Research Hypothesis
Analysis of historic activities in a case produces substantial evidence for persecution. Courts have depended on the evidence presented to indict based on material from crime scenes and pass sentences on cases. This has however been outwitted by the lawbreakers or destruction and loss of evidence which has led to improper persecution of trials.
Introduction
In the investigation of a criminal case, the crime reports can be taken on for scrutiny. These statements are derived from the scene or the area of alleged illegal activity. The perpetrator who is alleged to have committed the act is entitled to a fair trial. To grant this right, a comprehensive probe has to be carried out to determine the accusation based on evidence. The summary of the analyzed data from the investigation is presented in a court of law for legal action.
The court operates solely on evidence and the examiner has to prove the case beyond the reason of doubt. To scrutinize an illegal case, aspects of behavior structure are resolved before, at the period of, and beyond the unlawful act. These findings are merged with additional related facts and objective proof. This combination is used to contrast with the traits of familiar behavior styles and psychological defects to build up a sensible effective illustration of the wrongdoer. (Winerman, 2004)
The work of a prosecutor depends on the work done by the investigator. The nature of crime is that it is done in an undercover technique. This makes the unfolding of the illegal act with the offender challenging to the inspector. Investigators have adopted modern methods of unearthing evidence such as forensic and closed-circuit television recordings. (Meyer, 2000)
Research Objectives
The research seeks to find out which is the most appropriate method of exploring crime and the architects behind it. Investigators have used eye witness and their accounts in preparing cases for persecution. The lawbreakers have got smarter and developed ways of eluding the eye of the public by the use of stands such as disguises or masks. (Winerman, 2004)
The study will determine why cases of crime have had difficulties in the preparations. The wrongdoers have mastered their art of crime and they leave scenes with little evidence. This has resulted in crippling of law enforcement as justice is not normally served. Crime scenes have been destroyed or altered giving the investigators a difficult time. Some destructions could be intentional and some accidental. (Meyer, 2000)
The research paper scrutinizes if there are any advancements in crime probing technology. In order to prove cases as proposed, the prosecutor is required by law to convince the court using appropriate evidence. Law enforcers need to develop technologies that will aid them in getting these proofs. The equipment should be updated frequently as the criminals continue to improve on their activities which will escape undetected. (Winerman, 2004)
Literature Review
Law enforcers have had difficulties in their investigations of criminal cases. Officers have adopted the use of human behavior in trying to determine the cause of the crime committed. In these latter days, reporting crime is found to be law implementation and also partly behavior identify. It is a relatively contemporary method of solving crime and mostly is seen in motion pictures. The Federal Bureau of Investigation uses the terms “criminal investigative analysis” to describe the examination of a criminal.
This method assists the officers in the inspection of proof, casualty, and onlookers’ accounts. The expressions can be mentally inconsistent such as character mannerism, psychic and deed trends. Residential areas and other social attributes can also be used. These factors are used by the officer in determining the approach he/she will use in the grilling of the victim. (Winerman, 2004)
In line with the use of examination of the suspect, there is a forensic application on the facts presented in the case. Broad scrutiny of the case files with an effort to settle on a possible solution to the quest. This is a method of inspection greatly focused on appraisal, offense account rebuilding, felony study, and practical learning of the crime.
Outlining solely cannot spot the precisely supposed victim; it actually gives a sketch of the possible victim setting. (Meyer, 2000) The analysis is used to narrow down to the possible location of the supposed victim’s position. To investigate a criminal activity requires lots of resources which makes focusing on leads advantageous. Investigators have had success stories after following such leads as observed in the case of a bomber in New York who eluded police traps. The officers consulted a psychologist who analyzed the data which led to the arrest of the suspect after follow through. (Winerman, 2007)
Research Methodology
The study uses secondary data from recordings of past criminal cases and files from the criminal investigation department. Articles published on criminology are also utilized in the examination. The data is retrieved from online sources and compared to develop a comprehensive paper on trial appraisal.
Research Findings
When undertaking a felony area examination, there are six basic steps that ought to be followed. (Winerman, 2004) It begins with the contributory data and evidence. This will consist of whatever substance originating from the crime area that could be of use. The profiler only collects the primary data and does not invite proposals about other probable perpetrators at this stage. This allows for a determined focus on the case using the available information to expand later into the inquiry. Bombarding the investigator with secondary data at this stage can endanger the profile formulation.
The process of making a judgment based on the available evidence follows after the collection. The primary data is set into consequential queries and guides together with a number of elements. The plan of investigation is then formed and carried out in pursuit of the likely victim. (Winerman, 2004)The queries are designed to probe those who will be asked so as to lead the investigator closer to the victim. Caution should be taken to shun questions that will divert the officer from the intended path. This will give the deductions a direction to follow through. (Meyer, 2000)
The stage setting of the crime should be ascertained based on the analysis in the first two steps. The profiler tries to rebuild the operations of the perpetrator and his subject. The officer asks him/herself the probabilities based on the evidence at hand. Was the crime intentional or an act of omission?
These could be some of the queries that the facts should give the course. After the scene has been restaged, the perpetrator has to be projected. A reproduction image to the executor is formed by the profiler as a starting point. This will be inclining towards his demographic traits. It is a very tedious stage of the profiler’s quest of finding the criminal as it is usually difficult to narrow down on a personality owing to the available proof. (Turvey, 2009) The profiler should revisit the findings at the second stage for comparison and relate them to the proposal.
Modern technologies are available for use in readjusting the profile. (Rittman, 2006) After the probable images are formed, they are handed to the investigator in a description form. It is upon the investigator to try and match the description in the possible areas near the crime scene. Alteration of the sketch can be done if new evidence is realized and a response procedure is begun from the second step to modify it. Fixation on an idea of the suspect can lead to wrong arrests that jeopardize the intention of solving the crime.
Seizing the felon is the objective of the whole process. A professional follow-through on the process will corner the suspect to own up for the atrocities. If the steps are diligently carried out, most suspects feel helpless and give information even of past crimes. The apprehending of the suspect should appear at the end of the investigation as people have a right to freedom until proven guilty. (Turvey, 2009)
Conclusion
Solving offenses and criminal activities have been a tedious task for law enforcers. The forensic analysis approach to solving crime has helped unearth many felons. Serial killers, rapists, and other criminals who repeat their activities create havoc in society. All in all, criminal activities render a society unworthy of itself and its neighbors. The steps outlined above can be used in the profiling and later prosecution of criminals. The Federal Agencies have used the procedure to identify and interrogate suspects with much success.
The use of profiling in policing criminal activities has helped end numerous high-level crimes. The use of human psychology to trace the steps of a criminal has been well researched by law enforcement organizations. The Federal Bureau of Investigations has instituted research to facilitate investigators with modern methods of profiling.
List of Reference
Meyer, C.B. (2000). Introduction to Criminal Profiling: The purpose of a behavioral profile. Web.
Rittman, M. (2006). Data Profiling and Automated Cleansing Using Oracle Warehouse Builder 10g Release 2. Data profiling and Correcting within Oracle Warehouse Builder. Web.
Turvey, B. (2009). Criminal Profiling. The FBI’s Crime Scene Analysis. Web.
Winerman, L. (2004).Criminal profiling: the reality behind the myth. Web.