Introduction
There is a variety of ways one can obtain information while working on some research or even merely looking for some proof or evidence of an event or statement. Both non-peer-reviewed and peer-reviewed types of data are valuable. However, one should be aware of the situations in which each of these information types can be applied effectively. While both typically offer valid data, only peer-reviewed information can be used in research studies.
Discussion
Non-peer-reviewed information (expert opinion) is information provided by an expert in a field. The expert typically has extensive knowledge and experience in a specific area. Strengths of non-peer-reviewed information include the ability to provide concise, up-to-date information quickly and efficiently. Furthermore, the expert is often seen as a reliable source, providing credibility to the information. A weakness of non-peer-reviewed information is that it is not subject to rigorous peer review. As a result, the accuracy and reliability of the information are questionable. A situation in which non-peer-reviewed information would be used is when an individual is looking for current information on a topic. For example, a journalist may use an expert’s opinion to provide an in-depth analysis of a current event. Additionally, an individual may use an expert’s opinion as a source of information to help them make a decision.
In contrast, peer-reviewed research has been rigorously evaluated by other experts in the field. This method provides credibility to the findings as it has been evaluated by a panel of experts (Tariq et al., 2021). Strengths of peer-reviewed scientific research include objectivity, accuracy, and credibility. Furthermore, it is a reliable source of information as it has been evaluated by experts. A weakness of peer-reviewed scientific research is that it can be time-consuming and costly. A situation in which peer-reviewed scientific research would be used is when an individual is conducting a study or researching a specific topic. For example, a researcher may use peer-reviewed scientific research to provide evidence to support their findings. Additionally, a student may use peer-reviewed scientific research to support their thesis.
Conclusion
Overall, non-peer-reviewed information and peer-reviewed scientific research both provide reliable sources of information. Non-peer-reviewed information is useful when an individual is looking for concise, up-to-date information quickly. Conversely, peer-reviewed scientific research is a reliable source of information as it has been evaluated by experts. Both types of data are valuable in their corresponding dimensions and can be used by individuals depending on the aim of their data search.
Reference
Tariq, S., Hasan Masood, M., Nasir, M., Junaid, K., & Afzal, S. (2021). Infodemics: Use of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed information by post graduate trainee doctors for COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 27(2), 249-256. Web.