Updated:

Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Written by Human No AI

Introduction

Religion has a valuable place in many people’s lives, and many have at least once in their lives wondering about the evidence of the existence of a higher power. Many studies are being conducted on this topic, and convincing evidence is being provided. However, opposers of the existence of God use information obtained during archaeological examinations that prove the process of evolution. Ontology, cosmology, and theology are the closest approaches that affect this topic, where each has a unique view on justifying the existence of God.

Ontology

The first area of research that proves the existence of God is ontology. Anselm of Canterbury plays the central figure in this knowledge. The scientist wrote two fundamental works called “Monologion” and “Proslogion,” in each of which he presented his philosophy of religion (Jackson). The main argument of this approach is the concept that the existence of God is justified by the possibility of producing an “act of right thinking at the limit of human capabilities” (Sus para. 20).

Thus, the ontological proof is based on the fact that the Almighty is something more than a person can conceive and is an idea in mind. Because God exists ‘both in mind and reality’ and individuals cannot ‘imagine something greater than God’ (Sus para. 20). These circumstances lead to the conclusion that the Almighty exists.

Cosmology and Teleology

The cosmological point of view considers the existence of God as a cause. In other words, this approach reflects that everything that begins to exist has a cause. Hence, that cause must be God, who created different worlds, and nothing else could have the power to create the universe out of nothing. The third area with the most convincing argument for the existence of the Almighty is theology. This point of view implies the existence of order, purpose, and complexity in the natural world around people.

Like cosmology, theology emphasizes the presence of cause and the creator who shaped this world. Therefore, God is the great creator of the world’s order, purpose, and complexity. He created it so that creatures could safely exist and function in it, taking into account the most minor aspects.

Opposite Arguments

Despite these arguments, there are refutations that God exists. Thus, in various archaeological excavations, many proofs were found that the world was formed during evolution and was not created by the Almighty. Research states that “the theory is an idea about how something in nature works that has gone through rigorous testing through observations and experiments designed to prove the idea right or wrong” (Theory of Evolution para. 3). In other words, scientists, for example, point to the finding of prove fossil transitional forms between apes and humans. Thus, this indicates that people, like beings, were not designed by God but underwent a long and complex process of evolution, during which they acquired their characteristics and traits.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are three leading arguments to the question of the existence of God, which are provided by ontology, theology, and cosmology. Each approach justifies that the Almighty is the cause and creator of the world of people and animals. However, there are also refuting theories that prove the absence of God through evolution. Therefore, knowledge of these arguments will allow people to soberly and thoroughly evaluate the information about God so that each individual has their idea about this aspect.

Works Cited

Jackson, Guy. “.” World History Encyclopedia, Web.

Sus, Viktoriya. “The Collector, Web.

“Theory of Evolution.” National Geographic, Web.

Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2025, October 17). Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ontological-cosmological-and-theological-arguments-vs-evolutionary-refutations-on-gods-existence/

Work Cited

"Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence." IvyPanda, 17 Oct. 2025, ivypanda.com/essays/ontological-cosmological-and-theological-arguments-vs-evolutionary-refutations-on-gods-existence/.

References

IvyPanda. (2025) 'Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence'. 17 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2025. "Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence." October 17, 2025. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ontological-cosmological-and-theological-arguments-vs-evolutionary-refutations-on-gods-existence/.

1. IvyPanda. "Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence." October 17, 2025. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ontological-cosmological-and-theological-arguments-vs-evolutionary-refutations-on-gods-existence/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Ontological, Cosmological, and Theological Arguments vs. Evolutionary Refutations on God’s Existence." October 17, 2025. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ontological-cosmological-and-theological-arguments-vs-evolutionary-refutations-on-gods-existence/.

More Essays on Concepts of God
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, you can request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked, and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only qualified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for your assignment
1 / 1