Music and consumption significantly influence an individual’s psychological well-being on account of distinctive elements. My main idea involves exploring the dynamic variables steering the consumption essence of music, that is, cognitive perception and human behavioral response system. In this case, I assess studies conducted by Lijtmaer (2020), Mastnak et al. (2020), and Campesato (2019). One of the researchers, Lijtmaer (2020), argues that music is necessary for patients due to the optimal positive effect on the recovery process. The researcher depicts that as a formative clinical case, a patient’s psychological and mental cold and distant shows improvement after listening to music. In this case, music emerges as a trigger to the cognizance of an individual’s environment and social identity. I seek to prove the interdependence between music psychology, consumption, and the relative response among personnel based on personalities and social identity. Music psychology fosters the proficient assessment of its impact on the mental and psychoanalytic essence as a mediatory element to people’s healthcare.
My interest in exploring music psychology enshrines deriving crucial details on the variant consequential outcomes from the interaction of people with music. One of the vital frameworks to investigate involves the impact of music on healthcare among patients. A different aspect of the study enshrines investigating the relationship between music and culture. The deconstruction of distinctive elements of music and consumption steers the proficient justification of the interdependent relationship between music and people’s well-being. I have chosen the topical outlier on music and consumption to understand the divergent ways music influences human health status through cognitive and behavioral responses. Music is a major construct in my society and contributes to cultural identity mainly through traditional dances and lyrical forms. An indepth investigation into the variants of music consumption attributes to the perceptive outlier concerning the potential transformative consequence.
Different scholars significantly contributed to the topical issue of music and consumption and relativity to cognitive constructs. One of the key researchers on music and consumption is Beer and Greitemeyer (2019), whose major contribution involved the effect of music on customers in a restaurant. In this case, Beer and Greitemeyer (2019) agree that music attributed to an increase in tipping behavior from the clients on account of a positive and competent service experience. Ideally, music consumption significantly influences the purchasing behavioral quotient among consumers in a restaurant, hence the inclusion of the study in the critical analysis.
There is a significant interdependent relationship between music consumption and the productivity levels of the brain and cognition. Terry et al. (2020) cited at least 158 times, is one of the key researchers on the vital topical framework. The scholars focus on the impact of music consumption in sports and exercise thus conducting a multilevel meta-analysis of at least 139 previous study contexts (Terry et al., 2020). In this case, the researchers establish that music consumption profoundly influences physiological, psychological, performance, and psychophysical quotients during physical activities (Terry et al., 2020). Ideally, the study profoundly supports my appeal regarding the dynamic effect of music consumption to individuals’ well-being through a positive cognitive and mental conditioning.
As a multifaceted phenomenon, music consumption profoundly steers a change in the cognition and experiential aspect among audiences. De Witte et al. (2020) is another key researcher in music consumption and the effect to human body. Cited at least 231 times, De Witte (2020) conducts a multilevel meta-analysis affirming the possibility of listening to music in reducing stress-level among individuals. The researchers investigate the psychological and physiological stress experiences based on key variants, mainly heart rates, levels of hormones, nervousness, and anxiety (De Witte et al., 2020). The scholars conclude that music consumption significantly contributes to the reduction of stress due to the transformative aspect on cognitive behavioral response (De Witte et al., 2020). Fundamentally, the study aptly supports my inquiry on music consumption as a necessity within medical care practice to improve patients’ recovery process.
Rationale
Different scholars utilize distinctive perspectives and approaches to derive crucial information on music consumption. Mastnak et al. (2020) focus on assessing music consumption as a therapeutic remedy among breast cancer patients. The researchers present their study based on the necessity of improving medical care among sick personnel suffering from anxiety and depression. In this case, Mastnak et al. (2020) present the rationale based on previous studies’ evaluation and comparison to the primary data collected. Primarily, there is proficient effectiveness among the Chinese in alleviating depression and anxiety. However, Mastnak et al. (2020) summarize that music consumption efficiency depends on the profound essence of tailoring the context based on the patient’s personality and socio-cultural features. I noticed significant similarities in the assessment of music consumption’s impact on individuals’ healthcare. The core strength of the study involves conciseness in addressing two major emotional conditions, anxiety, and depression. Despite the optimal efficiency, the major bias from the literature context enshrines the adept attention amongst breast cancer patients. The gap fosters the foundational paradox concerning the relevance of the findings and applicability among patients suffering from various illnesses.
