Introduction
In healthcare, the rights of patients and related matters are of utmost importance to medical personnel. In any medical care situation, people have the right to self-determination and to set boundaries with their doctors. Thus, their rights are of paramount importance for all caregivers.
In this context, people with mental disorders have special needs and unique treatment needs. The legal protection of such patients is also essential to safeguard their opportunities, rights, and autonomy. The legal responsibilities of doctors and nurses, as well as the standards of physicians, are essential to consider to ensure that the care process is as thorough as possible.
Patient Rights and Legal Issues Concepts
Relationship of Self-Determination to Competence
Self-determination is a fundamental right that empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their care. At the same time, the doctor’s competence determines the degree of influence on the process of making care decisions (Husabø et al., 2023). This includes the patient’s ability to take note of information, process it, and make informed decisions based on causal relationships. Determining the ability of patients to give informed consent involves several steps:
- Assessing the patient’s ability to understand and retain information about their treatment;
- Assessing the patient’s understanding of the risks;
- Assessing the patient’s understanding of the consequences of decisions made;
- Obtaining the voluntary consent of the patient.
Competency
The Self-Determination Act governs the competence to consent to treatment. This definition means that the patient must be capable of understanding the possible consequences of the decision fully and either consent to or refuse it. The Self-Determination Act, also known as the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA), requires medical personnel to inform patients of their right to refuse or agree to treatment (Droz Mendelzweig, 2020). At the same time, the patient retains the right to create advance directives, such as writing a will or appointing a power of attorney.
Living Wills and Health Proxies
Living wills and health proxies are legal documents that must detail a patient’s wishes regarding end-of-life care and medical treatment. Living wills governa person’se legal treatment inthe event of incapacity (Tay et al., 2019). Such a document outlines the actions the legal authorities need to take, as well as who will serve as the person’s guardian and make legal and medical decisions on their behalf. In this case, health proxies are individuals appointed to act on behalf of a person with a disability in matters related to care decisions and medical treatment.
In psychiatric-mental health care, the concepts discussed provide a legitimate rationale for how clinicians should act and make decisions on behalf of a patient with a disability (Tay et al., 2019). This is particularly important in this area, as many patients may be incapacitated and may not fully understand the responsibilities that come with participating in the decision-making process.
Legal and Ethical Issues
The Tarasoff case obliges people to protect third parties who represent their clients’ interests. This is necessary when the mental health professional becomes aware that the patient may have or has caused significant harm to others. Thus, a legal basis for declassifying personal information arises, creating a dilemma. Authority and reporting are legal obligations for a mental health professional who has learned about potential harm to others (Guina et al., 2022). The difficulty is that, in the future, this could deter patients from seeking help.
Authority and Responsibilities
Internal rights protection systems are unique mechanisms applicable in medical institutions. Their primary function is to address patient problems and complaints arising from legal inconsistencies or issues during treatment (Yaacoub et al., 2020). Compliance with all rules, requirements, and standards for providing care and treating clients can be challenging in complex or controversial cases.
For example, the operation of such an internal system can be explained to a lawyer assigned to the patient, helping them understand the rules of care and contracts that must be followed in a medical institution. This is especially true for people who experience mental difficulties and cannot fully perceive information. Ombudsmen and ethics committees are also part of the internal system for protecting patients’ rights, as they must act to provide people with the most accessible treatment conditions.
The external protection system may include certain committees or organizations unrelated to the medical institution. They may be involved in working with patients and clinics to impartially determine the rights and obligations of clients and the medical institution in legally contentious matters. Patients with mental disorders may have difficulty asserting their rights, requiring the involvement of a third party to resolve any disputes between patients and the clinic (Yaacoub et al., 2020).
In this way, external rights systems act as advocates, negotiating on behalf of patients to achieve the most beneficial, ethically and legally correct outcome. An example of such a protection system is an organization that provides counseling and assistance to individuals with mental health issues. Specialists from such a company may have all the necessary powers to represent the client and defend their interests.
Differences Between the Statuses of Capacity
Unfit to Stand Trial
In the legal field, there are different concepts and categories of patients, depending on how they can defend their interests. Unfit to stand trial (UST) status refers to people who have been found mentally incapable of making informed decisions and of being aware of all the consequences (Brown, 2019). This type differs from others because UST focuses on the client’s mental state by examining their ability to understand and respond to the allegations.
