Introduction
Building relationships between individual subjects in different communities or groups is often accompanied by the practice of establishing management mechanisms. Regarding the public sphere as a whole, administration, as a phenomenon designed to build an algorithm for control and reporting and regulate the nature of relevant services’ operations, makes it possible to realize similar goals. To avoid mistakes and differences of opinion, the application of adequate theoretical and practical methods is an essential attribute of successful work. As a result, successful public administration can be characterized as a set of theoretical and practical tools designed to maintain order and effective control.
The Need for Administration
The relevance of administration in the public sphere is due to a number of reasons. Firstly, coordinating any interventions involving cash and other forms of assets requires a competent approach to avoid planning errors. According to Grimmelikhuijsen et al. (2017), it is critical to consider traditional administrative principles from different perspectives, including behavioral nuances, largely due to the expanded range of duties imposed on public managers. Secondly, the ability to coordinate the work of different authorities and establish a coherent operational algorithm in which each party engaged effectively copes with the tasks assigned is a valuable administrative perspective. Therefore, the importance of competent management is determined by the multilateral nature of relationships in the public environment.
The need for administration is also due to the importance of managerial work to build valid decision-making strategies. For instance, as Ho (2018) notes, most governments face constant public pressure and hardship due to financial issues. Establishing control cycles, such as fiscal and reporting conventions to comply, allows administrators to maintain order and control cash flows both within specific sectors and beyond. By using adequate monitoring mechanisms, responsible persons maintain the stability of all systems, whether inside or outside organizational units. Theoretical and practical factors, in this case, play an essential role as justified incentives and drivers, allowing those in power to rely on specific management frameworks. Thus, administration contributes to maintaining order and ensuring adequate control over various aspects, including such important ones as financial activities.
Theoretical and Practical Implications
The reason why the theoretical and practical nuances of public administration should be taken into account is the possibility of establishing flexible coordination norms. For instance, Andrews et al. (2017) consider the features of building the administrative apparatus in Turkey. The researchers analyze the transition to advanced and innovative policy-making at the end of the 20th century in the country (Andrews et al., 2017). According to them, such a shift was largely due to the use of a strategic approach based on combining theoretical and practical nuances (Andrews et al., 2017). In other words, by creating a robust conceptual framework, administrators can build sustainable and efficient practical patterns to follow. As a result, for public administration, different types of data are useful.
Conclusion
Public administration is a field that involves a wide range of theoretical frameworks and practical steps designed to establish order and ensure control over various aspects. The significance of administration is due to the critical tasks that the responsible executors cope with, namely asset monitoring, reporting, and other duties. The combination of practical and theoretical aspects makes it possible to form strategically competent projects to optimize control and improve the administrative functioning of governing boards.
References
Andrews, R., Beynon, M. J., & Genc, E. (2017). Strategy implementation style and public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 4.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.
Ho, A. T. K. (2018). From performance budgeting to performance budget management: Theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 748-758.