Procter & Gamble: The Case Study Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview of the key issues of Procter & Gamble presented in the business case. The issues that will be discussed include cannibalization, customer lifetime value, market share, product development, and customer segmentation. The company owns a number of well-performing brands, such as Tide, Cheer, and Gain, which all grew in sales by 12% (Davenport et al., 2013). As a result, the company’s share in the North American laundry detergent market increased from an already extremely impressive 50% (Davenport et al., 2013). Procter & Gamble has a broad selection of products in the following segments: “Beauty, Grooming, Health Care, Fabric Care and Home Care, and Baby Care and Family Care” (Davenport et al., 2013). This range allows the company to engage with an extensive customer demographic.

To obtain a competitive advantage and increase or sustain growth, the company is always researching and experimenting with innovative products. Its new eco-friendly compacted detergent is an excellent example of that. When Procter & Gamble was launching the new line, there were concerns that customers would not trust the small form factor’s efficiency and switch to another brand that sold traditional laundry powder (Davenport et al., 2013). This presented a substantial risk to the company’s customer lifetime value, as people were not likely to reconsider their choice after moving to a different label. Tests showed that buyers recognized the concentrated detergent’s positive environmental impact and higher convenience and preferred it over other offerings. However, to launch the new product globally, Procter & Gamble had to cut production of their other detergents in all factories in North America (Davenport et al., 2013). Cannibalizing the old plants to start manufacturing new products caused a prolonged shutdown and meant that the company could no longer supply non-compacted detergents. Even after the successful test, this irreversible transition carried substantial risks.

Reference

Davenport, T. H., Jansiti, M., & Serels, A. (2013). Managing Analytics at Procter & Gamble.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 7). Procter & Gamble: The Case Study. https://ivypanda.com/essays/procter-amp-gamble-the-case-study/

Work Cited

"Procter & Gamble: The Case Study." IvyPanda, 7 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/procter-amp-gamble-the-case-study/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Procter & Gamble: The Case Study'. 7 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Procter & Gamble: The Case Study." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/procter-amp-gamble-the-case-study/.

1. IvyPanda. "Procter & Gamble: The Case Study." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/procter-amp-gamble-the-case-study/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Procter & Gamble: The Case Study." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/procter-amp-gamble-the-case-study/.

Powered by CiteTotal, best essay citation maker
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1