In a divergent appeal, music consumption renders a monumental effect on cognitive abilities among personnel. Lijtmaer (2020) presents the rationale based on personal experience and professional observation. As a medical practitioner, Lijtmaer (2020) encounters the hurdle of emotionally and psychologically connecting with a patient. However, the researcher played music and noticed a distinctive change in the behavioral response from the patient. Although the client showed cold and distant reception, the music consumption factor attributed to the psychic change. As a result, the patient proficiently expressed his feelings and memories associated with the music played, indicating a necessity to alter the treatment course. Lijtmaer (2020) concludes that the magical effect of music positively affects an individual’s cognitive behavioral therapy. The study’s major strength involves the intersection of observation and experiential quotients as the primary data sources to demonstrate the transformative effect of music consumption. However, I noticed the biased overview through the concentration on a single patient’s cognitive behavioral response. The disparate approach in evaluating music psychology attributes the major difference from other studies by establishing music consumption as a trigger to psychological and mental recovery.
Different contextual outlooks on music psychology feature an in-depth comprehension concerning the perceptive and transformative effects. Campesato (2019) postulates that one of the musical transgressions involves the classification of noise. On the one hand, music offers optimal therapeutic essence to the audience, mainly patients. On the other hand, irrelevant contextual music risks misconception and distractions among people hence categorizing the music as noise. In this case, the researcher offers an in-depth insight into the influence of music on socio-cultural constructs among personnel (Campesato, 2019). Over the decades, music attributed to the emergence of distinctive social identities and a sociological environment. The study’s bias involves the focus on noise as the core element of musical transgressions. The researcher presents the findings and insights through the spectrum of interdependence between music consumption and cognition, rendering an optimal strength on the transformation of music in a cultural context (Campesato, 2019). Despite music being a repressive factor due to its categorization as noise, the change in perception to advance the influence along the constructive and therapeutic remedy domain demonstrates the study’s strength.
Methods
I discovered that the three studies demonstrate distinctive aspects of data collection methodologies hence the dynamism of contextual analysis. Mastnak et al. (2020) employed an experimentation initiative account of providing a clinically practicable and efficient music model on therapeutic essence. Lijtmaer (2020) conducted a psychological-based test by exposing the patient to music playing and observing the cognitive behavioral response. Both studies focus on the effect of music consumption on individuals’ healthcare. However, the core disparity between the two studies enshrines the analytical perspective. While Mastnak et al. (2020) use mixed method analysis, that is, quantitative and qualitative, Lijtmaer (2020) exploits the qualitative aspect to derive key results. In a different spectrum, Campesato (2019) utilizes divergent psychoanalytic theories, such as the Freudian framework, to investigate the role of noise in musical transformation and consumptive efficiency. The marginal difference between Campesato’s (2019) and Lijtmaer’s (2020), and Mastnak et al. (2020) entails the assessment of music consumption as a psychoanalytic quotient. The disparate approaches among the three studies attribute to an objective outlier regarding the intersectional value of the information.
Objectivity is an essential variable in healthcare on account of improving the reliability of the study findings. Mastnak’s et al. (2020) major goal involved deriving crucial details in utilizing in the medical field, akin to the intentions of Lijtmaer (2020). Both studies exploit the core foundation of experiential and observation as intersectional components during data collection. On the one hand, Mastnak et al. (2020) employ a non-randomized control group, while the key assessment entailed the measure of Chinese music therapy’s effectiveness in eradicating depression and anxiety among patients. On the other hand, Lijtmaer (2020) adapts the narrative context on account of personal and professional encounters. In this case, Lijtmaer (2020) subjectively interprets the psychic change of a single patient after exposure to music consumption. The two studies investigate the vital relationship between music consumption and its contribution to individuals’ healthcare status.
