Introduction
Prejudice is entwined with various problems, such as social injustice, the role of religion in shaping social attitudes and beliefs, and the critical value of self-realization. The globe constantly evolves to interlock hope, inclusiveness, freedom, and democracy (Jackson, 2020). For instance, many people watched Barack Obama’s speech as the United States president because they shared the same ideologies. It is the message of hope that galvanized Obama’s political symbolism. People must feel safe to engage in every venture posed to them. Perception of equality and inequality establishes concepts within society. The formulation of social inequalities pervades society and maps the differential social class, socioeconomic, and ethnic categorization (Jackson, 2020). The research aims at analyzing the realism of ideological output from people based on their idealism of psychologically reacting to the new strain of virus.
It is fundamental to address the social instance of discrimination and prejudice. The social psychological perspectives may increase or reduce Prejudice between people emanating from different ideological or ethnic groups. In some situations, a community has a solid cohesive antipathy, resulting in a generation of conflicts. The social psychology of Prejudice dates back to the 1930s (Jackson, 2020). The historical narrative developed from components of Prejudice to a cross-strand approach. The intergroup relation begins with historical, social, and political contexts. The research methodology is based on historical contexts that are verified (Tileagă, 2019). The author is precise about the way people react to various circumstances. It also substantiates the desire for logical reasoning (Jackson, 2020). The social analogy of motivation is based on the underlying factors that put a situation at bay. For example, many people perished during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and those that saw the impact resorted to seeking cover. Evading the infection was the goal until the strand analogy started growing.
The realism of Prejudice during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The main desire that made people comply is how global media houses highlighted the rate of infections daily. Software engineers developed applications that could show real-time COVID-19 mortality rates in every continent. The mundane started as a conflict, and antipathy groups associated with grief created interdependent realism. One group was on the gaining side, while the other was bitter and hostile. Negative and positive stereotypes are balanced globally, making them intergroup relations (Jackson, 2020). The gaining group was people being funded because they assisted in managing the Pandemic. In contrast, the losing group was people dying or losing their families or relatives. However, Prejudice is not linked to people’s cost-benefit analysis or worldly interests. The government can influence the outcome of COVID-19 reactions but it depends on the approaches they use to address their citizens.
When the World Health Organization (WHO) announced a new strain of coronavirus, they made numerous countries take numerous measures. The measures included issuing a red alert for visitors from hot spots and encouraging social distancing. The conflicting message on a new strand made people take inappropriate steps that perplexed news outlets. The emergence of intergroup threats depended on the integrated threat theory of prejudice (Jackson, 2020). The financial danger was the fear of being poor or thriving in poverty, and there was a need to defy the guidelines posed to contain the spread of COVID-19. The realistic threat emanates from people who act in a manner that seeks to reflect the urge to be secure and healthy. These are the people who fear contracting the COVID-19 infection, and they follow all the guidelines (Tileagă, 2019). Symbolic threat refers to a cultural orientation that can make an individual safe or at risk of getting the virus. Some cultures advocate for quarantine, while others advocate for social teaming, and such actions can either increase or decrease the rate of infections.
Some people fail to follow strict guidelines because their character traits is dependent on the perception of the order. For instance, attitudes and social actions are dependent on behavior. The intergroup social contacts or occupations legitimize the target for Prejudice. People need to navigate in pre-categorized signs rather than providing a loop of unquestioned mechanisms (Jackson, 2020). Citizens have the free will to do what is right for them. However, governing them in a dire situation can be cumbersome because they will think the rules are tailored to limit their rights. Stereotyping is also a mental concern that subjects judgments based on erroneous consequences. The attributes of stereotyping categorize the results of everyone’s actions according to their multiracial orientations. Many globally assumed regular duties once they felt WHO was misguiding them during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Jackson, 2020). This is because they thought that it does not add value to their mental understanding. Nonetheless, a person’s emotion is dependent on their realism and way of decoding information.
Conclusion
Optimal distinctiveness is the solution to prejudices because it sustains subgroup entities. The ideal outcome in any circumstance is to belong to the subordinate identity. The assimilation of the COVID-19 scenario with the thoughts on consequences shows that people gravitate towards a distinctive group. Building cohesive communities will enhance the intriguing system whereby people assume the virus strands and resort to normal activities. The manifestation of prejudice depends on the degree of negative perception. Society is grouped according to paternalistic prejudice, and justification of every move or action depends on experimental evidence displayed by particular traits. Therefore, having strong indicative evidence is sufficient to scale people’s mindset baseline in connection to having the utmost ambient relational strategies.
References
Jackson, L. M. (2020). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action second edition. American Psychological Association. Web.
Tileagă, C. (2019). Communicating misogyny: An interdisciplinary research agenda for social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(7). Web.