Introduction
We all live in a consumer society. It means that there are many products that are introduced to satisfy diverse individuals needs and provide them with all goods they might want. One could think that there are no problems with products at the moment. However, the situation is not ideal. The fact is that the focus on quantity has a pernicious impact on the quality of the products that could be found in stores nowadays. Very often we use substitutes for some real products to assure that all people will be able to get them. It goes without saying that natural products are more useful; however, another problem appears. They still might be dangerous to people because they contain some elements that are excluded from these products substitutes. The same goes for raw milk.
Analysis
The problem is especially topical for North Carolina. The fact is that that it is one of 38 states that do not allow stores to sell raw milk. There are several reasons for this decision. First of all, it might contain pathogens or viruses that have a great pernicious impact on a person and result in the appearance of different diseases (“Raw Milk Misconceptions and the Danger of Raw Milk Consumption”). Additionally, when speaking about raw milk, very often its producers might have serious violations in procedures and sanitarian norms that could not but impact the quality of the final product. Moreover, people might also be allergic to some elements that could be found in it.
At the same time, raw milks positive impact on a persons health could hardly be overestimated (Nelson). Scientists have already admitted the fact that the usage of raw milk could improve lactose tolerance and help people who were not able to consume this very product (Weston A. Pierce Foundation 3). Moreover, it could also be used to treat asthma. Researchers state the fact that among patients using raw milk higher recovery rates were noted (Patterson). For this reason, people should also be provided with an opportunity to buy this very product.
Besides, the main thing which prevents the government from accepting this idea is the lack of firmness in the quality of the product suggested by local unlicensed manufacturers. This governmental regulation is introduced to protect citizens from the outbreaks of different diseases. For this reason, the given limit exists. However, there is a simple and efficient solution to the problem. Local producers should be engaged in collaboration with the government and become a licensed manufacturer of raw milk. It will also mean that the practice of the constant monitoring of the quality will be introduced and only in case an entrepreneur passes through this very procedure, his/her products will be given the needed permission.
Manufacturers should realize the fact that it is a profitable business and cooperation with the government is crucial for the positive final result. It will guarantee that their products are licensed and allowed to local markets. At the same time, statistics show a constantly increasing demand for raw milk (Ames). Consideration of the given tendency will help to acquire additional incomes and contribute to the further evolution of the local agricultural sector.
Conclusion
Altogether, the given proposal could be an ideal solution to the given problem as it takes into account the most important points peculiar to this very question and suggests a compromise that will result in the appearance of raw milk in local stores.
Works Cited
Ames, Marissa. “Raw Milk Benefits vs. the Law.” Countryside Daily. Web.
Nelson, Suzanne. “Drink It Raw.” Indy. Web.
“Raw Milk Misconceptions and the Danger of Raw Milk Consumption.” FDA. Web.
Patterson, Sara. “Got raw milk?” CreativeSoaFing, 2014. Web.
Weston A. Pierce Foundation. Rebuttal to the FDA Article. “Raw Milk Misconceptions and the Danger of Raw Milk Consumption.” Realmilk, 2012. Web.