The evaluation of music consumption adeptly depends on individuals’ perception and responsiveness. Campesato (2019) compares and contrasts previous studies and mainly theoretical constructs to derive vital insight. The scholar’s crucial research question underpins the necessity of dissecting the contextual outlook on music transformation and its relativity to noise. While noise is a repressive and suppressed factor, it is a phenomenon that proves the aesthetic value of music. In this case, Campesato (2019) exploits the literature review as the analytical approach to amplify the objective state of the derived details. However, Mastnak et al. (2020) and Lijtmaer (2020) employ qualitative and quantitative analysis to ensure the reliability and validity of the primary data gathered. The three studies significantly contribute to the investigation of music consumption and its effect on cognitive behavioral response and healthcare. However, the contrast lies in the exploitation of subjective and objective overviews to intensify the pool of information on the impact of music consumption. I appreciate the divergent approaches adopted by the researchers due to their proficiency in articulating critical insights. The constructive outliers attained include dynamics of culture, self-awareness, empowerment, obsessive-compulsive state, and emotional relief.
Findings
Music consumption is an initiative that optimally depends on the intersection of core values. The different studies demonstrate distinctive outlooks on the perception of music and cognitive behavioral responsiveness. While Mastnak et al. (2020) realize that music is the therapeutic remedy for breast cancer patients, Lijtmaer (2020) argues that it is a contextual outlook to psychoanalysis. It is the core responsibility of researchers and professionals to assess the interdependence between music consumption and well-being. On the one hand, the three studies demonstrate the proficient impact of music on individuals’ healthcare through psychological and mental responsiveness. Campesato (2019) notices that music is noise on account of the repressive nature of the audience. On the other hand, the music consumption approach influences the human behavioral quotient. Fundamentally, the findings justify a profound relationship between music psychology and human behavioral aspect through the cognitive domain.
There are significant similarities between the three studies based on the contextual analysis and comparative foundation of music consumption. Despite the challenging aspect of justifying the mediating variables, music plays a key role in the determination of human well-being on account of its influence on the brain and cognitive processing. Campesato (2019) dynamically assesses the impact of music and derives that it is subjective to individuals’ interests. Further, Mastnak et al. (2020) emphasize that it is critical for medical practitioners to demonstrate cultural competence due to the importance of musical context. The insufficiency of psychoanalysis among audiences risks ineffectiveness towards positive human behavioral responsiveness.
There is a significant interdependence between the cognitive psychological overview’s conscious and unconscious response systems. Consciousness impacts human behavior hence the importance of comprehending the impact of music consumption. According to research, cognition is an outcome of the cognitive unconscious (Mastnak et al., 2020). In this case, the cognitive unconscious entails an interplay of various mental processes without the person’s consciousness. Therefore, an individual could be afflicted with blindsight but optimally show positive willingness and stimuli to certain responses. Consciousness optimally contributes to the behavior based on short-term and long-term memory to demonstrate receptive behavior.
Music and consumption’s dynamic essence aptly influence individuals’ quality of living. Different research by Mastnak et al. (2020) demonstrates that listening to music is therapeutic, mainly among breast cancer patients. The authors indicate despite the high percentage of breast cancer patients, it is paramount to incorporate remedies to reduce the level of anxiety and depression. In this case, Mastnak et al. (2020) conducted the experiment in a Chinese hospital and noticed significant positive outcomes. Although breast cancer is one of the terminal illnesses, music therapy plays a crucial role in alleviating anxiety and depression among sick personnel. As an oncological foundation, music therapy renders an adept opportunity to elevate investigation regarding its influence on lively energy, self-regulation, self-esteem, musical self, and emotional relief.
The research findings foster an apt foundation for the exploration of music psychology, mainly consumptive essence. The different studies demonstrate the distinctive appropriation of dynamism concerning human behavioral response while indicating the importance of the approach. Music is a therapeutical element to patients on account of harmonizing the cognitive processing of events and memories. Therefore, interdependence underpins an affiliation to the psychological and mental condition concerning exposure to music.
