduction
The margin for error is minimal in the aviation industry. Human error may have various adverse effects, from minor delays to severe accidents. Addressing human error is crucial as the aviation sector expands, not just for passenger safety but also for the standing and viability of aviation organizations. This paper explores the effects of human error on employees and the larger company while proposing a multifaceted method to mitigate it.
Comprehensive Training and Simulation Programs
Any plan for reducing errors must start with thorough training. Employees should go through rigorous training that mimics real-life events, whether they are pilots, air traffic controllers, or maintenance staff (Cusick et al., 2017). There may be a solid and demanding Direct Effect on Employees. They require that staff members stay current on the newest procedures, tools, and situations. This can need longer training sessions and repeated exams to verify mastery. On the plus side, knowledgeable workers are more specific in their positions. They are adept at handling crises, which promotes work satisfaction and a safer flying environment.
Implementing Advanced Technology and Automation
While relying only on automation is not the answer, employing technology to support and supplement human tasks may be highly beneficial. For instance, advanced warning systems in airplanes can notify pilots of possible problems before they become life-threatening (Koomen et al., 2021). New technology frequently has a learning curve when it is introduced. Employees need to become accustomed to new systems, which may take some time at first. These technologies may eventually facilitate and improve staff productivity. For the company, this translates into fewer mistakes, improved safety, and possibly considerable cost savings in terms of upkeep and fuel economy.
Encouraging a Transparent Reporting Culture
The underreporting of errors out of fear of retaliation is one of the difficulties in dealing with human error. Aviation companies should promote a culture where staff members may disclose mistakes or near-misses without worrying about facing repercussions (Duryan et al., 2020). Although it promotes openness, some workers can view reporting mistakes as a sign of ineptitude or weakness. Trust is developed over time when the company uses these reports to reward rather than punish. Employees have a sense of worth and belonging to a more significant effort to improve safety. Understanding where mistakes typically happen inside the company can result in targeted training and structural changes.
Regular Health and Psychological Assessments
Employees’ physical and emotional health is essential, especially for pilots and air traffic controllers. Employee fitness for duty can be ensured by routine health examinations, which may include psychological tests (Fox et al., 2018). Required health checks may be viewed as intrusive or a sign of distrust. Some could claim that it violates their right to privacy. These examinations can catch any health problems early for the employee, improving long-term personal health. It guarantees that all employees are functioning at their best for the company, lowering the possibility of mistakes brought on by health-related problems.
Conclusion
Although some employees may find the suggested tactics complicated or invasive, the main objectives are efficiency and safety. Achieving corporate goals while guaranteeing the competence and well-being of personnel is a tricky balance. Erring on the side of caution is desirable and even necessary in a field where the stakes are incredibly high. Despite its difficulties, the road toward achieving the synergy between employee well-being and organizational performance is worthwhile for the benefit of all parties concerned.
References
Duryan, M., Smyth, H., Roberts, A., Rowlinson, S., & Sherratt, F. (2020). Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: Cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 139. Web.
Fox, M. A., Spicer, K., Chosewood, L. C., Susi, P., Johns, D. O., & Dotson, G. S. (2018). Implications of applying cumulative risk assessment to the workplace. Environment International, 115, 230–238. Web.
Koomen, E., Webster, C., Konrad, D., Van Der Hoeven, J. G., Best, T., Kesecioglu, J., Gommers, D., De Vries, W. B., & Kappen, T. H. (2021). Reducing medical device alarms by an order of magnitude: A human factors approach. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 49(1), 52–61. Web.
Cusick, S. K., Cortes, A. I., & Rodrigues, C. C. (2017). Commercial Aviation Safety (6th ed.). McGraw Hill Professional.
Loading...
