Dahya, A. (2019). Reframing reproductive rights: Going beyond pro-choice vs. pro-life [Video]. YouTube. Web.
The TED talk by Amreen Dahya offers a potential illustration of the limitations of the pro-choice versus pro-life debate that lacks a critical perspective. In her illustration, this debate has not covered an extensive idea or offered a deep analysis of reproductive rights. Instead, she argues that reforms are critical as she criticizes how the discussion has given little attention to abortion in the public’s mainstream. She also uncovers a broader aspect under which reproductive rights have been undermined, including poor access to contraceptives, lack of affordable childcare, and undermining languages that have limited people from exploring their reproductive rights.
Dahya’s talk is helpful when seeking to broaden one’s understanding of reproductive rights beyond the binary pro-choice vs. pro-life debate. People lack the knowledge and comprehensive experience of abortion and reproductive rights. Therefore, Dahya uses personal stories and statistical data to make her argument.
While the video lacks empirical research, it offers a fresh perspective. Moreover, the video is highly engaging and practical for understanding the issues surrounding abortion and reproductive rights. Nevertheless, the source of the video can discourage others as YouTube is not a scholarly source. Adding and proving Dahya’s assertions with other reliable sources will be critical.
This is a perfect source to inform my research. It offers a viable approach to challenge individuals to develop a deep understanding of issues and concepts surrounding abortion. For instance, it helps the study to understand how issues like poor access to contraceptives or affordable childcare have been increasing cases of abortions. Through this lens, this source will be critical to informing the audience about the uncovered concepts and challenges they have not yet discovered.
Latt, S. M., Milner, A., & Kavanagh, A. (2019). Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: An ecological study in 162 countries. BMC Women’s Health,19(1). Web.
Illegal and unsafe abortion practices have been at the forefront of the causes of mortality. This study’s primary focus is investigating the relationship between abortion laws and maternal mortality rates across 162 countries. Throughout the study, the authors analyzed the various abortion laws across different countries, examining their level of restrictiveness and how they have impacted the mortality rate associated with abortion. The outcome was that countries that enforce restrictive laws on abortion expose their citizens to more mortality rates and unsafe reproductive healthcare practices. The authors’ primary argument is that restricting abortion forces people to seek hazardous solutions from various sources, some of which are not legally qualified or certified by medical procedures, causing a high mortality rate.
This source aims to offer an insightful view and a broad understanding of the relationship between restrictive abortion laws and mortality rates. This study’s strength lies in its comprehensive research, which focused on massive data across different nations. At the same time, the study uses scientifically approved approaches and offers informed decisions based on various reliable studies. It also provides a unique approach to the investigation, as it adopts a global perspective rather than focusing on a specific region, unlike other studies in the bibliography. Even though scholarly studies like this might present different challenges like biases in the analysis, the source is highly informative and credible in understanding the correlation between less restrictive abortion laws and lower maternal mortality rates.
This source is valuable for shaping my argument on the importance of access to safe and legal abortion services. The study focuses on expanding the understanding of reproductive and abortion rights to expand the notion that can help everyone understand the full scope of these issues. Also, this source offers enough evidence to help inform my study’s audience on the need to develop more liberal abortion laws. I can use it too emphasizes the best way to minimize the mortality rate associated with unlawful and dangerous abortion practices.
Medoff, M. (2016). Pro-choice versus pro-life: The relationship between State abortion policy and child well-being in the United States. Health Care for Women International, 37(2), 158–169. Web.
In this article, Medoff examines the two sides of the debate, Pro-choice versus pro-life, to identify the relationship between state-level abortion policy and child well-being in the U.S. To attain the study’s goal, Medoff implements a significant analysis and deep scrutiny of the Kids Count Data Center to understand the status of children’s well-being in the country while comparing the information with the state-level abortion policy. Consequently, the study found that highly restrictive abortion policies within a state are unsuitable for many children’s well-being outcomes. For instance, states with highly restrictive policies on human reproduction and abortion rights experience high infant mortality, child poverty, and child abuse.
This source’s primary goal is to investigate the relationship between abortion policies at the state level and children’s well-being in the United States. The study has done a significant and compelling job of bringing the connection between restrictive abortion laws and the well-being of children across different states. It also uses secondary sources and applies numerous perspectives of reliable studies and scholars to reach its decisions. However, the study’s provisions can be criticized for its limitations, especially on the generalizations that might impede its accuracy. Still, the study adheres to reliable and credible criteria in reaching its conclusions.
This source provides valuable information for understanding the potential impact of abortion policies on child well-being. It shapes my argument for less-restrictive abortion laws, which are needed to help people navigate the concept of abortion and reproductive rights. I can use it to provide evidence of how restrictive laws have impacted the well-being of many children. This study offers a well-informed assertion on the matter, emphasizing that offering highly restrictive abortion laws that limit people from accessing lawful abortion from experts leads to further damage as the child mortality rate rises in those regions and children’s well-being is minimized. It has not changed my perspective on the topic but offers more information and evidence to consider while shaping my opinions.