Conclusion
There is a significant interdependence between music psychology, consumption, and individuals’ well-being. The different studies demonstrate distinctive insights regarding the elements affecting music consumption and responsiveness among people. In this case, there is an optimal comprehension that music enhances the positive effect on cognitive abilities and processing. It is crucial that further research assesses the consequential outlook on the association between music and social identity within communities.
The most memorable experience with hip-hop was listening to the song ‘Dear Mama’ by Tupac while I was in high school. It is a significant experience since it serves as a reminder of the hardships parents endure to raise their children and the appreciation they deserve regarding their sacrifice. Tupac was an American rapper using music to address the social issues the minority American societies were facing. In essence, the sociological perspective in rap music influences the followership in the hip-hop culture.
Hip hop has changed immensely across the decades mainly because of the intensified binding elements. In the 1970s, hip hop mainly entailed the rapping element without visuals in the cassettes, but the key message encompassed liberation. A good example is the song ‘Rock the Bells’ by LL Cool J. However, the style of hip-hop evolved in the 1990s with the incorporation of additional elements. These elements include break dancing, painting of graffiti as well as the deejay. A good example of such a song is ‘Rapper’s Delight’ by Sugarhill Gang. In the song, the artists rap while some dancers perform choreography, and the deejay concentrates on beats. Hip hop in the present demonstrates superiority and liberation, a sociological phenomenon that persists from previous decades. An excellent example of recent hip-hop music is ‘Freestyle’ by Jay Z. It is a song that focuses on appreciating the efforts of the minority and their struggles as the main goal of liberation and freedom.
Further studies are recommended to focus on the diversification of music consumption effects across the healthcare sector. Mastnak et al. (2020) and Lijtmaer (2020) focus on breast cancer and psychologically ill patients, respectively. In this case, the outliers render the optimal gap concerning addressing the mental well-being among individuals suffering from divergent illnesses. An excellent example is analyzing the effect of music consumption on people suffering from dementia. The initiative attributes to the proficient adjustment of the music consumptive quotient.
It is recommended that further research contributes to the derivation of coherent theoretical constructs indicating the vital composites of music for the targeted audience. Campesato (2019) establishes a profound gap based on the essence of psychoanalysis. One of the important medical values to improve the quality of care entails the incorporation of the metaparadigm of nursing. Fundamentally, the contextual outlook addresses the distinctive elements of psychoanalysis between patients and practitioners. Identifying the components affecting the psychoanalysis process and practice attributes to the comprehension of music psychology.
Further studies are recommended to assess the interdependent relationship between cognitive behavioral therapy and music consumption. Mastnak et al. (2020) articulate that Chinese music therapy fosters positive outcomes, mainly alleviating depression and anxiety among breast cancer patients. Lijtmaer (2020) justifies music consumption as a therapeutic model for psychologically ill personnel, while Campesato (2019) indicates a proficient psychoanalysis effect. Fundamentally, it is paramount that scholars concentrate on key mediatory features steering the music consumptive transformation. A music consumptive therapeutic model renders an optimal solution to the improvement of individuals’ quality of living.
References
Beer, A., & Greitemeyer, T. (2019). The effects of background music on tipping behavior in a restaurant: A field study. Psychology of Music, 47(3), 444-450. Web.
Campesato, L. (2019). The paradox of music transgressions: Noise as a libidinal energy. Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, 14(1), 103-114. Web.
De Witte, M., Spruit, A., van Hooren, S., Moonen, X., & Stams, G. J. (2020). Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: A systematic review and two meta-analyses. Health Psychology Review, 14(2), 294-324. Web.
Lijtmaer, R. (2020). Music beyond sounds and its magic in the clinical process. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80(4), 435-457. Web.
Mastnak, W., Wang, L., He, P., Fan, L., & Mao, Q. (2020). Chinese music therapy to alleviate anxiety and depressive traits in breast cancer patients. The Shanghai model. Journal of Clinical Research in Oncology, 3(1), 1-9. Web.
Terry, P. C., Karageorghis, C. I., Curran, M. L., Martin, O. V., & Parsons-Smith, R. L. (2020). Effects of music in exercise and sport: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 91. Web.