R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The case of R v Dudley and Stephens is a unique form of crime, which revealed the major underlying fact that one cannot defend himself or herself against a murder charge due to necessity. It is important that the case was an abhorrent one, which involved cannibalism and the murder of a crew member. The crew comprised Richard Parker, Edmund Brooks, Edwin Stephens, and Tom Dudley, the captain. A gale resulted in a yacht being hit with a powerful wave, which led to the abandonment of the ship with the use of a lifeboat.

The loss of the yacht took place on July 5, 1884, and until July 7 of the same year, men survived by sharing turnips. On July 9, the crew was able to spot a turtle and capture it for consumption. It should be noted that the lack of water was the most challenging part of the survival, and although the animal provided some amount of meat and bones, its liquids were contaminated with seawater. The thirst became an ever-increasing problem for the crew, leading them to take desperate measures of drinking their urine on July 13. After three days, two crew members, Stephens and Parker, became sick due to drinking the seawater. After several days passed for their thirst and hunger to intensify, between July 16 and 17, discussions about cannibalism began. The conversation gradually turned into a heated debate and arguments by July 21, and after three days, Parker fell into a coma. The captain proposed to feed on Parker in order for them to survive and objected to Stephens having a family to take care of, but his arguments were not convincing.

Around July 25, 1884, the captain and Stephens decided to kill Parker to cannibalize him. The key reasoning was that natural death would render the victim’s blood undrinkable, and thirst was the most important incentive and problem. Although Tom Dudley claims that Brooks did not protest against the two, the latter claims that he was not involved in the decision-making. After saying the prayer, the captain used a penknife to stab the jugular view of the victim while Stephens was holding his legs in case of resistance. It was reported that Parker stated, “what me?” with confusion before dying from the attack. Subsequently, the remaining crew feasted upon Parker’s corpse and consumed his blood to satisfy their thirst. It was reported that both Brooks and the captain ate the most parts of the victim’s body, whereas Stephens only consumed the least.

The crew spotted a sail on July 29, which rescued them on a bark called Montezuma. The three men were brought to Falmouth on September 6. The crew reported the loss of the ship in accordance with the Merchant Shipping Acts. There was a sense of belief among Stephens and Dudley that their act of cannibalism would not result in persecution due to the custom of the sea. However, the two crew members were charged with murder, but they were able to convince the jury that it was an absolutely necessary action for them to survive, which did not result in any verdict. The case was transferred to the High Court, where Lord Coleridge decided that Stephens and Dudley were guilty. The death sentence was prescribed for the offenders, but the public outcry turned it to six months of imprisonment. The reasoning for the murder charge is that necessity does not justify murder in any situation.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, March 17). R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary. https://ivypanda.com/essays/r-v-dudley-and-stephens-case-summary/

Work Cited

"R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary." IvyPanda, 17 Mar. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/r-v-dudley-and-stephens-case-summary/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary'. 17 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary." March 17, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/r-v-dudley-and-stephens-case-summary/.

1. IvyPanda. "R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary." March 17, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/r-v-dudley-and-stephens-case-summary/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "R v. Dudley and Stephens: Case Summary." March 17, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/r-v-dudley-and-stephens-case-summary/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1