Redd, S. K., AbiSamra, R., Blake, S. C., Komro, K. A., Neal, R., Rice, W. S., & Hall, K. S. (2023). Medication abortion “reversal” Laws: How unsound science paved the way for dangerous abortion policy. American Journal of Public Health, 113(2), 202–212. Web.
This article discusses the scientific basis for so-called “medication abortion reversal” laws, which the author highly criticizes as unsound and lacks empirical research to support their assertions. The author has provided a full scope and understanding of this policy, showing that healthcare providers have long used it to inform patients about the possibility of reversing a medication abortion and coerced them to tell them where they got such procedures. While trying to understand the law and the science behind it, the study found that it has several flaws and is misused to sway the public into unsafe abortion practices, which cause severe health consequences.
The study’s primary goal is to criticize the scientific basis of “medication abortion reversal” laws in the U.S. Therefore, it offers a well-defined and supported critique of the medication abortion reversal laws. It provides a comprehensive understanding of these laws, providing evidence that supports the flaws of the abortion reversal laws. While criticizing these laws, the study utilizes numerous sources, including literature, to inform its decisions. At the same time, the article is published in a qualified scholarly journal, meaning its findings have been scientifically validated and can be relied upon.
The study offers an insightful view of the underlying forces and unsound policies combating human reproductive and abortion laws. It is essential to my research because it is a reliable way of uncovering the lies and unsupported ideas that limit the exploration of safe and sound abortion laws. It has shaped my understanding and let me understand the dangers of allowing ideology and irrational thoughts to trump scientific evidence when making laws and regulations related to reproductive rights. In my research, this source provides valuable evidence and insights that I can use to argue for evidence-based policy-making and critique laws and regulations based on unsound science.
Taneja, A., Nagaraja, S. B., Padubidri, J. R., Madadin, M., & Menezes, R. G. (2017). Abortion of fetus with Down’s Syndrome: India joins the worldwide controversy surrounding abortion laws. Science and Engineering Ethics. Web.
The article by Taneja et al. highlights the legal and ethical dilemma in India surrounding the abortion of fetuses with Down’s syndrome. In their analysis, the authors identify the various policies implemented to guide abortion in situations where the life of either the fetus or the mother is at risk. They found that the Indian Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 allows abortion in such cases.
Still, much is not understood when the issue is associated with a child’s genetic abnormality. Consequently, the study argues that more reforms are needed. Much emphasis must be placed on understanding every scope of human reproductive and abortion rights, including when a fetus presents a problem related to a genetic disorder.
Even though it focuses primarily on Indian and Indian laws regarding abortion, the study offers an understanding of the issues combating every nation. Even the U.S. government is not excepted to the ethical dilemmas experienced when a fetus has genetic disorders. Regarding its extensive research, the paper’s authors provide a comprehensive overview of the moral and legal debates surrounding the abortion of fetuses diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome. The article is also well-organized and proves its conclusion with references from empirical studies.
The issue of abortion can sometimes present an ethical dilemma. Nonetheless, the article has shaped my perspective into understanding that access to safe and legal abortions is essential for women’s reproductive rights and autonomy, especially if the case involves a fetus with a genetic disability. Moreover, its balanced perspective on the issue, considering the viewpoints of various stakeholders and providing a nuanced analysis of the tensions between reproductive rights and disability rights, makes it a reliable source to include in my study when supporting women’s rights in abortion rights. The study has not changed my perspective on the topic but has broadened my understanding of abortion and reproductive rights.
Wallace, D. (2019). Can you be a feminist and pro-life? I think you can [Video]. YouTube. Web.
This TEDx Talk video by Danielle Wallace provides a comprehensive understanding of women and the pro-life movement in the current environment, characterized by mixed reactions and perspectives between pro-life and pro-choice advocates. Throughout the video, Wallace narrates her life experiences as a woman with a pro-life mindset. Despite being raised in a pro-choice environment, she stands firm in her perspective. She believes that women can be pro-life and protect the life of the young ones while criticizing the unsound arguments surrounding abortion. In her conclusion, building understanding matters as it helps to overcome the irrational thoughts that can undermine pro-life activism.
It offers a unique perspective on the debate between pro-life and pro-choice advocates. However, Wallace provides a well-defined and insightful view of the relationship and how irrational thoughts and assumptions can be critical barriers to exploring abortion rights. Nevertheless, it is worth understanding that Wallace’s arguments are highly controversial and can challenge individuals’ mindsets regarding abortion. Moreover, it is a TEDx video, which has not gotten enough reviews and critiques from potential scholars.
This source is critical for the study, as it shapes my arguments to highlight women’s perspectives on the heated debates between pro-life and pro-choice. Therefore, the video provides a unique and thought-provoking perspective to the debate on abortion, challenging my assumption that feminism and pro-choice are inherently linked. I can implement it to add depth to my research topic by introducing a less commonly discussed perspective and engaging the study. It does not shift my view of the topic, but it drives my research to be more expansive and cover a broader perspective.