Mallet’s article Asynchronous Online Collaboration”
Do you think that you could succeed in an online math course?
The online math series offers alternative and versatile learning environments; therefore I have a chance of coping. However, since I am not a Native American, my responses to written and oral communication may be limited and consequently check my success. After such a course, I would be required to present some of the processes in the real world. The challenges experienced in an online means such as system-imposed alterations of the form of questions. As an external student, the online course would not give me the necessary knowledge experience acquired from debates and discussion.
Are there certain types of courses or material that you simply do not believe can be taught to a large population with large success?
A large population significantly translates to the presence of diversified culture. Language barriers and cultural beliefs are some of the associated limitations in a multicultural society. Their teaching and implementation of outlined practices may be challenging to such a community. Attaining these skills of communication is essential to translate some conceptions into practice. It would also be difficult to understand the problems of others.
Factors that Mallet used in measuring success
Success can be measured through tracking the progress of students in their course work, and how they would regard their colleagues at the work area to improve their competence. This, however, would need plenty of resources and time to settle on a comprehensive conclusion. There are other available methods of measuring success including student evaluation responses or assessment of their online partnership.
I agree with the illustrative system which enabled students to understand their errors, and also know how fellow students grasp instructions. The comprehensive method, conversely, brings some contention. I disagree with it in the way that students are allowed to make intentional mistakes, on the condition that they would be corrected and taught how to respond to the questions. Though it may be helpful in teamwork, it may not necessarily measure the success of the individual. The evaluation of the course by filling in documents always entails dishonesty, as students may give responses that suit the administration. The problems, solutions, and general trends method may also be lame, as in much as students may respond appropriately in writing, their oration may be insufficient. Furthermore, when analyzed orally they may not be able to respond as desired hence assumed not to be conversant to the topic.
Van House’s article “Weblogs: Credibility and Collaboration in an Online World”
Weblogs help in creating new conception channels in which individuals can receive responses from the other users. In collective work, credibility is a key essence of confidence. Bloggers expose, back, and modify assessing practices and thus demonstrate their strength within learning communities. The honesty and scope of their sources of information, and whether the data is inclusive, thorough, and impartial determine reliability. Assessing the integrity of a person is thus difficult, and people usually resort to identifying the order the blogger is allied to, whether they have an informal understanding of apposite performance or observations of their intellectual qualifications.
Blogs can be created by anyone within seconds, and Internet users, notwithstanding their experience or academic qualification, will post responses. I would advise scholars and researchers to avoid relying on such sources as their credibility is not confirmed. Any individual with an Internet connection will outlay their opinions, which may not have scientific or academic backing.
Do you think Van House did a sufficient job of describing how to measure the credibility of a blog?
The author did not appropriately address how to measure the integrity of a blog. The popularity of a site cannot be used to calculate its credibility; neither does the idea that unidentified writers do not provide valid information. An argument is offered to state that information on blogs may be more valuable than published works based on the claim that other learned scholars do not have the opportunity to publish their works. Trusting information just because the response comes from a person who has disclosed his details and credentials is dangerous.
Regardless of how you feel, what criteria would you use in examining the credibility of a blog, or for that matter, any online content?
The quality of information must be scrutinized instead of looking at the number of responses. Bloggers who leave links with desired outcomes can be judged as credible, as they provide the intellect to do further research on the topic. Accuracy is important and must be in a way that the presented data reveals the real world and events under consideration. Descriptions that represent reality, accompanied by relevant examples are good methods of examining the feasibility of any online content.
Fischer’s “Group Processes Online”
Do you think that the model presented in Fischer’s “Group Processes Online” followed a typical track?
The model intends to continue the collaborative possibilities for off-campus students, emphasizing more on process rather than quantity. The student’s experience in the group provides a basis for their assessment. Teamwork and collaboration of students and having students lead some of the activities are its other aspects. The model follows a normal track, even though it shows substantial changes in communication facets that affect faction interactions.
Would you change anything if you were in their place about what that they did in their work on moving to a collaborative environment or in addressing the challenges that they encountered?
Some essential changes can progress in the model. Early familiarization of prospective students with online courses is necessary to ensure that they do not experience any technological limitations. The responsibilities of teachers should be intensified so that they can create more space for online monitoring. Improving communication mediums and ensuring the students know how to utilize all the communication mediums is also required. Creating channels to know when group members are available, for example, through instant messaging, which enables students to determine the presence of members is invaluable. This will improve response time, improve interactivity, and hence better relationships between instructors and students.
References
(n.d.). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Web.
PremiumSale.com premium domains. (n.d.). PremiumSale.com Premium Domains. Web.
(n.d.). Test Page for the HTTP Server on Fedora. Web.