An important aspect, in this case, is that this concept does not affect the patient’s mental state at the time of the crime. An example of well-known litigation would be the case of Jared Lee Loughner, who attempted to take the life of U.S. Representative Gabby Giffords, resulting in the death of six people (Berne, 2020). During the meeting, due to the defendant’s behavior, it was found that he was not suitable for judicial investigation, which is why he was sent to a psychiatric hospital for recovery. Thus, the UST status allowed the court to postpone the hearing until the defendant stabilizes.
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
The next category is Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI), which means a person cannot be held responsible for a serious crime due to a psychological disturbance at the time of the crime. This category significantly differs from the rest, as it refers to a specific time when the patient experiences mental state problems (Brown, 2019). During the commission of a crime, a person may be affected by a different mental state, which is why their actions do not constitute grounds for incurring criminal or administrative responsibility.
In this case, it can be said that the purpose of the NGRI is to alleviate the respondent’s psychological state by attempting to correct it in a specialized institution. Thus, a side effect of this decision may be the protection of public safety and law and order. An example of a case applying the status in question would be the case of John Hinckley Jr., who in 1981 attempted to assassinate United States President Ronald Reagan (Peterman, 2019). During the investigation, he was found unacceptable, leading to his being placed in a psychiatric hospital for treatment.
Guilty but Mentally Ill
Another parameter in investigating criminal and administrative offenses is the Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI) status. This characteristic is assigned to defendants who plead guilty to the crimes committed and the fact that they had a mental illness at the time of the crime (Brown, 2019). The difference between this parameter and the previous two is that the status of a mentally ill person does not exempt the patient from legal responsibility.
Thus, when sentencing, the court considers the suspect’s severe psychological state, which means that the punishment can be mitigated. Additionally, this means that, in conjunction with a criminal sentence, the defendant must undergo compulsory treatment in a psychiatric hospital. This allows the court to consider the case thoroughly, taking into account both the criminal and psychiatric aspects of what happened. An example of a GBMI recognition case is the investigation into the 2001 murder of Andrea Yates (Miceli, 2020). She was declared incapacitated and placed in a psychiatric institution to serve a criminal sentence and undergo treatment.
Legal Liability
Competent medical care is the responsibility of nurses, for which they are legally and ethically responsible. Legal liability may arise from violating any standard of work or from improper fulfillment of the necessary conditions of care (Liddell et al., 2020). This category, for example, includes negligence, which may manifest as a failure to pay adequate attention to the patient’s problem, resulting in the patient experiencing difficulties or worsening of their condition. To avoid potential legal liability, nurses must adhere to strict rules and procedures regarding standards of care, record-keeping, and informed consent when caring for patients who are unable to fully assert their rights.
HIPAA and Protection of Health Information
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal law designed to protect the security of care and the privacy and security of patient health information. This provision restricts the distribution and disclosure of patients’ personal information to help maintain their privacy (Theodos & Sittig, 2021). This act is closely related to protecting health information and the mandate to inform.
Privacy, security, and breach notification rules are the main points of the health information protection system. In this case, whistleblowing mandates are official exceptions to the standard rules that permit the disclosure of information when necessary. One of these cases is the authorities’ warning that the patient may pose a threat to others.
Schizophrenia Case Studies
Denial After Schizophrenia Diagnosis
Scenario
Mr. J., recently diagnosed with schizophrenia, insists his symptoms are merely stress and denies having a psychiatric condition. The nurse must assess insight, symptom severity, safety risks, treatment understanding, and support systems before he leaves, while therapeutically addressing his denial through supportive confrontation and education.
Analysis
Before Mr. J. leaves, the appointment will need to conduct a mental status examination with a thorough evaluation to understand the patient’s thought process. Additionally, it will be essential to collect a psychosocial history to understand the personal circumstances that may influence the patient’s unwillingness to accept the diagnosis (Emamikia et al., 2022). Researching coping mechanisms is also essential to find out what factors have a profound effect on the life of Mr. J. and what disorders he may face due to the diagnosis. To help the patient accept the diagnosis, it is essential to avoid directly challenging Mr. J. and maintain a tone of understanding and respect. The specialist should be encouraged to ask questions to provide the patient with more information about the diagnosed disorder.
Communicating with Negative Symptoms
Scenario
A patient with schizophrenia exhibits primarily negative symptoms, including limited verbal and emotional responsiveness. The nurse must adapt therapeutic communication, manage reduced engagement during teaching, and implement strategies to support cognitive deficits and enhance understanding.
Analysis
When dealing with a schizophrenic patient with negative symptoms, communication must be adapted to their impaired verbal response. To cope with reduced emotional and verbal responses, the nurse must give the person more time to process information, actively listen, and use nonverbal cues and positive reinforcement (Correll & Schooler, 2020). Thus, patient education can be more effective when information is delivered in a way that is accessible to the person. One can simplify the instructions, repeat what has been said, and create a structured daily routine to compensate for some cognitive deficits.
Weight Gain and Medication Adherence
Scenario
After one month on olanzapine, Ms. R. has gained significant weight and is considering stopping her medication. The nurse must develop a plan to address weight management concerns, promote adherence, and prevent relapse.
Analysis
Primarily, developing a plan for Ms. R. needs a comprehensive assessment of her health status, including laboratory tests, to determine the source of her weight gain. The next step is to have a conversation with the patient to explain the importance of taking the medication (Gomez et al., 2021). In this case, a doctor can start looking for alternative drugs to address the problem of weight gain. Another necessary aspect is to study the patient’s lifestyle to encourage more activity and prevent weight gain. It is also worth regularly monitoring progress and adapting the strategy if the desired changes have not been achieved.
Conclusion
Caring for patients with limited mental perception and those who cannot be fully responsible for their actions requires strict adherence to rules and the implementation of specific standards. They are essential not only to ensure the goal of improving clients’ condition but also to contact law enforcement if it is discovered that the patient may harm others. Ethical and legal issues are of great importance and must be considered when creating a comfortable and safe environment for clients.
References
Berne, E. C. (2020). 25 Women who Defied Limitations. Compass Point Books.
Brown, P. (2019). Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law, 59(3), 187-196.
Correll, C. U., & Schooler, N. R. (2020). Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a review and clinical guide for recognition, assessment, and treatment. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 519-534.
Droz Mendelzweig, M. (2020). Social regulation activities in end-of-life: a qualitative study on completion of advance directives in Swiss nursing homes. BMC Palliative Care, 19(1), 1-11.
Emamikia, S., Gentline, C., Enman, Y., & Parodis, I. (2022). How can we enhance adherence to medications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? results from a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(7), 1857.
Gomez, T., Anaya, Y. B., Shih, K. J., & Tarn, D. M. (2021). A qualitative study of primary care physicians’ experiences with telemedicine during COVID-19. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 34, S61-S70.
Guina, J., Dornfeld, B., & Pinals, D. A. (2022). A 20‐year follow‐up survey of police officers’ experience with Tarasoff warnings: How law enforcement reacts to clinicians’ duty to protect. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 40(4), 505-513.
Husabø, M., Mæhle, M., Råheim, M., & Qien, A. M. (2023). Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability–a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities.
Liddell, K., Skopek, J. M., Palmer, S., Martin, S., Anderson, J., & Sagar, A. (2020). Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(7), 421-426.
Miceli, B. (2020). Infanticide and the Symbolism of Evil in Joyce Carol Oates’s “Dear Husband”. ANGLICA-An International Journal of English Studies, 29(1), 75-85.
Peterman, N. R. (2019). The United States’ Relationship With the Insanity Defense Before and After United States v. Hinckley. PDXScholar.
Tay, A. K., Rees, S., Miah, M. A. A., Khan, S., Badrudduza, M., Morgan, K., Azim, D., Balasundaram, S. & Silove, D. (2019). Functional impairment as a proxy measure indicating high rates of trauma exposure, post-migration living difficulties, common mental disorders, and poor health amongst Rohingya refugees in Malaysia. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 213.
Theodos, K., & Sittig, S. (2021). Health information privacy laws in the digital age: HIPAA doesn’t apply. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 18.
Yaacoub, J. P. A., Noura, M., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., Yaacoub, E., Couturier, R., & Chehab, A. (2020). Securing Internet of Medical Things Systems: Limitations, issues and recommendations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105, 581-606.